Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Nana

Channel

Crypto Nana

@icryptonana

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

153,038subscribers

-20,176 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001899566916
TypeChannel
Username@icryptonana
DescriptionАвторский взгляд на то, как зарабатывать* в крипте. Игры, гамбл, NFT, проекты, трейдинг, майнинг, мемы, web3, дропы, тестнеты, конкурсы и раздачи на канале. Для связи: @tonogolik, @nanakulikova *Не является фин. рек.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/icryptonana

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

153,038173,214163,1266 August 2026 — 173,214 subscribers6 August 2026 — 173,214 subscribers6 August 2026 — 173,086 subscribers7 August 2026 — 172,887 subscribers8 August 2026 — 172,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 172,399 subscribers10 August 2026 — 172,164 subscribers11 August 2026 — 172,021 subscribers12 August 2026 — 172,989 subscribers14 August 2026 — 172,806 subscribers15 August 2026 — 167,012 subscribers17 August 2026 — 162,416 subscribers18 August 2026 — 162,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 162,255 subscribers20 August 2026 — 161,295 subscribers21 August 2026 — 161,078 subscribers22 August 2026 — 160,735 subscribers24 August 2026 — 160,402 subscribers25 August 2026 — 160,285 subscribers26 August 2026 — 160,105 subscribers27 August 2026 — 159,971 subscribers28 August 2026 — 159,686 subscribers29 August 2026 — 159,512 subscribers30 August 2026 — 159,295 subscribers31 August 2026 — 159,061 subscribers1 September 2026 — 163,525 subscribers2 September 2026 — 163,246 subscribers3 September 2026 — 163,006 subscribers5 September 2026 — 163,761 subscribers8 September 2026 — 163,037 subscribers11 September 2026 — 159,336 subscribers13 September 2026 — 158,688 subscribers15 September 2026 — 157,248 subscribers17 September 2026 — 156,870 subscribers26 September 2026 — 153,038 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -20,176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150,012–176,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 03:01153,038-3,832
17 Sept 2026, 07:38156,870-378
15 Sept 2026, 04:38157,248-1,440
13 Sept 2026, 10:15158,688-648
11 Sept 2026, 12:38159,336-3,701
8 Sept 2026, 17:40163,037-724
5 Sept 2026, 12:40163,761+755
3 Sept 2026, 15:14163,006-240
2 Sept 2026, 10:33163,246-279
1 Sept 2026, 08:36163,525+4,464
31 Aug 2026, 07:34159,061-234
30 Aug 2026, 10:35159,295-217
29 Aug 2026, 09:42159,512-174
28 Aug 2026, 10:34159,686-285
27 Aug 2026, 08:06159,971-134
26 Aug 2026, 06:44160,105-180
25 Aug 2026, 06:55160,285-117
24 Aug 2026, 09:11160,402-333
22 Aug 2026, 16:55160,735-343
21 Aug 2026, 04:37161,078first reading

Engagement

195 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.94%
avg views ÷ 153,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,570
112 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.441%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
112
of 195 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held195 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total847,350
Reactions total3,741
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,600
Videos
≈197
Links
≈2,670

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,094 reactions across 191 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,47934.9%
❤1,67923.7%
🔥1,29918.3%
❤‍🔥5688.01%
😎4956.98%
🐳2543.58%
💯1802.54%
🤔731.03%
👀260.367%
😈240.338%
👾130.183%
⚡20.028%
😍10.014%
🙏10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 193 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @icryptonana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 195 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC≈5,180 views30 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Открылись! ‼️ Заходим 👉 @pixel_mania Выбиваем телеграм подарочки и не только! Все просто и знакомо! ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

👍9❤8❤‍🔥7🐳4🔥2

26 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈5,450 views30 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Напоминалочка субботняя. Кто стейкает в Rolls, не забудьте сегодня сделать обязательные выигрышные прокруты для депа! А у кого есть мороженки золотых драконов - тем достаточны любые прокруты! ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

❤10👍10🔥7😎3

25 Sept 2026, 23:10 UTC≈4,990 views27 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Играйте в игры. Выигрывайте Pepe ☺️ Турнир по играм Portals Games начинается прямо сейчас. У каждого есть шанс.

