Channel
@suxrob_oddiy_odam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
294subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651722522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @suxrob_oddiy_odam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/suxrob_oddiy_odam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 294 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 300 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 300 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,329 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 776 | 58.4% | |
| 🔥 | 216 | 16.3% | |
| ❤ | 207 | 15.6% | |
| 😢 | 45 | 3.39% | |
| 🐳 | 27 | 2.03% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 1.81% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 0.978% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 0.602% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 0.451% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 0.226% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.15% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.075% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.075% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2022 to 25 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitiruvchilarga 50 maslahat. Orzusiga erishgan odamlardan kichik sirlar Sevgi, tashqi ko‘rinish, pul, do‘stlar, imtihonlar, tanqidlar, ovqatlar, qiyin vaziyatlar va kelajakdagi hayotingiz borasida men o‘ylab topmagan maslahatlar. 👉 telegra.ph/uqib-chiqmasang-erinchoqsan-05-24 Bitiruvchilarga ulashing @suxrob_oddiy_odam
👍62❤13😇3🫡2👌1
Nega erkak va ayollarning miyasi kuchi teng bo‘lsa-da, O‘zbekistonda ayollar erkaklarchalik aqlli emas? Koʻpchilik aqlni jinsga bog‘liq deb hisoblaydi. Rafiqasiga past nazar bilan qaraydigan erkaklar bir gapni yoqtirishadi: "erkak miyasi" va "ayol miyasi" bor. Xuddiki "erkak miyasi" yaxshiroq hisob-kitob qiloladi, "ayol miyasi" esa hissiyotlarga berilib ish tutadi. Aslida bu fikrlar — noto‘g‘ri. Fan tadqiqotlari mi…
👍44❤10👎1
🧐 Internetdagi bukblogerlarning kanalini kuzatib, havas qiladi kishi — ular ish, oʻqish, shaxsiy hayotidan tashqari oyiga bir nechta kitob oʻqib, taqriz yozishga ham ulgurishadi. Lekin qanday qilib? Oʻzi rostan oʻqishadimi? Albatta oʻqishadi. Qisqa muddatda koʻp kitob oʻqishning siri esa — oʻqish texnikasi, tez oʻqishni bilishda!😎 Kitobni qanday qilib tez oʻqish mumkin? Ushbu videoda bir necha metodlar ulashishga h…
👍24❤7🔥2
"Jin ursin" effekti haqida 🫤 Tasavvur qiling, oldimizda imtihonlarga tayyorlanmagan abituriyentlar/talabalar turibdi. Keling, ularni 2 guruhga bo‘lamiz. 1-guruh: shu xatosi uchun o‘zini tanqid qilganlar. 2-guruh esa o‘zini kechirganlar. Nima deb o‘ylaysiz, qaysi guruh abituriyentlari va talabalari keyingi imtihonlarga oldindan tayyorlanadigan bo‘lishadi? Logika bizga o‘zini tanqid qilgan talabalar keyingi imtihonga…
👍65❤28🔥15🐳7❤🔥6🤔2😢2😁1
Qachon chet elda o‘qishingizga o‘zingizni tayyor deb hisoblasangiz bo‘ladi? O‘tgan kungi postdan keyin ko‘p odamlar chet elda o‘qish yaxshiroq, ko‘p imkoniyatlar bo‘ladi, yaxshi variant deb javob berishdi. Shundan kelib chiqib sizlarga bir jihatni eslatib o‘tsam. Chet elga borsangiz, bo‘ldi, sizda hammasi zo‘r va oson bo‘lib ketadi degani emas. Chet elga o‘qishga borib, u yerda o‘qishga qiynalayotgan, odamlariga mo…
👍27🌚8❤5🐳2🤔1
