Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Макс Трейси

Channel

Макс Трейси

@maxtreysi

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

43,218subscribers

+83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001912641925
TypeChannel
Username@maxtreysi
DescriptionКанал о том, как выжить в эпоху AI. Закрытый AI клуб: t.me/maxtreysi/872 Магазин подписок: @treysi_market_bot Связаться: @max_treysi IG: www.instagram.com/maxtreysi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maxtreysi

Growth

43,13543,65443,394.57 August 2026 — 43,135 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,286 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,456 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,593 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,577 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,654 subscribers15 August 2026 — 43,590 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,587 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,529 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,243 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,184 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,218 subscribers43,2187 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,057–43,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:1943,218+34
21 Aug 2026, 00:2543,184-59
20 Aug 2026, 01:2343,243-216
19 Aug 2026, 04:4843,459-70
18 Aug 2026, 01:5143,529-58
16 Aug 2026, 22:1443,587-3
15 Aug 2026, 16:4443,590-64
14 Aug 2026, 04:4843,654+77
12 Aug 2026, 20:5343,577-16
11 Aug 2026, 20:4243,593+57
10 Aug 2026, 21:4543,536+80
9 Aug 2026, 21:1243,456+170
8 Aug 2026, 22:2143,286+130
8 Aug 2026, 00:5443,156+21
7 Aug 2026, 22:0343,135first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 43,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,990
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.891%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held24 (16 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total135,750
Reactions total1,209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
391
Videos
38
Links
121

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
3m 25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,703 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
64237.7%
🔥52330.7%
👍33619.7%
custom 53686352723323521731639.57%
🐳271.59%
🤯120.705%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,703reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 24 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maxtreysi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,090 views37 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Записал небольшое видео... Обзор AI Room Club за 3 минуты Присоединиться к нам

15🔥12custom 53686352723323521738🐳1👍1

19 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈6,200 views66 reactions3 Starsread 22 August 2026

Упомянул(а) Вас в канале⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Хочу обратиться к тебе дорогой читатель, друг, подписчик)) Удели пару минут. Ты наверняка когда читаешь этот канал и речь заходит о моем закрытом клубе думаешь, что его основная цель это продавать курсы, да?)🤷‍♂️ Но поверь, это последнее, на чем мы хотим делать там акцент)) Я вообще не хочу, чтобы его воспринимали, как какую-то онлайн школу, марафон и прочие инфо-

33🔥18custom 536863527233235217313🤯2

19 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈6,040 views34 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

Набросились на меня в комментариях выше ахах)) НО, я ведь не говорил о том, что мы должны конкурировать с ИИ :) Это очевидно невозможно 😨 Всё совсем наоборот. Дораскрываю мысль. 1.5х ставьте

🔥17👍76custom 53686352723323521734

18 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈5,820 views90 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026

Заметил вообще кто-то, как всё ускорилось в мире? Прям заметно. Главная причина, кншн, очевидна) Сейчас в принципе делать что-то медленно заведомо проигрышная стратегия. Иначе тебя любой дубень с клодом обойдет. Знания всё. Навыки уже почти тоже всё. Что остается? Скорость, решительность, смекалка)) Недавно фразу такую услышал, что «сегодня, чтобы стоять на месте – нужно бежать, а чтобы расти – нужно бежать ОЧЕНЬ

46👍18🔥18custom 53686352723323521737🐳1

17 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈6,060 views61 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

ОТЧЕЕЕЕЕТ (как обещал выше) Рассказываю быстро, что произошло за последние 2 месяца в AI Room Club? 🤝 Хотел бы просто написать «дофига всего», но ладно уж... Во первых, стабильно держим планку! Внутри клуба 1000+ участников🚪 Тыща людей, кто видит в ИИ возможности и уже делают что-то. Создают агентов, вайбкодят проекты, автоматизируют рутину. Мне нравится. Многим из вас наверняка было лень заходить в отзывы, но вы

🔥2922👍8🐳1custom 53686352723323521731

15 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈6,360 views59 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Классный подкастик, на вечерок советую https://youtu.be/1aGpJQ8BMLI?si=ekPCp9tv0eh9s-qx Биткоин. ИИ. Роботы. Нам надо быть в этих рядах!!!🐒

29🔥17👍9🐳2custom 53686352723323521732

14 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈6,450 views68 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

Джарвис в умных очках?! Прикупил себе на днях Meta RayBan (Gen 2) и прям кайфанул от того, куда они сейчас двигаются. Если отбросить дефолтные функции вроде «съемки видео» и «наушников», то сегодня они активно развивают внутри свой Meta AI. С помощью него + очков ты по сути можешь прям СУПЕР нативно взаимодействовать с ИИ. Что-то спросить, загуглить, отправить, записать, проанализировать объект, который ты видишь

38🔥22🤯8

12 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈7,860 views125 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Пора бы уже принять это, не?) Удивляет, как многие до сих пор сопротивляются тому, что началась эпоха AI и как прежде уже не будет 😌 И ты либо принимаешь это и учишься действовать по новому, либо остаешься за бортом нашей новой реальности. Заметьте, всегда когда в нашем мире появились новые технологии, которые меняют привычное, были скептики, выступающие против. И что это им давало? Ничего. Только время и возможно

custom 53686352723323521735939🔥22👍5

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈11,300 views107 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Как я собрал Джарвиса, который слышит, видит и говорит 🤯 Джарвис — это ИИ-ассистент, который живёт у меня на ноуте и в телефоне одновременно. Чтобы дать ему задачу можно сказать «Хей Джарвис» в комнате, позвонить с телефона или написать в Telegram — и это один и тот же ассистент с единой памятью. Нормально так хайпанула эта тема за последние дни 😅 Много сообщений в личке о том, как сделать такое же. Что ж... будем

🔥4537👍19custom 53686352723323521736

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈8,930 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥5

29 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈10,700 views180 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026

СДЕЛАТЬ ПОТОМ ОБЗОР КАК СДЕЛАЛ?!😈

👍117🔥4221

29 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈11,100 views128 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8618🐳15👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @maxtreysi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@maxtreysi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Макс Трейси” (@maxtreysi), 43,218 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxtreysi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.