Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 老挝新闻头条

Channel

老挝新闻头条

@hyxw8

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36,556subscribers

+11,685 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001599092007
TypeChannel
Username@hyxw8
Description✅老挝新闻头条,疑难杂症来问我 ✅本频道只负责相关发布信息,真假自行甄别! ✅为全球华人分享老挝文化,一起看最美的老挝! 免费投稿: @feihang
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hyxw8

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@hyxw8/84900 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC@hyxw7/6164010 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@hyxw8/87634 · this entry4 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC@hyxw7/643874 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@hyxw8/87901 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC@hyxw7/646566 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@hyxw8/88011 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC@hyxw7/647677 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@hyxw8/89374 · this entry19 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC@hyxw7/6614219 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@hyxw8/90305 · this entry28 Sept 2026, 04:08 UTC@hyxw7/6708128 Sept 2026, 04:08 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hyxw7648 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (643–5)
@hyxw5614 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (610–4)
@hyxw9374 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (369–5)
@hyxw3293 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@hyxw3 (196–97)
@hyxw4284 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (282–2)
@hyxw2258 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (256–2)
@hyxw6243 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (238–5)
@dnysj199 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@dnysj (189–10)
@th7697 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@th769 (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 414 of the 414 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,212 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @hyxw3. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

24,85356,04540,4498 August 2026 — 24,871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,871 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,865 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,862 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,858 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,853 subscribers15 August 2026 — 54,840 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,831 subscribers18 August 2026 — 54,818 subscribers19 August 2026 — 55,611 subscribers21 August 2026 — 55,606 subscribers22 August 2026 — 55,600 subscribers24 August 2026 — 55,586 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,574 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,561 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,560 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,555 subscribers29 August 2026 — 55,547 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55,545 subscribers31 August 2026 — 55,539 subscribers1 September 2026 — 55,527 subscribers2 September 2026 — 55,515 subscribers4 September 2026 — 55,508 subscribers6 September 2026 — 55,764 subscribers10 September 2026 — 55,737 subscribers12 September 2026 — 55,709 subscribers14 September 2026 — 55,687 subscribers17 September 2026 — 55,669 subscribers29 September 2026 — 56,045 subscribers5 October 2026 — 51,864 subscribers9 October 2026 — 47,361 subscribers13 October 2026 — 44,701 subscribers14 October 2026 — 44,160 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,134 subscribers16 October 2026 — 41,430 subscribers17 October 2026 — 40,931 subscribers18 October 2026 — 40,909 subscribers19 October 2026 — 39,239 subscribers20 October 2026 — 38,704 subscribers21 October 2026 — 38,548 subscribers22 October 2026 — 38,453 subscribers24 October 2026 — 38,256 subscribers25 October 2026 — 38,157 subscribers26 October 2026 — 38,024 subscribers27 October 2026 — 37,925 subscribers28 October 2026 — 37,893 subscribers29 October 2026 — 37,791 subscribers30 October 2026 — 37,658 subscribers31 October 2026 — 37,574 subscribers1 November 2026 — 37,339 subscribers1 November 2026 — 37,279 subscribers3 November 2026 — 37,127 subscribers4 November 2026 — 36,997 subscribers5 November 2026 — 36,824 subscribers6 November 2026 — 36,625 subscribers7 November 2026 — 37,511 subscribers8 November 2026 — 37,299 subscribers9 November 2026 — 36,011 subscribers11 November 2026 — 35,921 subscribers14 November 2026 — 36,556 subscribers36,5568 August 202614 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net +11,685. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,174–60,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 12:5936,556+635
11 Nov 2026, 10:4735,921-90
9 Nov 2026, 16:0636,011-1,288
8 Nov 2026, 10:4137,299-212
7 Nov 2026, 05:2737,511+886
6 Nov 2026, 06:3436,625-199
5 Nov 2026, 08:3536,824-173
4 Nov 2026, 05:5536,997-130
3 Nov 2026, 02:5637,127-152
1 Nov 2026, 23:3637,279-60
1 Nov 2026, 02:3737,339-235
31 Oct 2026, 00:4037,574-84
30 Oct 2026, 01:5037,658-133
29 Oct 2026, 00:0837,791-102
28 Oct 2026, 01:1037,893-32
27 Oct 2026, 02:1937,925-99
26 Oct 2026, 05:2538,024-133
25 Oct 2026, 02:4538,157-99
24 Oct 2026, 01:4038,256-197
22 Oct 2026, 22:0538,453first reading

