Channel
@sohk_1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
292subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002078742885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sohk_1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sohk_1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 292 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 294 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 294 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
154 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 63 | 40.9% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 13.0% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 9.74% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.25% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2025 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Post-America: The Mechanics of Change in Politics and Social Life of the United States Personal news: I have written a book. It's about 3 things. 👉 History of ideas that once shaped America. How did they appear, evolve and acquired new meanings. 👉Stories of the people whose ideas and hands once built America (and continue to do so) - writers, thinkers, inventors, travelers, entrepreneurs, soldiers, diplomats, acti…
🔥10🏆2👍2
Donald Trump's Board of Peace Charter: How to Run the World without Involving Orderlies The Full text of the so called Board of Peace Charter (for some reason first published by Israeli newspaper). Two immediate takeaways: 👉No mention of Gaza. Which is telling you the whole thing is not about Gaza. 👉 Trump decides who joins. You have to pay (A LOT) to join: Article 2.2: Member State Responsibilities (c) Each Membe…
❤4🔥3👍2
Why America needs Venezuela in 3 pictures
👍3❤2🔥2👎1🤔1😱1
Bosom Enemies, Bitter Friends: What Relationship Framework are Russia and the US Doomed to? Here's my take on some of the key thorny issues in US-Russia relations. Some of them have fundamentally altered the very character of the relationship compared to the Cold War era. The post-Cold War era is over. The world faces yet another historic inflection point. US-Russia relations are no longer central to global interna…
❤2🔥2👍1
🎙⚛️ Diplomacy in Turbulent Times | Rafael Mariano Grossi Check out the new episode of the "Foreign Policy" podcast by @imi_mgimo. In this episode, the podcast Editor-in-Chief Sofia Babkina sat down with IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi to discuss many aspects of multilateral diplomacy in turbulent times. Time Stamps: 00:52 Diplomacy as a true calling 03:05 Is multilateral diplomacy in decline? 04:53 IA…
🔥6❤5👍2
How European leaders seek to "Bidenize" Trump? As the Europeans and Zelensky seek to rematch the Alaska summit results and "Bidenize" Trump into continuing to support Ukraine, I sat down with Rick Sanchez of @rtnews to talk over what comes next for the conflict and US-Russia relations. Click here for the full interview.
❤6👍3🔥2😁1
How Decades of Folly Led to War in Ukraine As the crisis in Ukraine enters its arguably most interesting diplomatic play, it's time to make sense of why Donald Trump has every reason to end it. A good friend and colleague Michael Reynolds of Princeton University nails it on the head in his latest take for Compact. Far from delivering the “great prize” of Ukraine to the West, the Euromaidan tore the country apart as …
🔥5❤3👍3
Putin-Trump Summit in Alaska: What to Watch? In the run-up to the US-Russia talks in Alaska I sat down with the Stimson Center,a Washington-based think tank, to talk through the issues that will potentially be discussed by the two presidents. Have a listen.
🔥6👏5❤4
This is how trends in global trade have changed over the years. China filled in the void left by the EU, US largely remains where it was.
🔥7👍1
Briefly on American decision making vis-a-vis Iran
😁8❤1🔥1
Podcast: What Does Russia Want? Today's attack on parts of Russia's nuclear triad are astonishing. But what's Moscow's endgame in the conflict eventually? I sat down with Peter Slezkine of the Stimson Center to talk it all over. Have a listen. Time Stamps: 01:08 Evaluate the Russia-Ukraine talks and the Trump-Putin phone call 03:17 Why does Russia oppose an immediate ceasefire? 08:08 What are Russia’s core objectiv…
❤4🔥3⚡2👍1
In case you read Italian (or use Google translator at a professional level) here's my extended interview to a chief Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera on Russia's attitude towards President Trump drive towards peace efforts and possible deal between Moscow and Washington. DISCLAIMER: The attribution to me as a "counselor of the Kremlin" is a pure fantasy of the editors. This administration is indeed moving very …
❤6🔥5😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sohk_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,094,556 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sohk_1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“School of Hard Knocks” (@sohk_1), 292 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sohk_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.