Channel
@baoguang7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,121subscribers
-17,220 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002109298652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguang7 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguang7 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 43,121 | -449 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 43,570 | -282 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 43,852 | -435 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 44,287 | -111 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 44,398 | -106 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 44,504 | -127 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 44,631 | -548 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 45,179 | -155 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 45,334 | -147 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 45,481 | -450 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 45,931 | -424 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 46,355 | -793 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 47,148 | -874 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 48,022 | -4,616 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 52,638 | -1,584 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 54,222 | -1,375 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 55,597 | -1,417 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 57,014 | +15,689 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 41,325 | -219 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 41,544 | first reading |
1,073 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,073 (18 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 54,894 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 268 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
缅甸偷渡的注意了！！！近期严打 #网友投稿：昨天晚上从南伞路线偷渡去缅甸的，准备去接人的时候被巡逻警察看到了，盘问的时候有嫌疑，当场把他们都带走了，一共3个人 警方为了找出来幕后蛇头，今天早上开始对部分地区挨家挨户搜查（南伞康达-南伞次树丫口），严查偷渡跟外地籍人员，今天晚上24小时严守边境线 近期要跑路的群友们，换条线路哈，不然等下撞枪口上面了😅 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
#群友投稿：马来西亚吉隆坡郊区别墅今天下午检查，本地人举报中国人搞诈骗，移民局把一栋别墅围了。别墅的打野公司太高调了也不安全，大家小心！！！ ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
🇸🇬 新加坡警方两周全岛行动调查277名骗子与钱骡，涉883起诈骗案、损失约610万新元 新加坡警察部队网络司令部联合七个警署于10月8日至21日展开为期两周的全岛行动，277名涉嫌诈骗或充当钱骡者（15至76岁）正协助调查，初步查明涉及电商、钓鱼、求职、冒充政府官员、投资及幸运抽奖等883起诈骗案，受害者损失约610万新元。 涉案者面临欺诈、洗钱及无照提供支付服务等罪名指控；新法下诈骗集团成员及招募者将面临至少6下、最多24下强制鞭刑。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
#马来西亚资讯：总理下令公务员禁用Waze 10月21日消息，马来西亚总理安瓦尔·易卜拉欣决定，禁止全体公务员使用导航软件Waze。 总理办公室发布声明称，此举旨在保护政府涉密信息与个人资料，防范数据遭以色列方面滥用。声明表示，Waze Mobile Ltd作为用户数据管控方，依以色列法律注册运营。 官方强调，政府敏感信息与民众个人数据必须妥善保护，避免被以色列政权利用，损害国家安全与国家主权。安瓦尔同时建议民众停用Waze，改用TuJu等本土导航应用，依托本土产品保障数据安全。总理办公室指出， 马政府立场坚定，将封堵任何可被以色列方面用来威胁国家与民众安全的渠道。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
