Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,337. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,224–56,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 13:01
55,425
-54
9 Nov 2026, 21:16
55,479
-30
8 Nov 2026, 12:49
55,509
-23
7 Nov 2026, 08:37
55,532
-18
6 Nov 2026, 10:06
55,550
-15
5 Nov 2026, 12:01
55,565
-23
4 Nov 2026, 14:05
55,588
-32
3 Nov 2026, 14:09
55,620
-56
2 Nov 2026, 14:35
55,676
-40
1 Nov 2026, 12:36
55,716
+18
31 Oct 2026, 15:30
55,698
-7
30 Oct 2026, 17:56
55,705
-36
29 Oct 2026, 21:29
55,741
-32
28 Oct 2026, 22:10
55,773
-11
27 Oct 2026, 22:39
55,784
-26
27 Oct 2026, 00:50
55,810
-21
25 Oct 2026, 21:35
55,831
-22
24 Oct 2026, 19:45
55,853
-7
23 Oct 2026, 20:27
55,860
-25
22 Oct 2026, 19:40
55,885
first reading
Engagement
413 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 55,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 413 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
413 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,655,780
Reactions total
37,337
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 23:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,520
Videos
≈4,460
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 53m
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 188 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
127,638 reactions across 409 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
49,953
39.1%
😁
33,951
26.6%
❤
15,391
12.1%
💯
10,077
7.89%
😱
5,629
4.41%
😎
4,347
3.41%
🎃
3,077
2.41%
🙏
2,371
1.86%
😢
1,794
1.41%
🤔
898
0.704%
🤡
150
0.118%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 413 of the 413 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128,688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
314
across the posts below
Posts paid on
75
of 413 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fight_space. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 413 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.69%
7 of 413 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
13,200
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
13,500
over 406 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxELABx
1
2 November 2026
2 November 2026
2W5zFFukaCh
1
9 September 2026
9 September 2026
2W5zFGfJU4Z
1
19 September 2026
19 September 2026
2W5zFJ6H7HT
1
10 October 2026
10 October 2026
2W5zFJBzdyT
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
2W5zFJoRZUd
1
29 August 2026
29 August 2026
2W5zFJvzvjs
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 68 of 131 posts held from the last 30 days (51.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Как только что написал в соцсетях Илья Топурия, Усмана Нурмагомедова и тех, кто был с ним, якобы уже задержали правоохранители Абу-Даби.
Что же касается Двалишвили, то ему, судя по видео, все нравится, он находится в приподнятом настроении и, как опытный контент-мейкер, оперативно стримит прямо из больницы:
Не на ночь, как говорится, будет показано, но именно так сегодня происходила драка Мераба Двалишвили и Усмана Нурмагомедова, а также их сопровождающих в Абу-Даби.
Начал ее, судя по видео, Усман, а затем лихо продолжили все вместе.
Ясно одно — вряд ли теперь это можно будет спустить на тормозах.
Но немного о предыстории конфликта:
— UFC 311 (январь 2025):
Противостояние обострилось еще перед поединком Мераба Двал…
Рассерженный коллега Val обличает:
ребят вы когда пишете такое про хейни не забывайте в зеркало смотреть, а то на словах вы такие все из себя мудрые психологи и философы - а по факту убрали из постов не только коментарии, но и даже значок "палец вниз", не дай бог кольнут неодобрением ваше разжиревшее самомнение. не прячится ли там такая же неуверенность как и у хейни?
Во-первых, "разжиревшее самомнение" — это зву…
В Сан-Франциско состоялась пресс-конференция перед объединительным боем за титулы WBO и IBF в полусреднем весе между Девином Хейни и Лиамом Паро, который пройдет 19 декабря на арене Chase Center.
Хейни в особых представлениях не нуждается, а что касается Паро (28-1, 16 KO), то 30-летний австралиец достаточно крепкий и квалифицированный боец: в его послужном списке есть громкие победы над пуэрториканцем Сабриэлем Мат…
В Париже состоялась первая пресс-конференция перед боксерским поединком Джейка Пола и Седрика Думбе, который пройдет 24 декабря в Дубае.
