Институт международных исследований МГИМО: исследования, аналитика и прогнозы ведущих российских экспертов по международной тематике.
Запросы СМИ и партнёрства: https://t.me/imi_mgimo?direct
Поддержать канал «бустом»: https://t.me/boost/imi_mgimo
Created
26 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,439–7,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:32
7,441
+2
9 Aug 2026, 08:33
7,439
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:07
7,440
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:49
7,440
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 7,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.504%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
24 (20 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
39,310
Reactions total
189
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈558
Videos
≈1
Links
≈2,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68
37.2%
👍
43
23.5%
❤🔥
32
17.5%
🔥
26
14.2%
👏
12
6.56%
😱
2
1.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imi_mgimo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 Мекканское соглашение — контуры новой региональной архитектуры на Ближнем Востоке — статья Артёма Адрианова @arab_countries:
▪Мекканское соглашение предусматривает, что вооружённое нападение на одно из государств-участников будет рассматриваться как нападение на всех. Однако его текст не опубликован, а конкретные объёмы и характер поддержки в случае кризиса, по словам главы МИД Турции Хакана Фидана, будут опр…
🇪🇸 Что показал миграционный кризис в испанской Сеуте — статья Артёма Соколова @GeRussia:
▪Миграционный кризис в испанской Сеуте удалось в основном погасить на ранней стадии: большая часть мигрантов вернулась в Марокко, часть осталась на территории эксклава в надежде позднее перебраться в континентальную Европу. При этом сама ситуация показала, насколько быстро локальный эпизод способен вновь актуализировать для ЕС т…
🌍 Новая точка на карте стажировок ИМИ МГИМО
В 2025 году ИМИ перезапустил программу зарубежных научных стажировок сотрудников Института. В этом году мы продолжаем программу и расширяем её географию.
Совсем скоро двое наших коллег отправятся на научную стажировку в новую точку на карте зарубежных стажировок ИМИ.
А пока предлагаем угадать — куда именно?
💡 Подсказка: современное название этой страны появилось в 1964 …
🇬🇪 Грузия на пути к независимости: структурные ограничения стратегического выбора — глава Ирины Болговой в новом докладе РСМД:
▪Динамику грузинской государственности после 1991 года можно рассматривать через смену постсоветских порядков и теорию «периферийного реализма». Каждый порядок создавал для Грузии свой набор ограничений и возможностей, внутри которых национальные элиты принимали стратегические решения.
▪В р…
🇪🇺 22-й пакет ЕС будет нацелен на борьбу с обходом санкций — комментарии Егора Сергеева и Екатерины Араповой:
Екатерина Арапова:
▪В Брюсселе сосредоточились на повышении эффективности уже введённых мер, поскольку возможностей для расширения секторальных санкций не осталось. Новые рестрикции затронут как российские, так и зарубежные организации-посредники: в 21-й пакет ЕС уже включены 15 компаний из Китая и ещё 11 с…
🛡⚔️ Новая система безопасности: мир движется к военным блокам — интервью с Александром Князевым @orientalreviewAK:
▪Американское военное присутствие на Ближнем Востоке никогда не было стабилизирующим фактором, а происходящие процессы имеют долгосрочный характер и тенденцию к географическому расширению. Примером обратной динамики стало улучшение ситуации с безопасностью и внутренней стабильностью в Афганистане после…
☀️ Лето в МГИМО — время школ
Пока в Университете и его подразделениях продолжается сезон летних образовательных программ, предлагаем вспомнить, как год назад прошла III Летняя школа ИМИ МГИМО.
24–29 июня 2025 года она объединила 27 молодых исследователей из ведущих образовательных учреждений и научных организаций. Программа была посвящена международным отношениям и параметрам конкуренции за технологическое лидерств…
🇦🇲 Куда поведёт Никол Пашинян Армению в следующие пять лет — комментарий Николая Силаева:
▪В новой каденции армянским властям придётся приспосабливаться к постепенному сокращению торгово-экономического взаимодействия с ЕАЭС. Ранее Пашинян исходил из убеждения, что для Москвы принципиально важно сохранение интеграционных процессов на постсоветском пространстве, а от Еревана якобы зависит судьба экономического союза, …
🗣 Неформальная консультативная встреча глав государств Центральной Азии и Азербайджана — комментарий Александра Князева @orientalreviewAK:
▪От встречи не стоит ожидать прорывных решений. Консультативные встречи президентов стран Центральной Азии традиционно отличаются обширностью повесток, размытостью формулировок итоговых документов и отсутствием практических результатов, поэтому оснований рассчитывать на неординар…
🇩🇪 Как «нестандартное отцовство» привело к кадровой чехарде в Германии — комментарий Артёма Соколова @GeRussia:
▪Отставка Йенса Шпана запустила перестановки в правительстве, однако давать оценки действиям Фридриха Мерца пока сложно. Возможно, за счёт новых назначений он пытается создать ощущение замены людей, неэффективных в проведении обещанных реформ, на более подходящих.
▪Пока эффект оказался противоположным: пе…
Институт международных исследований МГИМО поздравляет Делегацию Российской Федерации на переговорах в Вене по вопросам военной безопасности и контроля над вооружениями с 30-летием!
Поздравляем руководителя Делегации Юлию Жданову и весь коллектив с юбилеем и желаем дальнейших профессиональных успехов в отстаивании интересов России в сфере международной безопасности и контроля над вооружениями.
К этой дате предлагаем…
❤5🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @imi_mgimo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,911 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@imi_mgimo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@izvestia named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИМИ МГИМО” (@imi_mgimo), 7,441 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imi_mgimo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.