🔥8❤‍🔥7❤6👍6

25 Sept 2026, 22:03 UTC≈5,390 views31 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

В новой бета-версии Telegram для macOS при отправке Gram появилась информация о связанном с аккаунтом адресе кошелька. Также был добавлен список действий по долгому нажатию на адрес кошелька: 🔵Отправить деньги 🔵Копировать адрес 🔵Посмотреть в Эксплорере ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽9…

🔥11❤6❤‍🔥5👍5😎4

25 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC≈5,630 views44 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Кто не поленился из рефов и кинул пруф скрин в комментариях - тот и получил (рандомайзером)! А надо то было всего лишь зайти в новую игрушку STRAY CLASH от DOGS! Поздравляю! В игре кстати разобралась и уже иду на призовые места в серебряной лиге! Очень красочный карточный пвп! Ну всегда правда находятся желающие бороться в поединке..) Так что вливайтесь активнее - пока там не так сложно занять топы! В бронзовой ли…

❤18😎9👍6🔥6❤‍🔥3👾2

25 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC≈5,380 views30 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

💛 Цифровой Кошелек Алтын поямо внутри телеграм: карты, оплата и переводы на одном балансе Цифровой рубль уже у Путина на планерках, а ты все еще не разобрался с usdt? Карта и кошелёк Алтын - твой надежный легальный помощник, опора и друг. Сколько стоит: 🟡 Международная карта: выпуск всего 999 ₽ (с промокодом CRYPTONANA - еще дешевле), обслуживание 0 ₽, покупки без комиссии 🟡 Рублёвая карта: выпуск и обслуживание…

👍12❤10❤‍🔥6😎2

25 Sept 2026, 02:36 UTC≈5,770 views31 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Вот такие подарочки лутаю в Rolls! Загадаем желания на призы, рубимся в PvP / Solo и кайфуем!

👍12🔥9❤7❤‍🔥3

25 Sept 2026, 00:44 UTC≈6,130 views29 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Чтобы не волноваться их-за своих $ на Битгет, спросонья пошла стресс снимать в Арену на PortalsGames, помогает 🫶 ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

👍15❤‍🔥9🔥5

25 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC≈5,940 views28 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Проспала я взлом битгет, сил ребятам, бабки как и у всех там застряли, это олна из двух моих основных бирж последние пару лет, думаю через 24 часа будут разморожены, как и обещано. Битгету верю. ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

❤11👍8❤‍🔥6😎3

23 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC≈6,010 views28 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Дорого? Дёшево? Купили 3 Scared Cat на чёрном фоне за 16,160 Gram (~$23 775): 🐈‍⬛ https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-2433 🐈‍⬛ https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-1451 🐈‍⬛ https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-3145 ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

👍9❤8❤‍🔥7🔥4

23 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈6,010 views35 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

PortalsGames накормили обедом. Норм залетела на победную серию 😌 ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - AltynWallet и 💳 для всего за ₽999 | Чатик

❤13❤‍🔥7🔥7👍3😎3🐳2

23 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈6,240 views35 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

💰 ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ В СТЕЙКИНГЕ ROLLS 🍦 Легендарные мороженки получили x3 буст! Теперь APR этих гифтов умножается на 3. 🎮 Условия стейкинга для держателей драконов стали проще. Теперь достаточно просто играть в PvP от 0,5 GRAM. Выигрывать необязательно! Стейкать стало ещё приятнее 😏 ___________________ Играем и лутаем 🎁 в: Portals, Rolls | Меняем 💵 безопасно без kyc в Hermes | Лёгкий обмен USDT в ₽ в один клик - Al…

🔥10👍7❤6🐳5😎4❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @icryptonana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@icryptonana edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Sept 2026, 19:40 UTCAnonymous Poll188 voters

Выбираем лучший PvE-режим в Rolls! 🔫

  1. Crash 🛸18%
  2. Upgrade 🤩24%
  3. Limbo 💃7%
  4. Mono 1️⃣12%
  5. Lucky 🍀28%
  6. Custom Rolls 🤖11%
  7. Hi Lo ⬆️⬇️11%
  8. Базовый Ролл 👍30%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Nana” (@icryptonana), 153,038 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icryptonana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.