Photo, posted without a caption
🤪5🔥3🎉1

Channel
@evgenyrak_blog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
691subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918805496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evgenyrak_blog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evgenyrak_blog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 691 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 694 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 696 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 697 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 698 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 700 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 700 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
218 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 34.9% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 32.6% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 22.5% | |
| 🤪 | 8 | 3.67% | |
| custom 5373015670822804395 | 6 | 2.75% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.459% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.459% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evgenyrak_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤪5🔥3🎉1
Posted without readable text
👍4❤3🔥2
Есть шансы на камбек 🔥🔥🔥
🔥4
Вчера решил сделать, казалось бы, максимально простую штуку - освежить себе телегу. Поменять фон в чатах, чуть подкрутить цвета, чтобы всё выглядело не как стандартная больничная палата для переписок, а как нормальное рабочее место под меня. Нашёл картинку. Чёрная, сочная, прям вайб. Смотрю на неё и такой: Все хочу её на фон. Поставил. И тут начался цирк с конями. Потому что сама картинка — пушка. А вот цвета …
❤2👍2🔥1
Осваиваю вайбкодинг, и решил начать с себя. Крутая тема для разработки чего угодно. Цель была - собрать всю инфу по мне и продуктам в одном месте, ну и оформить презентабильно)) Я просто говорил в голосовых, что хочу. - Сделай блок вот так - Фон должен дышать, но не бешено - Собери форму заявки А код писал Claude Code. Я смотрел результат в браузере и говорил либо «вот так», либо «нет, переделай». И это какой-то…
❤8👍3🔥2
Поменял бота на раковину. Серьезно. Делал ремонт в санузле. Плитка серая, всё в одном стиле, но не хотелось воткнуть в это какое-нибудь дешёвое решение, чтобы потом каждый раз заходить и плеваться. И вот повис этот вопрос грузом: какую раковину поставить, какую столешницу. Реально ломал голову. Сижу, листаю рилсы в инсте. Залип. И попадаю на ребят, которые делают деревянные раковины. Это ультрас красиво. Прям то,…
❤9🔥4🤩3
Делал клиенту видосик для анонса практикума по ИИ. Получилось, как по мне - жирно! Как считаешь? Жир?
🔥9❤4👍2
Начался хер знает какой день нашей новостройки))) Хотел бы поделиться новостями с полей ремонта - уже чистовыми Может показаться, что за год этого маловато, но работы сделано оч много особенно когда ты один. Крч хвастаюсь первыми чистовиками))
❤8🔥7👍6👏1
В прошлом году меня был жертвой мошенников и минусанул миллион.... И это был не просто «неприятный эпизод». Это были деньги, которые я откладывал на ремонт. План был простой: заплатить, и пусть люди сделают. Но жизнь решила, что я слишком расслабился. В итоге я оказался дома без денег и без варианта «нанять кого-то». И знаешь, что остаётся в такой ситуации? Правильно. Делать самому. Хотя я вообще нихера не пони…
❤10👍6🔥3
Хотел бы развеять один миф, связанный с ботами в MAX. Типо, на каких-то конструкторах, он, якобы, отлетает, а на каких-то все норм. Это пиздеж Собрал уже более 10-ти воронок там, и ниразу ничего не отщелкнулось, да и почему это должно произойти - хз. Ток если настройки в кабинете бизнес-макс сбросить 🤷♂️ Это как трафогоны в ВК любят байки травить, типо если вести на сенлер, то лиды дешевле 🤣 Звучит как оправда…
👍4❤2🔥1
Есть штука, которую я пока не слышал, чтобы кто-то называл по имени. Назову "технологическим ФОМО". Смотри, как это работает на моём примере. • Раньше баннер — это дизайнер, часы работы. Сейчас я сам, за 10 минут, через Nano Banana. • Раньше моушен, видеогенерации — это вообще была другая планета, другой бюджет, другие люди. Сейчас я это делаю сам. • Аватары, фото, тексты, автоматизации, AI-агенты — всё это теперь…
❤7🔥6👍4
😂😂😂
custom 53730156708228043956❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @evgenyrak_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бог автоворонок | Евгений Рак” (@evgenyrak_blog), 691 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgenyrak_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.