Engagement

2,553 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.86%
avg views ÷ 36,556 subscribers
Avg views / post
682
804 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
804
of 2,553 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held2,553 (8 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total548,002
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈60,000
Videos
≈11,500
Links
≈31,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 42m
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 288 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 804 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 13:29 UTC938 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:缅甸妙瓦底帕胺山上,号称“Dalei山B区”,都是黑公司,每天都在虐待中国人,简直是人间地狱般的打人。 很多中国人被困在山上,这些人都是被骗、绑架来的,他们没有机会回家。他们每天都遭受酷刑,被电击、被铁棍殴打,骨头都被打断。许多人已经死去,都被埋葬在这里。有时,他们还会被鬼魂缠身。 他们的父母都盼望着他们回家,但有些人却被禁止回家。每天的酷刑都在加剧,有些人已经无法活下去。公司的残暴酷刑和殴打,比牲畜还不如。物业是知情的,知道那些公司虐待、打人的事,他们也不在乎,只为了自己的利益,不管不顾。 希望缅甸政府、国际援助部队能看见这则新闻后,解救这些人。否则,他们都会死在这里,被埋葬在山上。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#越南资讯:海防市捣毁外国人网络诈骗窝点,5名中国籍人员被处罚并驱逐出境 据越南当地媒体11月14日报道,案件最早于10月28日在海防市吉碑国际机场(Cat Bi International Airport)被发现。当时,一名中国籍男子携带35部手机及21张空白SIM卡,引起执法人员怀疑。 随后,海防市公安出入境管理部门展开调查,发现该男子与另外4名中国籍人员共同居住在当地黎真郡(Le Chan)一处住宿场所。 执法人员进一步搜查后,在相关地点查获多部手机、笔记本电脑、台式电脑以及大量SIM卡。 警方检查电子设备时,发现其中存有多种针对外国受害者实施诈骗的话术,包括冒充专家、律师,以及以投资项目和协助追回被骗资金为名,诱骗受害者转账。 经过调查,5名中国籍人员因相关违法行为受到行政处罚,随后被安排驱逐出境。 越南警方表示,将继续加强对外国人在当地活动的管理,严厉打击利用网络实施诈骗及其他违法犯罪活动。 🔔华人头条:…

15 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:有时候你想约个炮,却不小心谈了场恋爱;有时候想好好谈个恋爱,却发现不过是一场交易。 今天和一个女网友面基,煞费苦心地吹得天花乱坠,只为了讨好、想拿下她。谁知对方早已看穿了自己的心思,直接明码标价,非常果断。 不得不承认一件事,我们当中很多男同胞,还没有这个越南女生活得那么通透。有时候,花钱就能解决的事,我们非要舔人家,请人吃饭,陪人逛街,买衣服,还送早晚的祝福,嘘寒问暖的。等到最后,女神酒足饭饱想回家,让自己彻底破防了才满意。这不是浪费精力嘛? 在东南亚,社交的目的无非也只有三个而已:交流、交易、交配。除此之外,皆是无效社交。讲究价值交换,这更是成年人应有的品质。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

香港警方捣毁跨境电话诈骗中转中心,8人被捕,涉案金额约400万港元 据香港媒体11月13日报道,警方调查发现,该犯罪集团租用工业大厦单位作为电话诈骗中转据点,利用网络电话(VoIP)设备及电话交换系统,为境外诈骗人员提供技术支持,使诈骗电话能够显示香港本地电话号码,以此降低受害者的戒心。 调查显示,该集团主要冒充电子支付平台客服人员,谎称受害者已经开通月费订阅服务,随后以取消订阅为由,要求受害者缴纳所谓的保证金。 不少受害者按照对方指示,将款项转入指定傀儡银行账户,转账完成后,诈骗人员随即失去联系。 警方指出,该集团过去一段时间至少涉及33名受害者,累计损失约400万港元,其中一名受害者损失超过30万港元。 在此次执法行动中,警方成功拆除相关网络电话设备,并拘捕8名涉案人员。其中,一名46岁男子已被正式起诉,其余7人仍在接受调查。 警方调查发现,该犯罪集团内部存在明确分工,涉及租赁场所、申请电话线路、搭建技术设备及日常…

15 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

缅甸若开邦难民营遭军方空袭,至少12人死亡、18人受伤,包括一名5岁儿童 据法新社(AFP)11月15日报道,当地目击者及救援人员证实,空袭发生于11月13日,地点位于缅甸西部若开邦蓬那均镇(Ponnagyun)一处名为Byar La的境内流离失所者营地,距离实兑市东北方向不远。 当地救援组织Phyusin Yin Khwin负责人Khine Hein Htet表示,此次袭击已造成12人死亡、18人受伤,死者中包括一名年仅5岁的儿童。 一名27岁的当地女商贩Chit Su Wai悲痛表示,她的女儿、母亲及姨母均在此次空袭中遇难。她的遭遇也反映出当地平民在持续战火中的艰难处境。 据了解,该难民营主要收容因战乱而流离失所的居民,部分人员已经在营地生活长达4年。此次空袭造成多人死伤,也使当地原本脆弱的生活环境进一步恶化。 自2021年缅甸军方发动政变以来,该国持续陷入武装冲突。若开邦是战事较为严重的地区之一,目前该邦大部分地…

