Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HIT-INFO ЕЛЕНА АЧКАСОВА

Channel

HIT-INFO ЕЛЕНА АЧКАСОВА

@hitinfo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,083subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001409594219
TypeChannel
Username@hitinfo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hitinfo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,03814,11514,076.57 August 2026 — 14,074 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,074 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,044 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,038 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,051 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,046 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,061 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,062 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,057 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,068 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,080 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,078 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,070 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,067 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,068 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,084 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,080 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,088 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,101 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,113 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,103 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,114 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,109 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,115 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,104 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,083 subscribers14,0837 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,026–14,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:5914,083-21
16 Sept 2026, 19:4014,104-11
14 Sept 2026, 20:3614,115+6
13 Sept 2026, 05:5914,109-5
11 Sept 2026, 08:1914,114+11
8 Sept 2026, 11:0114,103-10
5 Sept 2026, 04:4214,113+12
3 Sept 2026, 10:1314,101+13
2 Sept 2026, 06:3414,088+8
1 Sept 2026, 07:2714,080-4
31 Aug 2026, 08:1314,084+16
30 Aug 2026, 09:4714,068+15
29 Aug 2026, 09:4614,053-14
28 Aug 2026, 08:3814,067-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:2414,070-8
25 Aug 2026, 07:2314,078-7
24 Aug 2026, 04:2314,085+5
22 Aug 2026, 13:3214,080+12
21 Aug 2026, 01:1814,068+11
20 Aug 2026, 03:2514,057first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 14,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held44 (24 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total28,148
Reactions total1,281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 40m
Average length
25m 15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,511 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,01854.8%
🔥1,73631.5%
👍2574.66%
😁1452.63%
🥰1212.20%
🙏1071.94%
💯550.998%
🤩420.762%
👏300.544%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:08 UTC908 views113 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Чтобы что-то продолжалось, нужно обнаружить не только то, что есть сейчас, но и то, что было до этого. ➡️А где сейчас находится то, что было до этого? Может тоже в этом?

55🔥35😁14👍7🤩1🙏1

1 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,520 views154 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🩷Обрати внимание на сам вопрос: «Как смотреть в момент, чтобы сдвинуться от борьбы с тем, что есть?» Что значит сдвиг? Страшная картинка может оставаться страшной. Усталость усталостью. Бунт бунтом. Может не становиться легче. Может не происходить никакого перещелка. И даже мысль: «Я больше не могу так» может появляться. Вопрос не в том, как убрать ее или перестать бороться. Когда появляется: «я борюсь с тем, ч

86🔥47🙏12👍6🥰2💯1

1 Sept 2026, 04:35 UTC≈1,650 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔥🔥🔥Все самое интересное месяца в одном месте! ❤️Дайджест насыщенного яркого августа уже на сайте ➡️Смотрите ЗДЕСЬ

24🙏5🤩2

31 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,860 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Что делать с тем, что уже произошло? Иногда событие занимает несколько секунд. А вопросов после него десятки. Что я сделал не так? Почему это произошло? Можно ли было иначе? Что теперь с этим делать? Но событие уже произошло. 🔥Что тогда прямо сейчас не дает покоя? Эфир открытый, ссылка здесь перед стартом 🔥Смотрите запись https://t.me/hitinfo/6030 предыдущего эфира, пишите узнавания в комментариях и участвуйте

74🔥45👏5🥰2

28 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,840 views184 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❤️Что именно повторяется? «Опять тревога». «Опять та же реакция». «Это уже привычка». «У меня всегда так». Чтобы что-то повторялось, должно быть как минимум два: то, что было, и то, что происходит снова. Но прямо сейчас обнаруживается только одно. А то, что «было»? Где «было» кроме мысли истории сейчас «это было» ➡️Но что именно повторилось, если второго никогда нет одновременно с первым?

🔥8068🥰14👍13😁8👏1

27 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈3,100 views142 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❤️ «Уже» ничего не отменяет. Оно ставит под вопрос не действие, а того, кто будто находится вне происходящего и должен обеспечить продолжение 🔥уже происходящего.

78🔥53💯10🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,950 views104 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❤️Да, различия очевидны: разные характеры, интересы, способности, способы проявления. Но вот что именно делает их «проявлением сознания», «программой эго» или «уникальной энергией»? Все это уже объяснения того, почему форма именно такая. А до объяснения — просто именно так. И, возможно, не нужно знать, почему оно такое, чтобы быть именно таким.

58🔥46

25 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈3,220 views114 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Фрагмент события «Архитектура восприятия» Почему так верится в то, что «это моя жизнь»? Все записи сессий доступны ЗДЕСЬ 👆 #указатели@hitinfo

55🔥43👍10👏5🥰1

24 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,340 views107 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Иногда контроль становится настолько тонким, что уже совсем не выглядит контролем. «Я не управляю ребенком. Я просто создаю для него правильные условия». «Я не управляю командой. Я просто задаю направление». «Я не влияю на человека. Я просто помогаю ему». Но вот интересный вопрос: ➡️ А что подтверждает, что именно это стало причиной того, что произошло дальше? Именно здесь управляющий может обнаружиться в совер

60🔥33👍12😁2

24 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈2,910 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Подробности о ретрите ЗДЕСЬ Есть особая ценность в формате, где встреча не заканчивается вместе с сессией. Три дня вместе. Дорога, прогулки, разговоры, тишина, катер, кофе у воды, случайная фраза, взгляд, остановка. И невозможно заранее знать, что именно вдруг станет указателем. Здесь ничто не откладывается до следующей встречи. То, что возникает, встречается прямо там, где возникло: посреди обычного шага, слова

50🔥31👍13👏3

21 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,850 views109 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Этим летом вышло еще одно интервью, о котором говорилось на эфирах, но еще не делились здесь: ➡️ https://youtu.be/3aP0pYvy0Pg?si=FFcHDGhp5aSSFazl Смотрите, пишите комментарии в YouTube под видео - что узнается ❤️ #интервью@hitinfo

🔥5048🤩7🥰4

19 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈4,200 views244 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Сначала: «Мне нужно сделать». Потом: «Не нужно ничего делать» 🙂И «ничего не делать» становится тем, что теперь нужно сделать.

😁9569🔥49💯25🥰4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @hitinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hitinfo edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lee — Вибрации
@lee_vibrations · 29,770
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Марина Тушевская. Канал
@tushevskaia · 23,197
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Обретение силы любви
@obreteniesilylubvi · 33,317
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIT-INFO ЕЛЕНА АЧКАСОВА” (@hitinfo), 14,083 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hitinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.