Channel
@maryprotext
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001570872185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maryprotext |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maryprotext |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 160 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 160 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
304 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 142 | 46.7% | |
| ❤ | 97 | 31.9% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 7.57% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 6.91% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 4.28% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2024 to 24 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это ночной экспертный дозор, всем выйти из сумрака! Короче, я решила, что хватит уже отмазываться 168%-ной загрузкой на работе и в быту, и пора вернуть этот канал к жизни. Уже завтра тут будет кое-что классное, а пока — маякуйте огоньками, кто живой 🔥🔥🔥
🔥14❤3👍3
Я сегодня на нетворкинге! Для тех, кто только присоединился — меня зовут Мария, я копирайтер. Пишу тексты на заказ и помогаю другим научиться писать. ✔️ Если вы не знаете, о чём писать ✔️ Не понимаете, что интересно вашей аудитории ✅ Хотите продвигать свои услуги через соцсети — могу помочь с этими и другими запросами. В комментариях можно и нужно рассказать о себе. Здесь и здесь подсказки, как это сделать
❤2👍1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
📣 3 секрета продаж в соцсетях, которые на самом деле нужно знать Спасибо за 15 реакций! Меняю их на обещанный пост 1️⃣ Первое и самое главное: нужно реально въехать в проблемы своей аудитории. Не те, которые мы сами себе придумали, а настоящие. Можно бесконечно думать, что наши клиенты — это люди, которые интересуются саморазвитием. Но если по факту им гораздо важнее, чтобы муж проводил вечера дома, а не в гараже — …
❤7🔥4👍3
Вам не нужно учиться писать тексты! «Ой, я не умею писать красивые тексты, мне не дано», - кручинятся эксперты, что им не дано постичь секреты копирайтинга. Облегчу вам жизнь: и не надо. Большинству экспертов для продажи своих услуг нафиг не всрались точные метафоры, ёмкие гиперболы и прочая литературщина. Оставьте всё это писателям. ❗️Достаточно разобраться буквально с 3 пунктами — и привлекать новых клиентов ста…
❤18👍3🔥3
Врываемся в новую неделю с мощными инфоповодами Если вы, как и я, давно не писали в блоге или канале, то вот эти горячие пирожочки — отличный вариант вернуться без нытья «ой, что-то меня тут давно не было». Погнали 👇 ✏️ Юре Борисову не дали «Оскара», но все остальные награды «Анора» получила Сама по себе церемония уже громкое событие: тут нам и популярные фильмы, и звёзды, и всратые роскошные наряды. На одних мем…
👍5❤2🔥2😁1
Простой способ освоить кликбейт Посмотрите это видео: там всё максимально понятно 😉 В комментариях можете поделиться кликбейтными заголовками, которые зацепили вас в последнее время. Я пополняю свою копилочку)))
🔥6❤5🤩4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥21❤7👏6
«Давайте потыкаем их палкой» С этим предложением на планёрке ко мне обратилась руководитель отдела маркетинга. Речь шла о том, что читатели не особо охотно открывают рассылку в период продаж, а значит, не покупают курс. Сказать «ну и чёрт с вами» мы не можем, план сам себя не сделает. Значит, надо как-то обратить на себя внимание. ❓Как потыкать палкой каждого из 60-тысячной базы? Конечно, цепляющим заголовком. Мы…
❤5🔥5🤩4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5🔥2👍1
Как сантехника помогла осознать одну важную вещь про экспертов Рассказала в этом видео 👆 А ещё напомнила, что жду на бесплатный разбор текстов. 4 места из 10 уже заняты. Подробности 👉здесь👈
🔥4🤩3❤2
Осталось 9 мест на разборы 😉
🔥4❤2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maryprotext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кстати, хотите годный лайфхак, который поможет представить себя в самом выгодном свете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2024 to 24 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,093,261 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пох*й, пишем! | Мария Черкасова” (@maryprotext), 160 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maryprotext.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.