15 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:柬埔寨移民局3号安置点3号安置点,都有人饿的吃打火机了,大使馆人说15号会来人通知。到现在都没人,难道这么些天不管了吗?在这一点消息没有。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

上厕所前请先观察一下,小心有蛇!🐍 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:缅甸水沟谷一号村长已经通知 :住在公寓的中国人,一人每个月需要交 一万泰铢 过几天会检查,如果疑问 询问下房东确认。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 15 November 2026
Voice message

妹妹,别用你说过无数次爱别人的那张嘴来跟我谈感情。哥现在没那么多浪漫情怀,也不想听那些甜言蜜语。说白了,在东南亚混了这么多年,我早就明白一个道理:嘴上的爱不值钱,银行卡里的余额才最实在。 在这个圈子里待久了,见过太多形形色色的人。今天跟这个称兄道弟,明天跟那个谈情说爱,嘴上说着一辈子,转身就能各奔东西。感情这东西,有时候比业绩还难看懂。 你以为遇到了真心,最后才发现,大家不过是各取所需。 哥不是不相信爱情,只是现在真的没心思研究这些。每天睁开眼睛,想着的是业绩、工资、生活费,还有国内等着自己寄钱的家人。行情好的时候,想着多攒一点;行情不好的时候,连自己下个月在哪里都不知道。成年人最大的安全感,不是谁说爱你,而是自己手里有钱,遇到事情不用低头。 所以,妹妹,别动不动就跟哥谈爱不爱,也别拿几句甜言蜜语来试探我的真心。哥现在只想安安静静搞钱,把自己的日子过好。感情可以慢慢谈,钱却不能不赚。不是哥变现实了,而是这些年经历得太多,终…

15 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC995 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

又到了 吃龙虾的季节 🦞 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang

15 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC933 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

香港警方捣毁跨境洗钱集团,22人被捕!涉案金额逾1.5亿港元,查获1600多张银行卡 香港警方近日展开打击洗黑钱行动,成功捣毁一个涉嫌利用银行账户处理诈骗犯罪所得的跨境洗钱集团,共拘捕22名男女,包括19名中国内地男子、1名中国内地女子及2名香港本地男子,涉嫌洗钱金额超过1.5亿港元。 警方调查发现,该犯罪集团涉嫌于2026年8月至10月期间,从中国内地招募人员来港,安排他们开设网上银行账户,利用大量银行账户接收诈骗所得资金。 随后,集团成员被安排到不同银行的自动柜员机提取现金,再将资金运送至一间伪装成虚拟货币场外交易所的店铺,通过虚拟货币交易等方式转移及处理犯罪所得,以掩饰资金来源。 警方根据调查线索,突击搜查多间宾馆、分间单位及涉案店铺,行动中拘捕22名嫌疑人,并检获大量涉案证物,包括: 超过1,600张银行卡; 约585万港元现金; 超过200部手机; 大量银行账户资料及相关文件。 警方初步调查显示,该犯罪集团涉…

15 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC903 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:缅甸109园区:高薪招聘背后涉嫌非法拘禁、暴力殴打及人口贩卖 缅甸交克一处被称为“109”的园区,涉嫌存在严重违法犯罪问题。该园区由DKBA相关势力管理,距离DKBA总部不到40分钟、6号地。前段时间,还有一个名为“恒生”的资金盘转移至该园区。园区内部涉及以越南为目标的网络诈骗、非法招聘及人员控制等问题。 湖北籍、代号“小七”的人员与四川籍、代号“火柴”的人员,涉嫌共同组建针对越南市场的诈骗团队,通过虚假招聘、诱骗入职等方式招募人员,利用所谓的高薪工作机会吸引求职者进入园区,实际却涉嫌从事网络诈骗及杀猪盘活动。 该团队内部管理手段极其恶劣,员工遭受打骂、威胁,部分泰国、越南、缅甸籍员工长期无法领取工资。2天才给诈骗出客户的员工吃一次方便面,甚至有人因拒绝继续参与诈骗活动而遭到暴力对待。 有关人员伤亡的指控同样令人担忧。据爆料,代号“火柴”的人员涉嫌打死两名越南籍员工、一名泰国籍员工,另有一名缅甸华人遭到严重伤…

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,553 posts we hold for @hyxw8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“老挝新闻头条” (@hyxw8), 36,556 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyxw8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.