💥👩🏼🦰 Мовсар Евлоев - о женских боях: "Стоит создать для них отдельный UFC и мы поглядим, кто это будет смотреть" "Я не смотрю женские бои. Не могу их смотреть, это очень тяжело. Может быть, один только бой мне понравился - это был второй бой Енджейчик и Намаюнас. Хороший бой, высокий уровень. Другие бои... Я не так много смотрел женских боев, но все, которые я смотрел, не были хороши. Может быть, им стоить отдельну…

Channel
Ночь в клетке
@cagehorrornightreal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,305subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455374572 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cagehorrornightreal |
| Created | 25 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cagehorrornightreal |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 21,305 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 21,306 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 21,309 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 21,308 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 21,313 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 21,316 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 21,310 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:25 | 21,313 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 21,312 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 21,317 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 21,316 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 21,293 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 21,297 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 21,301 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 21,305 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 21,313 | -16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 21,329 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 21,330 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 21,332 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 21,333 | first reading |
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.9%
- avg views ÷ 21,305 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,000
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 220,740 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 41s
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.39%
- 1 of 72 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 14,100
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 13,700
- over 71 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| KW2aPRYdr5QoPXHUFRnEZYwGqMHMWKp1ay4F3HPo5rR73DXTG2X3Y99EZwuhW7vA | 1 | 30 July 2026 | 30 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
💥📣 Джастин Гэтжи: "Я до сих пор не могу бить панчи. Обе руки по-прежнему болят с последнего боя. У меня большая гематома на колене, еще с Рождества. Она у меня два боя, и никак не заживает. До конца года я просто наслаждаюсь чемпионством, я и так подрался уже два раза в этом году. Я поговорю с семьей, мы все взвесим, и я приму решение. Я только что выступил лучше, чем когда-либо прежде, и победил человека, которого…
💥👩🏼🦰 Жена Генри Сехудо и он сам были впечатлены залетом в клетку Усмана Нурмагомедова после боя Умара. "Это настоящая братская любовь. Очень мощно" Генри Сехудо: "Бро, младший брат Умара Усман перелетел через чертову клетку с такой скоростью, что оказался первым, кто притронулся к Умару. И он почти зарядил локтем с вращением Сонгу. Когда мы говорим о братской любви - вот это она и есть. Если надо показать, что это …
💥🚙 Петр Ян продал Усману Нурмагомедову BMW за 13 млн "На начальной стадии мне дарили Камри 3.5, сороковку. Шустрая такая тачка. Одна из первых моих машин. Пятьдесятпятка Камри была тоже. Потом из запоминающихся - Порш Кайенн купил себе в 2018 году. Тоже классная машина, поездил я на ней недолго. Потом у меня был BMW X5 Competition. У меня эту машину купил брат Хабиба, Усман купил. Этих машин в России всего было 12…
💥💰 Усман Нурмагомедов: "Миллион долларов вообще не деньги. Че это такое? Что на них можно сделать?" *** - Если бы у тебя был сейчас миллион долларов и им нужно было распорядиться в моменте - куда бы ты его направил? - Миллион долларов - это очень маленькие деньги, брат. Ты хотя бы нормальную сумму возьми, да. Миллион долларов - че такое? Это небольшие деньги, честно сказать. Что можно сделать на миллион долларов? …
💥☠️ Нокаут в бою Умара и Сонга стал третьим самым ярким случаем антиборцовского апперкота в UFC 1️⃣ Франсис Нганну vs Кейн Веласкез Крайне интересный случай. Веласкез, по сути, уже прошел зону опасности, его левая рука была за коленом Нганну, голова почти на его груди. Но Нганну создал мизерное пространство и ударил без замаха короткий апперкот. Веласкез, как потом сам вспоминал, уснул и проснулся уже на земле от б…
💥⚔️ Что ждет Умара дальше, теперь его нельзя называть частью Большой четверки? Сначала еще по бою 1️⃣ Удивило, что Умар так легко отпустил Сонга в 1-м раунде, забрав спину. Да, Сонг встал, но это не проблема, главное не потерять захват. Умар быстро забрал спину, но тут же поспешил, полез на шею, перекатился и потерял позицию. Очень важный момент. 2️⃣ При такой гибкости и тайской базе Умар маловато выжимает с удар…
💥🥊 Кстати, это второй нокаут апперкотом в UFC для Сонга. Первый раз этим ударом положил Марлона Мораеса Если еще раз им вырубит - сравняется с Нганну по количеству нокаутов апперкотом Подборка в UFC у китайца хорошая: два апперкота (Умар, Мораес), левый боковой (Симон), правый прямой (Перес), локоть (Арантес), хайкик (Арче) #нвк
C каждым годом все невероятнее видится то, что Хабиб за 29 боев не побывал в нокдауне Умар трижды падал в нокдауны (раз - с нокаутом), Усман был во флэш-нокдауне в реванше с Хьюзом. Махачев трижды (Мартинс, Рамос, Волкановски), а Хабиб устоял Гэтжи, Порье, Конор, Джонсон, Барбоза, РДА - вполне себе группа людей, чтобы хотя бы раз уронить. И ведь не сказать, что в стойке и проходах Хабиб не рисковал - еще как рисков…
