Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kitobchi

Channel

kitobchi

@kitobxoncha

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,623subscribers

-446 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003159718481
TypeChannel
Username@kitobxoncha
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitobxoncha

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6232,0731,8487 August 2026 — 2,069 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,069 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,025 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,952 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,922 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,885 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,846 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,816 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,797 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,761 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,721 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,696 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,675 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1,623 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 53 days, net -446. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,556–2,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 12:581,623-52
18 Sept 2026, 23:371,675-21
14 Sept 2026, 18:191,696-25
11 Sept 2026, 10:381,721-40
6 Sept 2026, 06:381,761-36
2 Sept 2026, 08:261,797-19
29 Aug 2026, 23:031,816-30
26 Aug 2026, 17:231,846-39
23 Aug 2026, 09:111,885-37
20 Aug 2026, 00:421,922-30
16 Aug 2026, 21:461,952-32
13 Aug 2026, 16:091,984-41
10 Aug 2026, 13:232,025-48
7 Aug 2026, 20:382,073+4
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,069no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:082,069first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 28m
Average length
1h 28m

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

772 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 588648471048120578932041.5%
❤12115.7%
custom 532105501044692694811715.2%
🔥658.42%
👍425.44%
😁364.66%
🤔314.02%
🤣253.24%
😐151.94%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 772 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kitobxoncha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC344 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Kichkina shahzoda" va uning "vorisi" "Kichkina shahzoda"ni o'qib, "chuqur falsafiy asar" deysiz. "Bolakay, ko'rsichqon, tulki va tulpor"ni o'qib, "bolalarcha sodda" deysiz. Bu ikki asarni deyarli 80 yil ajratib tursa-da, har ikki asarda ayrim umumiy jihatlar ko'zga tashlanadi. Ba'zi kitobxonlar "yangi Kichkina shahzoda" deb ta'riflayotgan "Bolakay, ko'rsichqon, tulki va tulpor" bizga qanday "yangilik" bera oladi? …

❤20custom 532105501044692694818👍8🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC933 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"1984"ni ko‘pchilik "Katta Og‘a seni kuzatyapti" degan ogohlantirish deb o‘qiydi. Lekin menimcha, Oruellning asl xabari nazorat haqida emas. Asl xabar bundan dahshatliroq: inson qanchalik sodiq bo‘lmasin, uni sindirish uchun sabab baribir topiladi. Har kimning o‘z sinish nuqtasi, o‘z "101-xonasi" bor. Uinston oxirgi qiynoqqacha chidaydi, sevgilisi Juliani sotmaydi. Lekin qiynoqchilar uning eng chuqur qo‘rquvi, kala…

custom 532105501044692694834🔥9❤6👍2

3 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,160 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum, kitobxo‘r do‘stlarim! Mening ismim Aqrab. Ismim sizni aslo cho‘chitmasin — men odatiy zaharli chayon emas, balki kitob chayoniman (ilmiy tilda: Chelifer cancroides, inglizcha: book scorpion yoki pseudoscorpion, ruscha: книжный ложноскорпион). Ajdodlarim asrlar davomida eski kutubxonalarning sirli javonlarida, sarg‘aygan sahifalar orasida yashab kelgan. Oilamizning eng katta vazifasi — kitoblarni y…

❤21🔥13custom 53210550104469269489

29 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,650 views51 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Quyidagi kitoblarni sotgan “Qamar” sotuvchisiga 20 milliondan oshiq jarima qo‘llanilibdi: “ISHQ”, “Qalb iffati”, “Har ayol Hojardir”, “Ruh ziynatlari”, “Huzur eshigi”, “Ad-durusun nahviya/1-2”. Sababi: bu kitoblarda diniy mazmun aniqlangan va Din ishlari bo‘yicha qo‘mitaning rozilini olmasdan sotilmoqda. "Farengeyt bo'yicha 451º" yoki "1984" esimga kelyapti... 🔖 @kitobxoncha

🤔26😐15👍6🔥3❤1

26 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,870 views38 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

➖ Shunday yillarni ko‘rdikki, baxtli bo‘lish uyat edi. ➖ Kitob – boylik. Lekin sotib olgani emas, o‘qilgani. ➖ Yozuvchi yolg‘onni to‘qiydi-yu, haqiqatni yozadi. ➖ O‘zimizda bo‘lgan tuyg‘ularni yashirish qiyinmi yoki o‘zimizda bo‘lmagan tuyg‘ularni ifodalashmi? Shukur Burxon mening bu savolimga shunday deb javob bergan edi: ikkalasiga ham artistizm kerak. ➖ Yolg‘on o‘zi uncha xavfli emas, uning haqiqatga o‘xshab k…

custom 532105501044692694821❤8🔥8👍1

24 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,850 views50 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

