Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мари и Сандра Булочка

Channel

Мари и Сандра Булочка

@meandsandrabulo4ka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,245subscribers

-460 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577564559
TypeChannel
Username@meandsandrabulo4ka
DescriptionМария Чехова | стилист, инфлюенсер Мой личный взгляд на моду, реальные образы, стилизации и честные рекомендации Реклама: @marichekhova_PR Разбор гардероба: @marichekhova Мах: https://max.ru/meandsandrabulo4ka А+ Перечень РКН: https://clck.ru/3GJZoe
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/meandsandrabulo4ka

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,06017,82217,44117,2457 August 20266 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 91 days, net -460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,946–17,936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 12:0417,245-11
5 Nov 2026, 08:5817,256-10
4 Nov 2026, 10:0017,266-4
3 Nov 2026, 13:0017,270+3
2 Nov 2026, 15:3417,267-29
1 Nov 2026, 12:4717,296-16
31 Oct 2026, 13:4117,312-8
30 Oct 2026, 15:5417,320-27
29 Oct 2026, 16:3917,347-23
28 Oct 2026, 13:0917,370-21
27 Oct 2026, 14:1617,391-25
26 Oct 2026, 17:3117,416-27
25 Oct 2026, 17:4417,443-29
24 Oct 2026, 19:0817,472-44
23 Oct 2026, 17:2017,516-101
22 Oct 2026, 19:2117,617-145
21 Oct 2026, 15:0517,762-60
20 Oct 2026, 10:3617,822+274
19 Oct 2026, 13:3117,548+140
18 Oct 2026, 10:4617,408first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.93%
avg views ÷ 17,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held85 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total14,336
Reactions total473
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,480
Videos
≈484
Links
≈1,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 48s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,542 reactions across 85 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,90653.8%
🔥75421.3%
😍3349.43%
👍3168.92%
💯712.00%
😁561.58%
🥰421.19%
🎉300.847%
custom 5251306133129284661250.706%
🤝80.226%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,542 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.35%
2 of 85 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,300
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,170
over 83 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeHfYH1118 August 202618 August 2026
2SDnjeLMRnA117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:16 UTC961 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Жаль, что в РФ нельзя купить все мировые бренды, но, к счастью, у нас есть Dropp Market, где начались DROPP DAYS — целый месяц скидок до 80%. Отличный повод присмотреть вещи, которые пригодятся уже сейчас: тёплую верхнюю одежду, сапоги, сумку и уютные шарфы и шапки В моей подборке — актуальные модели и микс ценовых категорий. Люблю сочетать премиум с более доступными марками: интересный образ складывается из вещей с…

🔥20❤13👍5

5 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,090 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я как-то проспала тот момент, когда бренд Boss стал выпускать такие актуальные вещи. Очень достойно и достаточно доступно, если учесть, что качество в Boss было всегда на высоком уровне Пончо, топ, брюки, сумка, юбка, ботильоны, пальто, кеды В общем: тут и в офис, и в пир, и в мир можно собраться 👍🏻

❤21🔥8👍6

5 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,110 views29 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Продолжаю обновлять свои бьюти штуковины и сегодня на повестке дня новый сухой шампунь K18, который я взяла на Lamoda с большой скидкой Можно сказать, что это Ролс-Ройс в мире сухих шампуней, и по цене в том числе))) я сама его еще не заценила, но отзывы тут и там видела крайне положительные. Как говорится, посмотрим! 👀

❤19🔥6👍4

5 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,170 views59 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ноябрь с первых дней решил, что #lookoftheday не стоит и пытаться претендовать на звание фэшн, но мы как-нибудь приспособимся А пока на мне: • пуховик 12 STOREEZ (архив) • свитер LIMÉ (архив) • джинсы ZARINA (а выглядят не хуже Pervert) • ботильоны EKONIKA • сумка LOEWE • и шапка в кармане:)

❤35🔥15👍8🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 14:46 UTC680 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Та самая подруга, которая всегда немного экстра — теперь в формате канала Громкая Роскошь: — крейзи находки в брендах. Никакой скучной базы и минимализма! — свежее вдохновение наряжаться — топ по мнению читателей: образы админки и её 🐩. Она реально ходит во всех этих пайетках и перьях каждый день 🙀 Рекомендую канал Саши, чтобы жить каждый день как праздник!

