Bizning kitoblar fikrlashni o‘zgartiradi.
📍 Chilonzor, Shuhrat chorrahasi
📍 Chorsu, Toshkent kitob markazi
Bog'lanish uchun: +998956779911
Hamkorlik uchun: +998770479908
Created
26 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2,716. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,313–40,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:55
37,720
-186
19 Sept 2026, 13:38
37,906
-54
17 Sept 2026, 02:59
37,960
-9
15 Sept 2026, 00:21
37,969
+66
13 Sept 2026, 09:38
37,903
-5
11 Sept 2026, 12:17
37,908
-66
8 Sept 2026, 16:58
37,974
-261
5 Sept 2026, 07:17
38,235
-118
3 Sept 2026, 13:57
38,353
-123
2 Sept 2026, 06:26
38,476
-75
1 Sept 2026, 03:35
38,551
-100
31 Aug 2026, 00:35
38,651
-89
29 Aug 2026, 22:45
38,740
-64
28 Aug 2026, 21:26
38,804
-109
27 Aug 2026, 20:07
38,913
-96
26 Aug 2026, 19:23
39,009
-70
25 Aug 2026, 18:03
39,079
-66
24 Aug 2026, 20:57
39,145
-133
23 Aug 2026, 06:28
39,278
-78
21 Aug 2026, 20:58
39,356
first reading
Engagement
230 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.36%
avg views ÷ 37,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,150
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 230 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 114 of 115 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
230 (2 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
362,463
Reactions total
2,484
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,400
Videos
≈1,770
Links
≈4,780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
43m 41s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 110 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,927 reactions across 229 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,596
52.7%
🔥
958
19.4%
👍
713
14.5%
🕊
147
2.98%
❤🔥
95
1.93%
😍
45
0.913%
💯
42
0.852%
🤩
41
0.832%
😁
37
0.751%
🐳
32
0.649%
👀
29
0.589%
⚡
28
0.568%
🤗
27
0.548%
👏
22
0.447%
😭
13
0.264%
🌚
12
0.244%
😢
10
0.203%
🙊
10
0.203%
🏆
9
0.183%
😱
9
0.183%
16 further kinds
52
1.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 230 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 230 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iBook_uz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 230 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 20 000 — bu shunchaki raqam emas.
Bu biz bilan birga o‘qigan, tinglagan, o‘ylagan va izlangan 20 ming inson. YouTube kanalimiz 20 ming obunachiga yetdi! 🤍
Har bir obuna, ko‘rish va fikringiz biz uchun katta qo‘llab-quvvatlash. Oldinda bundan ham ko‘proq foydali suhbatlar, kitoblar va yangi loyihalar bor.
Biz bilan ekaningiz uchun rahmat!
🎞 Ibook youtube kanaliga obuna bo’ling.
@ibook_uz
💙 Arkadiyning bitta g‘oyasi bor edi: boy bo‘lish.
Uning nazarida pul shunchaki boylik emas. Pulga ega bo‘lish — hech kimga qaram bo‘lmaslik, o‘z hayotini o‘zi boshqarish va istaganicha yashash degani edi.
Ammo Arkadiy boylikka erishish yo‘lida tobora bir narsani anglay boshlaydi: insonni mustaqil qiladigan narsa faqat pulmi?
- Xo‘sh, Arkadiy o‘z “g‘oyasi”ga yetadimi?
- Bu savolga javobni “O’smir” kitobidan olasiz……
📕 Bugun soat 20:00
Ustoz Abror Muxtor Aliy bilan Imom G'azzoliyning "Mukoshafatul qulub" kitobi to'liq nashr ilk bor arab tilidan tarjima qilingan kitob haqida suhbatlashdik.
Kitob ming yil oldin yozilgan. Lekin suhbatdagi savollarning hammasi bugunniki:
— Nega yangi telefon chiqsa, eskisi ishlab turgani bilan baribir olamiz?
— Aloqani qarindoshing uzgan bo'lsa, nega tiklash sening zimmangda?
— Alloh qaysi gunohga…
🤩 Dostoyevskiyning eng yaxshi kitobi — keyingisidir.
Chunki uning har bir asari inson qalbining ilgari ochilmagan bir qatlamini ko‘rsatadi.
Endi esa navbat — “O‘smir”da.
Mustaqil bo‘lishni, katta pul topishni, o‘z yo‘lini topishni istagan, ammo ichki qarama-qarshiliklar ichida qolgan yosh yigitning hikoyasi.
“O‘smir” — tez kunda...
@ibook_uz
🫀Ilm va qalb birlashadigan davra…
Sizni “Tirilish” nashriyotida chop etilgan “Mukoshafatul qulub” kitobining taqdimotiga taklif qilamiz.