"Rumiy va Rabg‘uziy O‘zbekistonda ruxsatsiz tarqatish mumkin bo‘lmagan adabiyotlarmi? Navoiy-chi?" Kechqurun sizlarga yuzdan ortiq kitoblar ro‘yxatini tashlab, ularni nima birlashtirib turgani haqida so‘ragan edim. Javoblar turlicha bo‘ldi, ammo asl haqiqat ancha achchiq va mantiqsiz. Bu ro‘yxatdagi kitoblarni birlashtirib turuvchi yagona jihat — ularning barchasi tekshiruvchilar tomonidan "diniy mazmundagi materia…

❤20custom 532105501044692694813🔥10👍7

23 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,170 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Bu faylda 100 dan ortiq kitoblarning muqova surati berilgan. Bu kitoblarning barchasini birlashtirib turuvchi bir nuqta bor. Xo‘sh, qaysi jihati bu kitoblarni birlashtirib turadi? Bu kitoblarning kamida 1-2 tasi kitob javoningizda topilsa kerak. Aynan qaysilari bor va nechanchi yilgi nashr? Javobingizni yozing. Shu haqida biroz jiddiyroq post yozaman. Ungacha xayrli tun! 🔖 @kitobxoncha

custom 532105501044692694813👍7🤔5❤4🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,280 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Shoira Tillaniso aktual gaplarni yozmoqda. Sizni fikringiz qanday? O‘zbekistonda har qanday zamonaviylik eskining ustiga bosim bo‘lib qo‘shilyapti. Eskini olib tashlamayapti, aksincha ikkalasi birga yashayman deb kengayib, shishib, aholi ustiga og‘ir tosh kabi bosim yaratmoqda. 2000-yillarda ota-ona qayg‘usi bolalarini yeb-ichirib, o‘qimishli qilib, uylab qo‘yish bo‘lgan bo‘lsa, endi ularning ustiga bir qancha "zam…

❤18🔥9👍5

19 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,560 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Savob" deb qilinayotgan o‘g‘rilik yoxud nima uchun PDF kitob tarqatish jinoyat? Telegram guruhlarda yoki izohlarda eng ko‘p uchraydigan holatlardan biri: "Yangi chiqqan falon kitobning PDF varianti yo‘qmi?", "Palon asarni pdfi bormi?", "Qayerdan topsa bo‘ladi?", "Audiokitoblarni qayerdan bepul olsa bo‘ladi" kabi gaplar. Keling, masalaga hissiyotlar bilan emas, din, qonun va mantiq tarozisida yondashamiz. "Ilm tarq…

❤12custom 53210550104469269489🔥8👍4

19 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC≈2,610 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Yigit bo‘lajak kelinga oila mavzusidagi kitobni hadya qilibdi va qiz uni o‘qib, yigitga turmushga chiqmaslikka qaror qilibdi:) Manba: Hubbuna Jiddiy olmasdan, chunchaki tabassum qilinadigan post) 🔖 @kitobxoncha

😁36🤣25custom 588648471048120578915❤6

17 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC≈2,350 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kitob o‘qiganda diqqatni jamlashga qiynalayotganlar bormi? Xurshid aka Maroziqov ilmiy tadqiqotlar va onlayn kitobxonlik guruhlaridagi amaliy tajribalarni bitta joyga jamlabdilar. Qiziq va amaliy tomondan samarali ekan. Foydasi tegsa, duo qilib qo‘yarsizlar :) Link: khursh.id/kitob 🔖 @kitobxoncha

custom 588648471048120578920❤2🔥2

16 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,350 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kitoblar sizni baxtsiz qiladi! Ha, to‘g‘ri o‘qidingiz. Shu mazmundagi jumlani "Akademnashr" rahbari Sanjar akaning bir intervyusida eshitib qolgan edim. Aslida, o‘zimda va atrofdagilarda shunga o‘xshash holatni ko‘p kuzatganman, lekin bu hisni so‘z bilan qanday ifodalashni bilmay yurgandim. Shunday asarlar bor — ularni o‘qigach, ichingizda qandaydir og‘riq paydo bo‘ladi. Avval ko‘rmagan va sezmaganingiz muammolar, …

custom 588648471048120578922❤2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kitobxoncha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kitobchi” (@kitobxoncha), 1,623 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitobxoncha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.