#网友投稿：广西南宁埌西最近扫黄，很多站街女被抓了！ 公主请上车，在东南亚也扫，想着回国享受下，结果快乐都没了😭😭😭 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️全球直登 ⚡️BBIN 联合迪威娱乐城 联手打造优质娱乐平台！ 新会员首存赠送100%彩金（仅限ABA和加密货币） ⚡️支持 微信 支付宝 银行卡 充值 ⚡️支持 USDT ABA 充值 ⚡️支持 波币 NO钱包 购宝 多种钱包 充值 ⚡️24小时存取不打烊 ⚡️充值提现实时到账 🧂⚽️🏀🏈⚾️🥎🎾🏐 ⚡️官方频道: @diwei4 ⚡️官方客服: @diwei2 ⚡️官方代理：@diwei3 ⚡️官方网址: diwei.app ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
非洲大规模电诈清剿 1462人落网、追回超1亿美元，乌干达曾一次抓获365名中国人 10月22日，国际刑警组织公布“塞伦盖蒂行动第三阶段”打击成果：来自21个国家的执法机构联合行动，共抓获1462名网络犯罪嫌疑人，打击10909个恶意网络，追回超过1.05亿美元非法资金，涉及的诈骗及其他网络犯罪造成超过3.85亿美元经济损失。 更值得关注的是，乌干达成为此次行动的重点地区之一。国际刑警组织披露，当地警方捣毁两个跨国诈骗团伙，抓获365名外国籍嫌疑人。这些团伙虽然将窝点设在非洲，却主要针对亚洲受害者，通过虚假投资平台和退休金投资骗局骗取钱财。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
#巴基斯坦资讯：伊斯兰堡网络投资诈骗案宣判，3人喊各获刑7年，涉案金额近1940万卢比 巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡近日发生的一起网络投资诈骗案迎来判决。巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA）伊斯兰堡分局调查的一宗案件中，3名被告因通过冒充外国私人银行的虚假手机应用程序实施投资诈骗，被法院分别判处7年监禁，并合计罚款25万巴基斯坦卢比。 调查显示，涉案人员利用伪装成外国私人银行的虚假手机应用程序，向受害者兜售投资项目，以投资获利为诱饵，诱使其投入资金，最终造成重大经济损失。 案件由NCCIA伊斯兰堡分局副督察 Shehroz Riaz 负责调查。调查人员通过开展案件调查、收集相关证据并向法院提交材料，为案件定罪提供了支持。法院在完成相关司法程序后，对3名被告作出上述判决。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.m…
西港金贝赌场、波罗勉省8号园区负责人被捕 柬埔寨当局近日宣布逮捕两名涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动的人员，分别为西港金贝赌场负责人英达拉（Ing Dara，左）和波罗勉省8 号园区负责人英索克林（Eang Soklim，右）。 两处场所均被指与网络诈骗活动有关。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料： @jpz8i8
#国内资讯：辽宁省葫芦岛警方打掉一网络引流裸聊敲诈犯罪团伙，抓获4名嫌疑人 葫芦岛公安10月21日通报消息：近日，葫芦岛市公安局依托群众举报线索，成功打掉以唐某为首的实施网络引流、裸聊敲诈的新型涉恶犯罪团伙，抓获犯罪嫌疑人4名。 经查，自2026年5月起，该犯罪团伙利用境外通讯软件承接裸聊敲诈业务，在骗取获取被害人隐私视频影像后，窃取被害人社交群组信息，以曝光不雅隐私材料相要挟，采取网络“软暴力”方式实施敲诈勒索，逼迫被害人转账付款，严重扰乱网络空间秩序。 接到相关线索后，葫芦岛市公安局迅速开展核查研判，固定犯罪证据，组织警力开展集中抓捕，将该团伙4名成员全部抓获归案。 目前，4名犯罪嫌疑人已被依法采取刑事强制措施，案件正在进一步侦办中。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗：https://t.me/xigang8I8…
#巴基斯坦资讯：拉合尔59名网络诈骗嫌疑人被捕，警方查获大量电脑及手机设备 10月22日报道：近日，巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA）拉合尔分局开展专项执法行动，打击涉嫌针对外国公民及在线商业平台实施诈骗的犯罪团伙，共逮捕59名嫌疑人，其中包括52名男性和7名女性。 调查显示，涉案人员涉嫌通过多种方式实施网络及金融诈骗。一方面，嫌疑人冒充电信公司工作人员，以手机套餐升级、网络服务包及其他通信服务为诱饵，诱骗受害者付款；另一方面，部分人员涉嫌非法截留、转移与在线外卖平台相关联的餐饮商户资金，从中谋取非法利益。 行动中，执法人员共查获61台笔记本电脑、21套计算机系统以及52部手机。调查人员正对相关电子设备及数据展开进一步核查，以追查涉案账户、资金流向及其他可能参与犯罪的人员。 巴基斯坦执法部门指出，网络诈骗及非法转移商业资金的行为，不仅会给外国公民和当地商户造成经济损失，也会对数字商业环境及金融体系的安全与信誉带来负…
#柬埔寨资讯：警方破获一起绑架勒索案，成功营救1名中国籍受害者，逮捕4名中国籍嫌犯 10月19日下午，一名中国籍男子在柬埔寨西哈努克省（西港）遭犯罪分子绑架。接报后，柬埔寨警方迅速展开调查，并于10月21日凌晨在干拉省实施抓捕行动，成功营救受害者，逮捕4名中国籍犯罪嫌疑人。 据悉，10月19日下午，中国公民陈志斌（音译，Chen ZHIBIN）在西港第二区第三村遭一伙身份不明的人员绑架。 案件发生后，柬埔寨国家警察总署刑警局联合西哈努克省警察局及干拉省警察局展开调查。警方通过调查取证，逐步锁定涉案嫌疑人的身份及藏匿地点，并迅速部署抓捕行动。 10月21日凌晨3时，警方在干拉省一处地点展开行动，成功逮捕4名中国籍犯罪嫌疑人，分别为： HUANG QIAN（黄迁），男，31岁； HUANG HUI（黄辉），男，38岁； HUANG HAI（黄海），男，32岁； LUO MIN（罗敏），男，37岁。 此次行动中，警方成功解救…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,073 posts we hold for @baoguang7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西港日记-柬埔寨通@NMSL” (@baoguang7), 43,121 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.