Усман, конечно, начудил после боя... ткнул Сонга в кадык выставленной рукой, потом как будто попытался ударить локтем с вращением Прыгать на нокаутированного Умара, как на убитого, и так трясти его, наваливаться - тоже немного перебор... Человек на жестких отходняках, вот так прыгать и тормошить его - это и навредить можно. Но понять его легко, конечно. Твоего старшего брата у тебя на глазах жестко вырубили, еще и …
💥☠️ Больше всего финишей в истории легчайшего веса UFC 🇪🇨 Марлон Вера / 10 финишей в 135 фунтах UFC 🇨🇳 Сонг Ядонг / 7 🇺🇸 Юрайя Фейбер / 7 🇺🇸 Роб Фонт / 7 🇺🇸 Шон О'Мэлли / 7 За Сонга можно только порадоваться. Он начал профессиональную карьеру в (!) 15 лет. Выступает уже 13 лет. 35 боев в профи к 28 годам. Впервые в UFC он пробил свой личный потолок и победил настоящего топа. У Яна, О'Мэлли, Сэндхэгена он забир…
Нельзя сказать, что совсем такого было не увидеть. Из всей команды Хабиба у Умара такое положение тела в стойке, такие особенности, что он попадает под удары, раскрывается. То, как он убирает голову, как перетекает из позиции в позицию. Этим и Баутиста воспользовался, и вот сегодня Сонг. У Усмана все плавно, текуче, он не подставляется, очень чувствительный, голову убирает, как никто. Махачев очень солидно стоит, ни…
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @cagehorrornightreal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cagehorrornightreal edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@matveevmmaboxing · 22,661#1
@dvoyechka · 22,402#2
@ufc5043 · 5,765#3
@VeschyOleg · 12,260#4
@mmamemes_rus · 14,398#5
@ushatayka · 11,299#6
@stoechka · 8,121#7
@hardcoremma · 24,220#8
@kaluginboy · 50,501#9
@face_of_fight · 1,172#10
@oiboi_mma · 2,448#11
@vestnik_mma · 26,118#12
@ufceurasia · 417,201#13
@TikhomirovMMA · 3,909#14
@mmabestof · 29,625#15
@seushatayka · 14,235#16
@MainCardMMA · 212,170#17
@kaluginvladislav · 8,986#18
@suchkitony · 12,085#19
@REDFURYFT · 107,153#20
@a_lutikov · 25,547#21
@IgorKakDela1 · 27,446#22
@mmaanalitik · 8,085#23
@topMMAreview · 27,978#24
@fight_space · 56,344#25
@mmagrizzly · 1,232#26
@PaulStrikerGregor · 3,000#27
@vkidka_champ · 23,407#28
@voktagone · 8,346#29
@matchboets · 86,202#30
@krovavi_sport · 2,431#31
@voinskoeserdce · 632#32
@subsquadtg · 4,496#33
@telesportudar · 2,816#34
@homelandermma · 64#35
@medoedmma · 318#36
@metamma · 5,356#37
@mmaboxing24 · 7,533#38
@mmadream · 466#39
@BOXEOLOCO · 1,513#40
@fightfieldmma · 207#41
@coefmylife · 7,195#42
@MMA_PIEEE · 1,106#43
@p0dorozhnikmma · 4,484#44
@KneeToBody · 283#45
@battle_lairMMA · 1,788#46
@MMA_IQ_OFF · 3,271#47
@mma4oz · 15,111#48
@echo_of_boxing · 1,583#49
@Fighters_Voice · 589#50
@mma_science · 631#51
@bondurant1984 · 1,374#52
@draki_net_mma · 3,606#53
@kalininnews · 1,531 (as read 24 September 2026)#54
@allmma · 70,574#55
@prostokulaki · 28,182#56
@udartvchannel · 9,686#57
@Casual_mma · 1,193#58
@caphard · 37,800#59
@NVK_Culture49 · 1,241#60
@aslanbek_badaev · 15,161#61
@mash · 3,096,804#62
@rhymestg · 1,414,552#63
@maegerivchudan · 152#64
@pgorodnitskiy · 50,554#65
@mma_vest · 1,074#66
@rinatgladiator · 4,691#67
@myachpro · 365,418#68
@sportsru · 440,335#69
@ru2ch · 650,396#70
@match_tv · 670,953#71
@ograblenieufc · 2,237#72
@hardcore_fightingtg · 252,770#73
@pervsport · 91,549#74
@fightingbets777 · 133#75
@ejdailyru · 649,498#76
@GOAL24Main · 888,275#77
@mma_tg · 98,419#78
@poluchkamag · 16,577#79
@realmadridcdf · 328,287#80
@svtvnews · 113,037#81
@rflive · 227,389#82
@victoriadudakova7 · 639 (as read 24 September 2026)#83
@dvachannel · 938,773#84
@bazabazon · 1,535,150#85
@jolybells · 358,951#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dvoyechka · 22,402
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@matveevmmaboxing · 22,661
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
@a_lutikov · 25,547
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@kaluginboy · 50,501
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@hardcoremma · 24,220
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
@vestnik_mma · 26,118
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
@fight_space · 56,344
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
@IgorKakDela1 · 27,446
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@vkidka_champ · 23,407
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
@topMMAreview · 27,978
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
@MainCardMMA · 212,170
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@allmma · 70,574
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@REDFURYFT · 107,153
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@ufceurasia · 417,201
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@ufc330i · 22,715
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
@matchboets · 86,202
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@prostokulaki · 28,182
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@borba_wrestling_tg · 63,625
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@vsembokslive · 38,558
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
@caphard · 37,800
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@nashedelo_official · 53,044
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
@puncher_sports · 46,601
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
@sportbezgranits · 45,836
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
@acamma_russia · 47,688
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ночь в клетке” (@cagehorrornightreal), 21,305 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cagehorrornightreal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.