❤14👍4🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC865 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @we_go_shoppingPhoto

если бы я хотела свой бренд одежды, я бы подписалась на аккаунт Paris Wycherley ❤️

❤22🔥8😍6

3 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,180 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Кто ждал от меня рекомендацию аналога известного молочка для волос — ликуйте! Я нашла такое для себя у Skinjestique У молочка плотная, приятная текстура: легко распределяется, не липнет и помогает пригладить пушистость. Особенно понравится волосам средней пористости. А аромат — отдельная история: пряные табачные ноты и свежий бергамот звучат изысканно Молочко отлично подойдёт для ухода за поврежденной длиной и для …

❤20🔥8👍5

2 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,160 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Совершенно неожиданно для себя нашла классные позиции в Gloria Jeans, которые отлично смотрятся в жизни, а не только на фото: брюки-алладины / бордовые джинсы / пушистый джемпер Заметила, что джинсы здесь сильно маломерят — девочкам-тростинкам рекомендую присмотреться. Я на себе мерила 42/44 размеры, хотя мой 34/36

❤34🔥13😍8

2 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,270 views30 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

И снова здравствуй, рубрика «пустые банки» Все удачное и классное, все обожаемое, но вот сухой шампунь Original Minerals не хочу повторять из-за его сильного аромата, который мне совсем не зашел И я нашла достойную и доступную альтернативу молочку Davines — расскажу об этом позже;)

❤24👍3🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,460 views50 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Вчера гуляли 4 часа, сегодня 2,5 — кажется, мы взяли от этой роскошной осени всё за эти дни! А завтра обещают уже дубак 🥶 #lookoftheday был такой: шубка находка прошлогодняя на авито / брюки Voishe / свитер LIME / носки Uniqlo / лоферы 12 STOREEZ / шапка Ruxara (lamoda) / очки Ray-ban / сумка Loewe

❤34😍9🔥7

1 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,630 views43 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Девчата, в LIMÉ появились просто офигенные бутылочно-зеленые сапоги — цвет точь-в-точь как Pitkina x Ekonika, роскошь💚 Очень удобные, каблук совсем не чувствуется. Тем, кто хочет разнообразить свой черно-коричневый обувной гараж на осень/зиму советую: красивые и не банальные сапоги! Юбка, кстати, тоже супер, но я промахнулась с размером — она просто спадет с меня (на мне S)

❤27🔥8😍8

30 Oct 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,760 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Пора детских утренников объявляется открытой, а по тому надо запасаться нарядами для юных принцесс, ведь впереди в нас ждет много праздников и новогодних елок! Очень симпатичные наряды для маленьких леди обнаружила в Gloria Jeans — тот самый случай, когда красиво и доступно;) Хочу из новой коллекции буквально каждую вещь для Сашули: нарядные платья, фактурные юбочки и пушистые топы. Милота невероятная 😍

❤29😍9💯6

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @meandsandrabulo4ka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @meandsandrabulo4ka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Наташа, соберись
@natashagidlevskaya · 21,376
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Olyaa_
@olyaa_katuyshinaa · 32,442
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
kate.katkova
@katekatkova · 75,453
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
workout_masha
@workout_masha · 20,432
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 26 September 2026
а если с детьми?
@babyfriendly · 27,461
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
такие женские дела
@arhipovadashaa · 27,636
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
Модный маркетолог
@moda_marketingg · 32,305
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Вкусные тарелочки. Детские рецепты
@vkysnayatarelochka · 25,399
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
KAKDELA BABY
@mariakakdelababy · 33,491
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
МамТань
@tatipetrishcheva17 · 33,760
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
Kids Club. Стрелец-Молодец
@streletskids · 48,399
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
ЛЕГКО В ДЕКРЕТЕ
@legko_v_dekrete · 30,910
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
Город для детей
@dekretnye_budni · 19,188
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 October 2026
DocDeti & DocMed
@docdeti_docmed · 62,962
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
for Mími
@formimistyle · 30,897
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Малыш кушает с Алёной Перовой
@malysh_kyshaet · 22,034
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мари и Сандра Булочка” (@meandsandrabulo4ka), 17,245 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meandsandrabulo4ka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.