У этого противостояния, помимо прочего, есть одна пикантная деталь: Думбе — боец PFL, которая после объединения с Most Valuable Promotions оказалась в одной бизнес-структуре с Джейком Полом.
Получается картина маслом: Думбе предстоит выйти на ринг против человека, который теперь в…
Во-первых, Александр Александрович Карелин, конечно, прав.
Во вторых, «каждому овощу свой сезон» — это не просто народная мудрость или «фраза про овощи», как выразился журналист, придумавший заголовок. Это прямая отсылка к литературной классике.
«Каждому овощу свой сезон» — так называется одна из глав в великолепной детской книжке «Все приключения рассеянного магистра» советского математика и популяризатора науки …
Ув. коллега Игорь Петров задается вопросом:
«Здравствуйте. Как считаете, не высоковато ли Дзюнто Накатани забрался в рейтинге P4P?»
Прежде чем ответить, напомним, как на данный момент выглядит топ-10 P4P по версии журнала The Ring:
1 Наоя Иноуэ
2 Александр Усик
3 Шакур Стивенсон
4 Джесси Родригес
5 Дэвид Бенавидес
6 Дмитрий Бивол
7 Дзюнто Накатани
8 Девин Хейни
9 Джейрон Эннис
10 О’Шаки Фостер
Дзюнто Накатани уже…
74-летний британский промоутер Фрэнк Уоррен заявил, что за всю свою карьеру не видел более страшной травмы, чем гематома Зака Миллера в проигранном субботнем бою против Галли Повара.
Выглядит и правда гротескно, но вряд ли сравнится по масштабу и драматизму с уфо-травмой Дениса Лебедева в бою против Гильермо Джонса
Объединительный поединок в первом среднем весе (до 69,9 кг) между Джейроном Эннисом (WBA, WBO) и Джошем Келли (IBF) якобы уже запланирован на 27 февраля и пройдет на State Farm Arena в Атланте, США.
Официальный анонс ожидается на днях.
После того, как Эннис с большой долей вероятности победит Келли, единственным кандидатом на бой в этом весе у него останется Себастьян Фундора (WBC).
Вся эта суматоха с предсказуем…
Три значимых шоу на этой неделе:
— Немков-Билостенный, PFL
— Ган-Хокит, UFC
— Адамес-Варбартон, Zuffa
И два из них, что характерно, от Даны Уайта — человека, которого накануне лишился Белый дом.
Это что же получается, не за горами тот день, когда Дана будет конкурировать не с остальным миром, а сам с собой?
👍88😁34❤11🎃4💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 413 posts we hold for @fight_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@fight_space edited 17 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ @vsembokslive · 38,438 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Usyk. The Cat. Oleksandr @Usyk17 · 24,740 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Лютиков / MMA, UFC, русский спорт @a_lutikov · 25,786 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
RCC: MMA & Boxing @rcc_sport · 32,282 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
يو إف سي عربية لايت 🦅☝️🐺 UFC ARABIA LITE @ufcarabia_lite_Star · 24,275 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 September 2026
Федерация Бокса России @RussianBoxers · 48,616 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
ВСЕМ БОКС @vsemboks · 19,134 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 October 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing @matveevmmaboxing · 23,370 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
محمود ميعاري @MahmoudMiariRT · 21,672 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC @dvoyechka · 25,523 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Панчер – UFC, ММА, Бокс @puncher_sports · 45,593 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Ночь в клетке @cagehorrornightreal · 21,447 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Матч! Боец @matchboets · 85,875 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
В світі боксу @v_sviti_boksu · 37,873 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 September 2026
KALUGIN MMA @kaluginboy · 54,591 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске) @prostokulaki · 28,327 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
UFC Eurasia @ufceurasia · 431,486 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 334 @allmma · 74,014 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
MMA review @topMMAreview · 28,018 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Main Card @MainCardMMA · 252,666 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Captain Hardcore @caphard · 38,234 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
VKIDKA ММА @vkidka_champ · 24,220 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV @hardcoremma · 24,501 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
BEST of MMA @mmabestof · 29,773 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FightSpace” (@fight_space), 55,425 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fight_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.