Qanday qilib erinchoqlikni yengish mumkin? 🫠 Avval sizga zerikish borasidagi bir qiziqarli tadqiqot haqida so‘zlab beray. Tadqiqotchilar odamlarni elektroshokdan boshqa hech nima yo‘q bo‘lgan xonaga kirgizib, ularning bitta o‘zlarini yolg‘iz qoldirishadi. Keyin: "Agar 15 daqiqa shu xonada o‘zingizga elektroshok tekkizmasangiz, sizga pul mukofoti beramiz", — deyishadi. Nima deb o‘ylaysiz, ko‘pchilik nima qiladi? Tadq…
🔥47👍39❤12
Imtihonlarga samarali tayyorlanish metodlari Esingizda bo‘lsa, 2 oylik kursimiz abituriyentlarga imtihonlarga samarali tayyorlanishiga yordam berib, yaxshi natijalar ko‘rsatgan edi: t.me/suxrob_oddiy_odam/35 Agarda faqatgina ko‘p emas, aql bilan imtihonlarga tayyorlanishni xohlasangiz, o‘sha kursda qo‘llanilgan metodlar tushuntirilgan kurs sotib olsangiz bo‘ladi. Kurs matnli darslardan iborat boʻladi. Ham bu bilan …
👍26🔥8🐳4❤3
O‘qishga kirish uchun, IELTS olish uchun qancha vaqt ketadi? Ko‘pchilik shu savolni berishyapti. Masalan, menda DTMdan maksimal 189 ball to‘plashimga tahminan 480 soat vaqt ketgan. Lekin "Hamma 480 soat o‘qiganlar o‘qishga kirmaydi-ku", deyishingiz mumkin va siz haq bo‘lasiz. Sababi odam necha soat o‘qiganidan muhimroq bir jihat bor. Bu — odamning qanday o‘qigani. Masalan, kimdir 3 yil, kimdir esa 3 oy DTM imtihoni…
👍51🔥12❤7😁2
Odamlar baxtli bo‘lishdan ko‘ra normal bo‘lishga ko‘proq harakat qilishlari haqida Kichkinaligimizdan bizga normal bo‘lish kerakligi o‘rgatiladi. Bu bilan ko‘pchilikdek bo‘lmaslik xato ekanligi (bilmasdan) uqtiriladi. Natijada odam ijtimoiy jonzot bo‘lgani sabab "nenormal" bo‘lishdan qo‘rqadi. Ana endi o‘sha "normal"liklar qandayligini ko‘rib chiqsak: — O‘zbek yigiti dabdabali to‘y o‘tkazishi va mashinasi bo‘lishi …
❤39👍25🐳14🔥14🤔3😁3😢3
Tish chyotkasini kun bo‘yi qo‘lida ko‘tarib yurgan odamni ko‘rganmisiz? Kerak bo‘lmagan holatlarda ham uni ishlatadigan odamni-chi? Men ham ko‘rmaganman. Lekin telefonini kun bo‘yi qo‘lida ko‘tarib yurib, kerak bo‘lmagan holatlarda ham uni ishlatadigan odamni ko‘rganmisiz? Ba’zida o‘zimiz ham telefondan ko‘p foydalanib yuboramiz. Tish chyotkasidan faqatgina kerakli vaqtda foydalanishadi. Qolgan vaqtlarda u o‘z joyi…
👍46😢31🔥12❤8😁4
Qanday qilib bugun ham, ertaga ham, umuman har doim zo‘r odam bo‘lish mumkin? (1-qism: Hayotdagi maqsad) (2-qism: Maqsad tomon harakat) (3-qism: Vaziyatlarga qarshilik) (Siz oxirgi 4-qismdasiz) 4. Zo‘r odamlarning hayotidagi minuslar Odatda zo‘r odamlarda ko‘proq pul, ko‘proq bo‘sh vaqt, o‘zi umuman ko‘proq narsalar bo‘ladi. Orzularidagi hayotda yashashadi, instagramga chiroyli rasmlar qo‘yishadi, oilasi bilan meh…
👍90🔥21❤10🤔5😢3😁1
Qanday qilib bugun ham, ertaga ham, umuman har doim zo‘r odam bo‘lish mumkin? (1-qism: Hayotdagi maqsad) (2-qism: Maqsad tomon harakat) (Siz 3-qismdasiz) 3. Vaziyatlarga qarshilik Buni misol bilan tushuntirib berish osonroq. Tasavvur qiling, kechqurun do’stingizni fastfud kafesiga chaqirdingiz. Do‘stingiz bo‘lsa: "Men hozir ovqatlanishimga e'tibor qilyapman, shuning uchun burger yeyolmayman, lekin sen bilan ko‘ris…
👍31🔥6❤3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @suxrob_oddiy_odam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@suxrob_oddiy_odam named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Suxrob — oddiy odam” (@suxrob_oddiy_odam), 294 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suxrob_oddiy_odam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.