Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FIGHTER CHANNEL 👊

Channel

FIGHTER CHANNEL 👊

@FIGHTER_CHANNEL1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

14,481subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454946981
TypeChannel
Username@FIGHTER_CHANNEL1
Created12 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FIGHTER_CHANNEL1

Growth

14,48114,54214,511.56 August 2026 — 14,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,539 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,542 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,528 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,519 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,509 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,503 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,498 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,506 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,488 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,481 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,472–14,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:0314,481-7
14 Aug 2026, 12:0414,488-18
13 Aug 2026, 05:4814,506+8
12 Aug 2026, 07:0314,498-5
11 Aug 2026, 09:5614,503-6
10 Aug 2026, 08:2214,509-10
9 Aug 2026, 05:0214,519-9
8 Aug 2026, 05:5114,528-14
7 Aug 2026, 08:1414,542+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:4514,539no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:3414,539first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 14,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held87 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total200,920
Reactions total4,000
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 16s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,000 reactions across 87 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,78244.5%
🔥72818.2%
🤡46911.7%
😁3228.05%
2325.80%
👎992.48%
😭922.30%
🤣882.20%
🤔862.15%
👏431.07%
🤯340.85%
🏆100.25%
🤬80.2%
💯40.1%
😨30.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,000reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 87 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FIGHTER_CHANNEL1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC503 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🗣 Хргович объяснил, почему Итаума так популярен Филип Хргович считает, что огромная популярность Моисеса Итаумы во многом связана с тем, что он представляет Великобританию. Если бы он был из Болгарии, о нём никто бы не слышал. Он бы до сих пор выступал за сборную Болгарии и дрался за гроши, — заявил хорват. При этом Хргович признаёт талант Итаумы — его скорость и мощь. Но, по мнению Филипа, британец пока не прош

👍17🤔5

15 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC947 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🗣 Алимханулы уже знает, с кем хочет драться после Шираза Экс-чемпион в среднем весе - Жанибек Алимханулы отреагировал на назначение боя с Хамзой Ширазом и сразу заговорил о следующей большой цели. Казахстанец заявил, что не может дождаться поединка и верит, что скоро станет чемпионом мира в двух весовых категориях. А затем обратился к Саулю «Канело» Альваресу: Канело, готовься. Дай Бог, я побью Шираза и мы объе

👍13😁11🤡3

15 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,160 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎬 Джошуа провёл бой с тенью на заднем дворе Энтони Джошуа сейчас на отдыхе, но даже там продолжает тренироваться.

🔥22😁6🤡5

15 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,310 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🚫 Уайлдер мог подраться с Фишером, но отказался Джонни Фишер рассказал, что в числе возможных соперников на его бой в Стамбуле был сам Деонтей Уайлдер. По словам британца, предложение ему озвучили Эдди Хирн и Турки Аль-аш-Шейх. Фишер согласился практически сразу, однако до поединка дело так и не дошло. Планировалось большое шоу с участием Александра Усика, но из-за организационных проблем мероприятие отменили. П

👍12🤡51

14 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,950 views94 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🗣Хргович не боится Итауму: Я его побью Филип Хргович уверен, что его рано списывают со счетов перед боем с Мозесом Итаумой. Хорват считает, что британца слишком сильно превозносят и сравнивают с новым Майком Тайсоном. Мне 34 года, у меня много опыта, энергии и силы. Это самый важный бой в моей жизни — и я его побью. Его финты против меня не сработают. На уклоны вниз я отвечу джебом, на атаку с левой — контрударо

👍58😁303🤡3

14 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,030 views63 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🗣 Гвоздик: Боксировать за копейки в этом возрасте уже не хочется Александр Гвоздик рассказал о своём будущем в профессиональном боксе. 39-летний экс-чемпион мира признался, что сейчас хочет сосредоточиться на других направлениях: Боксировать за копейки уже не хочется. Да и возраст уже такой… Почти 40 лет. — заявил Гвоздик При этом Гвоздик не объявляет о завершении карьеры. Если поступят достойные предложения, у

🤡42👍164👎1

14 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,110 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​⚠️ WBO обязала Шираза драться с Джанибеком WBO обязала Хамзу Шираза провести защиту титула против бывшего объединённого чемпиона мира в среднем весе Джанибека Алимханулы. Сторонам дали 20 дней на переговоры. Если договориться не удастся, может начаться процедура промоутерских.

🔥37👍3

14 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈2,050 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🎬 В преддверии возвращения Райана Гарсии вспоминаем его бой с Фонсекой В феврале 2019 года Райан Гарсия вышел на ринг против Франсиско Фонсеки и завершил бой практически мгновенно. Уже в стартовом раунде Гарсия нокаутировал соперника точным левым боковым.

🔥22👍52

14 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈2,120 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​❗️Фьюри — Джошуа под угрозой срыва? Поединок Тайсона Фьюри и Энтони Джошуа пока не имеет стопроцентной гарантии. Промоутер Фьюри Фрэнк Уоррен заявил, что команда Тайсона свою часть соглашения уже подписала, а теперь всё зависит от стороны Джошуа. По словам Уоррена, если представители AJ не примут предложенные условия, боя не будет. Главный спор — место проведения. Джошуа и Эдди Хирн хотят получить дополнительны

😁15👍10👎21

14 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,130 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎬 Классика супертяжелого веса: Паркер переиграл Уайлдера 3 года назад – Джозеф Паркер одержал одну из самых значимых побед в своей карьере, победив Деонтея Уайлдера. Паркер полностью контролировал ход поединка и не позволил Уайлдеру реализовать главное оружие — правый прямой. После 12 раундов все судьи отдали победу новозеландцу: 118–111, 118–110 и 120–108.

🔥34👍10👏3🤡21

14 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,170 views63 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​🗣Кроуфорд: Я бы на 1000% нокаутировал Пакьяо Терренс Кроуфорд назвал Мэнни Пакьяо бойцом, с которым он больше всего хотел встретиться в ринге. По словам «Бада», их поединок несколько раз был близок к организации, но до дела так и не дошло. Кроуфорд уверен в своём исходе: Я бы на 1000% его нокаутировал! - заявил американец При этом американец заявил, что команда Пакьяо якобы не хотела этого боя.

👎30👍23🤡91

14 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC≈2,280 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​❗️Куда пропал Мартин Баколе? После яркой победы над Джаредом Андерсоном в 2024 году Мартин Баколе считался одним из самых опасных тяжеловесов. Но затем — поражение от Джозефа Паркера, ничья с Эфе Аджагбой и главное: с мая 2025 года Баколе больше не дрался. Бывший промоутер Бен Шалом считает, что проблемы с формой и отсутствие активности серьёзно тормозят карьеру боксёра. По его мнению, после крупных заработков Б

👍187😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @FIGHTER_CHANNEL1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@FIGHTER_CHANNEL1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 415,556 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FIGHTER CHANNEL 👊” (@FIGHTER_CHANNEL1), 14,481 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIGHTER_CHANNEL1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.