12 measurements spanning 10 days, net +499. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,973–22,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:17
22,602
+368
14 Aug 2026, 10:23
22,234
+89
12 Aug 2026, 23:15
22,145
-6
11 Aug 2026, 21:07
22,151
+12
10 Aug 2026, 21:41
22,139
+84
10 Aug 2026, 00:01
22,055
-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:53
22,057
-14
8 Aug 2026, 03:05
22,071
-14
7 Aug 2026, 04:25
22,085
-17
6 Aug 2026, 05:50
22,102
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:15
22,103
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:07
22,103
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.8%
avg views ÷ 22,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,900
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
65 (29 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
775,640
Reactions total
37,464
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,890
Videos
≈553
Links
≈2,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
49s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34,434 reactions across 60 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18,333
53.2%
👍
5,748
16.7%
🤣
3,743
10.9%
🔥
2,816
8.18%
🤯
1,905
5.53%
💔
857
2.49%
❤🔥
279
0.81%
😁
247
0.717%
😢
209
0.607%
🤬
182
0.529%
🎃
36
0.105%
😱
36
0.105%
🙏
24
0.07%
☃
19
0.055%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 65 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @matveevmmaboxing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.54%
1 of 65 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
13,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12,100
over 64 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💣 Если честно, я бы сделал на одном турнире в начале 2027 вот это:
🇷🇺🇧🇷 Махачев — Пратес
🇰🇿🇪🇨 Рахмонов — Моралес
Почему сначала Карлос Пратес? Да всё просто — это САМЫЙ зрелищный нокаутёр всего UFC прямо сейчас. У бразильца есть то самое КАСАНИЕ СМЕРТИ, когда можно всего одним ударом решить исход боя вне зависимости от его течения. Пратесу плевать, если он летит 0-4 и ему провели 15 тейкдаунов. Он все равно выйдет …
🏆 Самые впечатляющие рекорды за всю историю UFC.
🇺🇸 Джон Джонс — 22-1
🇨🇦 Жорж Сен-Пьер — 20-2
🇷🇺 Ислам Махачев — 18-1
🇷🇺 Хабиб Нурмагомедов — 13-0
🇺🇸 Деметриус Джонсон — 15-2-1
🇦🇺 Александр Волкановски — 15-3
🇬🇪 Мераб Двалишвили — 14-3
Это чтобы вы лучше понимали, насколько сложно набрать 18-1 в UFC. То есть представьте себе, всего ДВА человека в истории проиграли не больше одного раза, когда провели 19+ боёв в лиг…
🤬 Меня поражает, что люди даже сейчас ХЕЙТЯТ Ислама. Якобы Махачев неуверенно победил, много пассивной борьбы показал. Так скажите, ефрейторы Подпивасных Войск, каким образом Ислам должен был действовать активнее, если напротив него 28-летний, физически мощный, здоровенный ЁБАНЫЙ КОНЬ? Который, на минуточку, не кукурузу под Дублином сторожил, а ТОЖЕ готовился к главному бою жизни.
И даже в те моменты, где Махачев пе…
👑🇷🇺 ЭТО ВЕЛИЧИЕ. ИСЛАМ МАХАЧЕВ ПИШЕТ ИСТОРИЮ.
✅ 17-матчевая победная серия в UFC. Абсолютный рекорд за всю историю лиги.
✅ 18-1 в UFC за 11 лет в промоушене, один из лучших рекордов в истории.
✅ Почти 900 дней лидерства в рейтинге Pound-for-Pound и, очевидно, 1000+ тоже пробьёт, что удавалось только Джону Джонсу.
✅ 4-й боец в истории, защитивший титулы в двух весах.
✅ 5 защит в двух весах, 7 титульных побед в UF…
Гэрри забрал первые 2 минуты раунда, очень сильный миддл-кик попал, справа одиночный прямой зашёл шикарно. Но затем Ислам перевёл и просидел 2,5 минуты за спиной в опасной позиции. Скорее всего увидим 3-2 для Махачева сейчас.
#UFC330
Формально Ислам за счёт тейкдаунов и контроля должен забирать раунд, но... Гэрри много накидывал из защитной позиции и подразбил лицо Махачеву. Урон обычно ценится ВЫШЕ контроля позиции.
#UFC330
Гэрри настолько спокойно себя чувствует под борцовским прессингом, что разговаривает с рефери по поводу ноги Ислама в тот момент, когда Ислам у него на спине повис.
#UFC330
У Гэрри такие долгие хай-кики справа, что Ислам может попить чай с урбечем, пока летит нога. А вот облик-кики куда опаснее, но пока что без последствий.
#UFC330
ОХЕРЕТЬ. ИСЛАМ РОНЯЕТ В НОКДАУН ГЭРРИ ХАЙ-КИКОМ.
#UFC330
❤226🤯84🔥41👍3🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @matveevmmaboxing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@matveevmmaboxing edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,421 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
REDFURYMMA @REDFURYFT · 108,198 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Main Card @MainCardMMA · 232,375 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
UFC Eurasia @ufceurasia · 420,077 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matveev | MMA & Boxing” (@matveevmmaboxing), 22,602 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matveevmmaboxing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
