Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kitoblar ombori

Channel

Kitoblar ombori

@kitob_ombori

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,708subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297286887
TypeChannel
Username@kitob_ombori
DescriptionBog'lanish uchun: @tezkorxatlarbot
Created11 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitob_ombori

Growth

14,70814,76514,736.56 August 2026 — 14,765 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,765 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,758 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,757 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,748 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,719 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,737 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,710 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,708 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,699–14,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:0414,708-2
13 Aug 2026, 14:1714,710-27
12 Aug 2026, 12:0814,737+18
11 Aug 2026, 13:4614,719-16
10 Aug 2026, 10:3714,735-13
9 Aug 2026, 07:5114,748-9
8 Aug 2026, 09:5714,757-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:1014,758-7
6 Aug 2026, 18:0014,765no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:5014,765first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 14,708 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held45 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total135,028
Reactions total8,911
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,210
Videos
1,050
Links
2,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,911 reactions across 44 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,44927.5%
😁2,14824.1%
🔥1,31614.8%
💯97210.9%
❤‍🔥95210.7%
👍3243.64%
💔2642.96%
🐳2392.68%
😢1511.69%
🥰480.539%
👏310.348%
👎170.191%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,911reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 44 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kitob_ombori. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC208 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Qaytib seni oʻylamayman Oʻylamayman... Yuragim tub-tubiga koʻmdim ismingni Kipriklarim tilimlab, yirtdi raqamingni Dilsizlarga boʻlishib bergin sevgingni Ortiq dilning nolasini tinglamayman Qaytib seni oʻylamayman Oʻylamayman... @kitob_ombori

💔145💯3❤‍🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTCviews —

Kitoblar ombori pinned «Soʻnggi bir yil ichida kanal saviyasi ancha tushdi. Mavzular shaxsiylashdi, kitob mavzusi 2-darajaga tushib qoldi. Buni har doim anglaganman. Lekin kanalni uzoq yillar bilan kuzatayotganlar bor. Ora-sirada tanish ismlarni izohlarda yozganini koʻrib xursand…»

15 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,630 views75 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Odatda oʻzbekning bolasi falsafa bilan universitetga kirgandagina tanishadi. Bu degani 16-17 yoshgacha falsafa haqida eshitgan ammo u nimani oʻrganadi, u oʻzi nimaga kerak degan savollarni oʻziga bermagan boʻladi. Falsafa oʻzi qiyin ilm, uni anglash uchun inson ma’lum bilan fanlardan fundamental bilimlarga, hayotiy tajribalarga ega boʻlishi kerak deydiganlar ham bor. Lekin aslida inson bolasi tili chiqishi bilan fa

🔥3321❤‍🔥12💯7👍2

15 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,910 views144 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Unpackingni koʻrib rohatlaning va hasad qilinglar. POV: edit’lanmagan video

😁81🔥26🐳225😢4❤‍🔥3🥰3

15 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC≈1,980 views68 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Bugun Akrom Malik bilan “Qamar” kitoblar doʻkonida suhbat boʻlarkan. “Halqa” va “Jangchi” asarlari haqida savollarim bor edi. Nasib qilsa borib bir suhbatlarini olamiz. Vaqtingiz boʻlsa ilm majlisiga boringlar. Imkoniyati yoʻqlar uchun oʻzimiz borsak xulosamizni boʻlishamiz inshalloh.

45❤‍🔥10🔥5🥰5🐳3

15 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈2,060 views201 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hozir oʻqishni bitirdim. Diplomim boʻyicha 1 kun ham ishlamaganman. Maktabga boshlanishiga 4 mln oylikka ishga takliflar boʻlgan. Oʻsha paytda erkin grafikli ishda bu summadan koʻproq pul topar edim. Toshkentga keldim. Katta-katta nufuzli universitet, xususiy maktablarda, kompaniyalarda ishladim. Hozir ham ishlab kelmoqdaman. Ammo shu paytgacha hech bir ishxonam diplomimni, unda olgan ballarimga qiziqmadi. Hammasi “

😁12727💔21🔥7💯5😢5🐳3👍3

15 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈2,130 views174 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Birinchi fail’ni eslayman. Andijondagi mashinasozlik insitutiga topshirgandim. U paytlarda mandatni oʻsha topshirgan univer/insitutga borib koʻrish kerak edi. Oʻqishga kirgan kirmaganlarning ismlari yozilgan qogʻozni insitut devoriga yopishtirib qoʻyishardi. Matematika/fizikani rosa oʻqigandim. Ustozlarim ham oʻzim ham oʻqishga kirishimga ishonardik. Hayajonsiz, ishonch bilan borgandim. Oʻz ismimni grantga kirganlar

97👍26🔥14🐳12👏8😢8❤‍🔥3💔2

15 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC≈2,510 views414 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Mandat chiqibdi. Doimgidek inyazni ballari uchib yotibdikan. 184 ball bilan oʻqishga kirolmasdan buralib yigʻlayotgan jiyanimga nima deb tasalli berishni bilmay turibman. Xafa boʻlma jiyan. Ano Germaniyada kirgan universitetingda oʻqib qoʻyorasanda endi

😁326💔42🔥14❤‍🔥11😢106👍3🐳1

14 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈2,770 views155 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Biz nima uchun kitob oʻqiymiz? Faqat ma’lumot olish uchunmi yoki boshqalardan koʻra aqlliroq boʻlish uchunmi? Hammaning sababi turli xil. Jumladan meniki ham. Men kitobni avvalo oʻzligimni anglash uchun oʻqiyman. Miyamdagi, hayolim va hayotimdagi voqealikni tushunish, anglash uchun oʻqiyman. Yashashni, toʻgʻri yashashni oʻrganish uchun oʻqiyman. Kitob oʻqib tugatgan inson beixtiyor uning mazmun mohiyatini shaxsiy ha

70💯46❤‍🔥23🔥9🐳5👍2

14 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,570 views109 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Soʻnggi bir yil ichida kanal saviyasi ancha tushdi. Mavzular shaxsiylashdi, kitob mavzusi 2-darajaga tushib qoldi. Buni har doim anglaganman. Lekin kanalni uzoq yillar bilan kuzatayotganlar bor. Ora-sirada tanish ismlarni izohlarda yozganini koʻrib xursand boʻlaman. Savolim shundaki, nima uchun hali ham kanalni kuzatyapsiz? U sizga avvalgidek manfaat bermayotgan boʻlsa ham. Premium yoʻqligi sabab kanalni izohini oc

61🔥21❤‍🔥18👍6🐳3

14 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,870 views363 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Siz ham hech qachon o'qimaydigan kitoblaringiz uchun millionlar sarflab, ularni javonga terib qo'yasizmi? Tabriklayman, sizda o'ljalarini yig'ib, ularga termulib o'tirib rohatlanadigan manyaklarning xarakteri bor ekan

😁270💯4133❤‍🔥6🐳4👍4🔥3💔2

14 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈4,070 views317 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Uyimdagi "o'qilishi kerak bo'lgan kitoblar" uyumi bir kun kelib ustimga qulab, meni bosib qoladi. Lekin tan olish kerak, bu eng sharafli o'lim bo'ladi

😁218💯4523👍10🔥6❤‍🔥5💔4🐳3

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @kitob_ombori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,858 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kitoblar ombori” (@kitob_ombori), 14,708 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitob_ombori.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.