Ushbu uchrashuvda kitob, qalb tarbiyasi, insonning ichki dunyosi va ma’naviy kamoloti haqida mehmon spikerlarimiz bilan suhbatlashamiz. Birgalikda ilm va tafakkurga boy samimiy davrada bo‘lamiz.
Taqdimot mehmonlari:
🔴Abror Muxtor Aliy
🔴Nigora Hasanova
🔴Abdurahmon Umarov
🔴Java Ras…
🤍 Bir lahza to‘xtang…
Odamlardan uzoqlashing.
Dunyoviy shovqinni pasaytiring va qalbingizni tinglang.
Chunki qalb ham oziqqa muhtoj.
Uning ozig’i esa — zikr, tafakkur, tavba va Robbisiga yaqinlikdir.
“Mukoshafatul qulub” kitobi sizga ko’makchi bo’lsin…
Muqova: qattiq;
Format: A4;
Sahifalar soni: 688;
Narxi: 99.000;
Buyurtma uchun ⤵️
💬 Telegram | 📷 Instagram | 🍇 Uzum
@ibook_uz
“Jinoyat va jazo”, “Iblislar”, “O‘smir” — uch roman, uch xil ichki kurash.
🪓 “Jinoyat va jazo”da Raskolnikov o‘zining g‘oyasi bilan inson hayoti o‘rtasidagi chegarani sinaydi. “Men boshqalardan ustunmanmi?” degan savol uni jinoyatga olib boradi. Keyin esa vijdon, ayb va tavba bilan yuzma-yuz keladi.
🔱 “Iblislar”da esa masala yanada kattalashadi. Bu safar insonning ichki inqirozi butun jamiyat, siyosiy g‘oyalar va r…
🤩 “Qachonki meni to’g’ri yo’lga soluvchi, menga yordam beruvchi, menga to’g’ri maslahatlar beruvchi biriga ehtiyojim tug’ilsa, men “Mukoshafatul qulub”ni qidiraman”.
🔐 “Mukoshafatul Qulub” endi to’liq nashrda !!!
Ushbu kitob inson qalbi va ruhiy holati bilan bog‘liq ko‘plab illatlar, ularning sabablari va ulardan xalos bo‘lish yo‘llari haqida so‘z yurituvchi asar.
“Mukoshafatul Qulub” — siz uchun ham to’g’ri yo’lga…
- “O‘smir”ni intiqlik bilan kutyapsiz-a?
- Biz ham kutyapmiz…
Ammo bu oddiy kutish emas.
“Jinoyat va jazo”, “Telba”, “Aka-uka Karamazovlar”dan so‘ng navbat — Dostoyevskiyning yana bir murakkab va ruhiy kechinmalarga boy asariga.
“ O‘smir” — Dostoyevskiyning o‘zbek tilidagi asarlar turkumiga yakunlaridan biri.
Tez kunda. Kutganingizga arziydigan kitob.
@ibook_uz
Napoleonni buyuk qilgan ayol kim edi? ✨
Napoleon Bonapartning buyuk shaxs sifatida shakllanishida uning onasi Letitsiya Ramolino Bonapartning o‘rni beqiyos edi.
Qat’iyatli, irodasi kuchli va mashaqqatlarga bardoshli Letitsiya farzandlarini intizom va sabr ruhida tarbiyaladi. U Napoleonning xarakteri va dunyoqarashi shakllanishida muhim rol o‘ynadi.
Napoleonning o‘zi esa keyinchalik shunday degan:
“Hayotimdagi barc…
Dunyo xaritasiga qarab siyosatni tushunish mumkinmi? 🌍
«Geografiya qasosi» kitobi taqdimotida siyosat, geografiya va Markaziy Osiyoning geosiyosiy o‘rni haqida qizg‘in suhbat bo‘lib o‘tdi.
Kitob muharriri, tarjimoni va siyosatshunoslar ishtirokidagi eng qiziqarli fikrlar va bahslarni videoda tomosha qiling.
To'liq suhbat premyerasi: 23-sentyabr, soat 19:00
Ibook YouTubeda sahifasida!
Ko’rish uchun bosing 👈🏻
Ko’ri…
❤11👍9🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @iBook_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iBook_uz edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Speaking for IELTS | Lifestyle @Khusan57 · 98,973#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Asaxiy Books | Kitoblar @asaxiybooks · 20,868 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 September 2026
Mutolaa @mutolaaxona · 86,044 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
Birga kitob o‘qiymiz @kitobxonyoshlar · 96,618 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
Oddiy odamlar | Ibratli dunyo @oddiyodamlar_uz · 53,297 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Kitoblar olami @kitoblar1 · 34,796 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Kitob nuri @kitob_nuri · 28,734 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Anvarov’s blog @anvarovsblog · 43,046 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
Kutubxona™ @Elektron_Kutubxona · 31,924 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
Talaba Yoshlar @talabayoshlar · 15 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iBooK.uz” (@iBook_uz), 37,720 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iBook_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.