Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A’zamxo‘jayev / Аъзамхўжаев

Channel

A’zamxo‘jayev / Аъзамхўжаев

@muhrim2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,940subscribers

+98 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562341176
TypeChannel
Username@muhrim2022
DescriptionBu — @muhrim’ga sig‘magan kontent uchun mo‘ljallangan yordamchi kanal. Kanaldagi aksariyat postlar yumor va hazil huquqi asosida yozilgan. 📢Murojaatlar uchun — @muhrim2022_chatbot 💰Tijoriy hamkorlik — @muhrim2022_adsbot
Created5 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/muhrim2022

Growth

17,84217,94017,8915 August 2026 — 17,842 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,842 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,923 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,927 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,918 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,916 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,919 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,935 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,938 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,940 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,827–17,955 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:4317,940+2
16 Aug 2026, 03:1417,938+3
14 Aug 2026, 12:1917,935-4
13 Aug 2026, 00:2417,939+20
11 Aug 2026, 21:3217,919+3
10 Aug 2026, 21:4217,916-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:5317,918-9
8 Aug 2026, 23:5117,927+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:2317,923+17
7 Aug 2026, 03:4617,906+48
6 Aug 2026, 07:2117,858+16
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,842no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0217,842first reading

Engagement

142 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 17,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,010
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 142 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held142 (4 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total853,020
Reactions total23,749
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,240
Videos
1,800
Links
5,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 13s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,918 reactions across 122 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7,32638.7%
👍3,61219.1%
1,3757.27%
😢1,1916.30%
🤬1,0265.42%
🔥9054.78%
💯8284.38%
👎8084.27%
🥴4162.20%
😨2521.33%
🤔2131.13%
👏1981.05%
🤯1650.872%
😱1360.719%
🗿1350.714%
💔690.365%
😐600.317%
🙉510.27%
🎉420.222%
🥰370.196%
6 further kinds730.386%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,749reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 142 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muhrim2022. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 142 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈3,440 views139 reactions2 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

“Birodarim Husanovni sevaman!”, — Donnaruma :) (#) PS. Erinmaganlar biror chiroyli edit qilsin, Husanov Donnarumaning boshiga urishlarini qo‘shib :)

😁113👍24👎1😨1

17 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈4,560 views108 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Yaxshi xabar (#)

👍97🤔6👏4🤷‍♂1

17 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈4,960 views95 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Qashqadaryoning Beshkent shahrida 127 mln dollarlik shifoxona qurilarkan. Hududlarda mana shunaqa ko‘p tarmoqli yirik shifoxonalarni ko‘paytirish kerak (#)

👍829🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈4,410 views65 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

O‘ngda — “Urganch aeroporti — Xiva vokzali” yo‘nalishi uchun Xitoydan olingan poyezd (#)

👍52😁10🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈6,080 views157 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

G‘alati-a: O‘zbekistonda o‘tgan yilgidan ko‘proq Cobalt chiqarilgan, lekin o‘tgan yilgidan 39 foizga kamroq sotilgan. Bejizga Cobalt uchun ham bir balo aksiyalar chiqib qolmadi :) (#)

😁144👍63👏3🤔1

16 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈5,890 views124 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Urush g‘aroyib bir bosqichga kirdi (#)

😁108👎10👍4🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈5,770 views125 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Mana shu jarayonlar haqida nuqul qirg‘iz mediasi orqali bilyapmiz-a? O‘zimizning rasmiylar hech narsa demayapti, a? (#)

🥴91😁16👍5😨4💯32🤔2🤬1

16 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈5,930 views34 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Toshkent yopgan noni qanday qilib Korzinka tandirxonalarini egallagani haqida: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMVy4a_HXWo&t=8955s

🔥25👍8🤔1

16 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈5,980 views146 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Oliy suddan raddiya. Manba Kontekst

👎94😁34🤬13🗿31🤔1

16 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈5,730 views88 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Botir aka aytganidek, buni kabinetda o‘tirganlar emas, bozor hal qilishi kerak. Vazir aytayotgan “sifatsiz ta’lim beradigan universitetlar” qo‘shni davlatlarda ham ko‘pdir, bizdagi ortiqcha ehtiyojni ular qondiraveradi va yoshlarimiz u yerdan o‘zimizga “perevod” qilaveradi, menimcha (#)

👍57💯264🤬1

16 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈5,390 views123 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Iya, tavba… (#)

😁98👍17👎5🤔2😨1

16 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈5,660 views203 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Toshkentdagi “Moviy gumbazlar” restorani yaqinidagi oq tutning yoshi 350 da ekan. Qoyile! Davlat himoyasiga olinibdi shu daraxt (#)

🔥145👍38🥰8😍43😁3🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @muhrim2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@muhrim2022 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Poll2,510 voters approx.

Farzandingiz qanday maktabga qatnaydi?

  1. Davlat maktabiga46%
  2. Xususiy maktabga11%
  3. Menda hali bunday tashvish yo‘q41%
  4. Farzandlarim maktabni bitirgan2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll1,780 voters approx.

Sizga eng ko‘p qaysi biri yoqdi?

  1. Gurjilar ijrosi34%
  2. O‘zbeklar ijrosi57%
  3. Qrim-tatarlar ijrosi9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,231 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Prezident matbuot kotibi | Sherzod Asadov
@Press_Secretary_Uz · 149,815
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
Xushnudbek - o‘ta shaxsiy
@xushnudbekuz · 97,387
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Tribuna.uz
@tribunauznews · 175,443
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
Даврон Файзиев
@Davron_Fayziev · 393,819
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
Xayrulla Hamidov official
@xayrulla_hamidov · 383,567
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
Muslim.uz
@muslimuzportal · 107,543
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
FATVO.UZ | Расмий канал
@diniysavollar · 200,668
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
Championat.asia
@championatasia · 97,417
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
DARAKCHI.UZ | Rasmiy kanal
@darakchi · 124,959
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
SSV matbuot kotibi
@ssvmatbuotkotibi · 121,470
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Qalampir.uz I расмий канал
@qalampir · 251,461
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
Rasmiy xabarlar I Официальные новости
@Rasmiy_xabarlar_Official · 88,481
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
Daryo | Rasmiy kanal
@daryo · 421,964
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
Sirdaryo Xabarlari
@Sirdaryo · 122,506
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
Shavkat Mirziyoyev_press-service
@shmirziyoyev · 239,267
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
Xushnudbek.uz
@xushnudbek · 664,234
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
Qashqadaryo xalqi 🇺🇿
@Qashqadaryo_shahrisabz_xalqi · 296,097
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
Shou-biznes yangiliklari
@shoubizyangiliklari · 122,459
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Bankxabar
@bankxabar · 100,227
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
Alisher Sadullaev
@alisher_sadullaev · 260,702
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
QASHQADARYO AHLI
@Qashqadaryo · 308,846
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Setanta Sports O'zbekiston 🇺🇿
@setanta_uzb · 137,353
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
🎥UZvideo | Расмий
@vodiy_times · 118,386
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
"Hududiy elektr tarmoqlari" AJ bilan muloqot
@hetmuloqot · 95,317
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A’zamxo‘jayev / Аъзамхўжаев” (@muhrim2022), 17,940 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhrim2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.