8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,730–25,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 08:08
25,737
-8
12 Aug 2026, 22:27
25,745
+1
11 Aug 2026, 22:31
25,744
-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:17
25,748
-8
10 Aug 2026, 02:11
25,756
-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:14
25,763
-4
8 Aug 2026, 00:43
25,767
-17
7 Aug 2026, 06:48
25,784
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
750
Videos
358
Links
110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,990 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,074
67.6%
👍
1,095
12.2%
🔥
789
8.78%
🙏
398
4.43%
❤🔥
194
2.16%
🥰
97
1.08%
💯
94
1.05%
👏
76
0.845%
🏆
25
0.278%
🕊
23
0.256%
😍
23
0.256%
👌
16
0.178%
💋
15
0.167%
😎
14
0.156%
🤩
10
0.111%
🎉
9
0.1%
😘
9
0.1%
🤗
7
0.078%
🤔
5
0.056%
🫡
5
0.056%
5 further kinds
12
0.133%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,990reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 18 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prostovtak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2025 to 18 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️
Дорогие друзья, с любовью и благодарностью сообщаем, что канал «ДОМ» завершает свою работу и больше не будет функционировать.
Многие из вас делились, что сложно удерживать внимание на главном, когда чатов и каналов становится слишком много. Мы вас очень понимаем и поэтому приняли решение объединить всё ценное в одном месте.
Теперь весь контент — рубрики, статьи, практики — будет публиковаться на основно…
Никто за вас это не сделает! 🥹
Не посмотрит эфир, не запишет новые техники, не узнает новостей и не получит ответы на свои главные запросы.
Первый прямой эфир этого лета с Еленой уже сегодня, в 18:00 по Мск ❤️
Ждем вас, дорогие, по ссылке:
🔵YOU TUBE
🔵RUTUBE
Почему мы так устаём?
Потому что решаем слишком много задач за других людей.
Мы начинаем жить чужими «надо», «обязан» и «должен», забывая про себя.
Остановитесь на секунду и напишите на листке: «Я много решаю задач за других людей».
🔵Вот оно — ваше напряжение.
↪️Когда вы постоянно включаетесь в чужие проблемы, вы теряете себя. Напрягаетесь. А теперь задайте себе простой вопрос: «А я чего хочу?»
↪️Настоящая своб…
Карта дня!
Друзья! Ваше осознание на сегодня ❤️
Помните, дорогие, что для каждого осознание будет свое.
Делитесь своими ассоциациями с нами. Какая ситуация проигралась у вас? Как вы расшифровали данную карту под себя?🃏
Внимание!
Просьба обратить внимание, что на наших основных каналах школы👇
🔵 https://t.me/perexodvtak
🔵 https://t.me/prostovtak
Изменились аватарки.
Данные канала по-прежнему принадлежат @perexodvtak и мне, её автору Елене Реуновой ❤️
Я есть спокойствие.
Мы живем в мире, где всегда кто-то спешит, требует, звонит, пишет капслоком: «Срочно делаем!»
↪️И в такие моменты мы начинаем теряться, метаться, переживать.
🔵Но можно выбрать и другое. Скажите себе: «Спокойствие. Только спокойствие».
Это не просто слова. Это — целая техника. Когда вы произносите их, включается некий внутренний порядок👇🏽
Ум замедляется. Мысли становятся яснее. Дыхание станови…
Вопрос от подписчицы:
❓ «Как принять наилучшее решение для меня? Как понять, что вот это - оно?»
Ответ от Елены Реуновой на этот вопрос вы можете прослушать ниже👇🏽
Частенько, за чашкой чая, мы делимся друг с другом различными забавными историями, моментами, анекдотами.
В анекдотах зачастую скрыт тайный смысл.
⠀
Делимся сегодня с вами одним из любимых анекдотов Елены Реуновой!
⠀
🔵«Женщина лежит в постели с любовником. Вдруг раздается звонок в дверь. Она понимает, что пришел муж и в порыве отчаяния восклицает: «Господи, сделай так, чтобы он ничего не заметил!»
⠀
Разверзаются неб…
✨Мини - курс «Мудрость за 1 минуту в день»
#мини_курс_так
❤395👍127🔥64❤🔥30🥰22👏6💋6😍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @prostovtak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 535,216 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ада Кондэ - личный канал - Ada Conde @Adaconde1 · 126,047 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Тимофей Кармацкий @karmatsky_timofey · 186,889 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Переход в ТАК. ДОМ” (@prostovtak), 25,737 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostovtak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
