Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Матч! Боец

Channel

Матч! Боец

@matchboets

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

85,875subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151290345
TypeChannel
Username@matchboets
DescriptionКанал о том, что вы любите № 4833786151
Created9 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/matchboets

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@matchboets/39026 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC@match_tv/1242855 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC1.002.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@match_tv39 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0038 minutes@match_tv (36–3)
@news_matchtv29 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutes@news_matchtv (22–7)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 903 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

85,67587,03086,352.585,8756 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,472–87,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 12:1785,875-51
8 Nov 2026, 20:5985,926-24
7 Nov 2026, 12:1585,950-30
6 Nov 2026, 09:1185,980-45
5 Nov 2026, 12:3686,025-45
4 Nov 2026, 11:0486,070-45
3 Nov 2026, 11:3086,115-38
2 Nov 2026, 08:5986,153-78
1 Nov 2026, 05:5986,231-46
31 Oct 2026, 05:0086,277-39
30 Oct 2026, 07:3686,316-47
29 Oct 2026, 08:3586,363-77
28 Oct 2026, 07:0786,440-84
27 Oct 2026, 03:2986,524-114
25 Oct 2026, 23:5486,638-392
24 Oct 2026, 20:2787,030+1,355
23 Oct 2026, 17:2885,675-3
22 Oct 2026, 16:5185,678-54
21 Oct 2026, 08:3685,732-33
20 Oct 2026, 09:1685,765first reading

Engagement

1,413 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.57%
avg views ÷ 85,875 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,500
452 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
452
of 1,413 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 451 of 452 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held1,413 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total2,937,737
Reactions total42,223
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 19:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈25,400
Videos
≈2,620
Links
≈14,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
57m 51s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

84,620 reactions across 998 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤37,84344.7%
🔥13,16715.6%
👍8,48410.0%
🤣4,1394.89%
🤡2,9013.43%
👎2,1312.52%
😁2,1212.51%
🏆2,1182.50%
❤‍🔥2,0692.45%
👏1,8392.17%
😢1,4131.67%
⚡7710.911%
💯7630.902%
😭6330.748%
🤮6010.71%
🕊4830.571%
🙏3960.468%
🥱3960.468%
🥰2990.353%
💔2960.35%
41 further kinds1,7572.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84,620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 72 of 452 posts held from the last 30 days (15.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,940 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🥉 Тхэквондист Башир Аджиев завоевал бронзовую медаль юношеских Олимпийских игр в Дакаре В полуфинале в весовой категории свыше 73 кг он проиграл представителю Испании Ивану Лысенко Серрано. @news_matchtv 🥇 Наш канал в MAX 📷 Олимпийский комитет России

❤9

11 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC≈3,270 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Силягин и Кооль сделали вес перед боями в Краснодаре 🥊 В главном поединке вечера Силягин встретится с иранцем Мехраби: вес Павла составил 77,9 кг, а Сайджада – 78,3 кг. Кооль проведет бой с представителем Узбекистана Аскаровым. Евгений показал на весах 68,9 кг, а Сухроб – 69,9 кг. Турнир Мелбет Лига бокса. Битва за контракт посмотрим завтра в 18:55 на Матч! Боец 📺 Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ 📷 Федерация бокса Ро…

❤14🔥5

11 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC≈4,610 views140 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В Абу-Даби завязалась потасовка между Двалишвили и Усманом Нурмагомедовым. Грузин выложил видео, на котором он в крови. Мераб давал интервью RAF в холле отеля. К нему подошёл Усман с компанией людей. После пощёчины началась драка. Подробностями поделился сам Двалишвили. Кусок ролика с потасовкой опубликовал Илия Топурия. 🥇 Наш канал в MAX

🤬74❤34🤡24🤮5🙊3

11 Nov 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,700 views57 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Медич ОЧЕНЬ любит заканчивать бои досрочно: 100% финишей в карьере. А в UFC он побеждает только нокаутом 😎 Как думаете, сможет Урош оформить девятый нокаут в бою с Холлэндом на UFC 334? Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

❤34💯14🔥9

11 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC≈6,180 views89 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

2026 – потрясающий год для Хокита 👀 Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

🔥62❤14🏆8👍4👏1

11 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈6,680 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Решения о дальнейшей карьере Усмана пока нет. Но Умар уверен в брате – он способен конкурировать на высочайшем уровне: 🗣 Еще не ясно, где он будет выступать. Будет лучше, если Усман сам расскажет о своем решении, когда подпишет контракт. Но я в любом случае буду рядом, – сказал Умар. Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

🔥55❤16👍8👎8

11 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC≈6,610 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Нунес может сравняться с Джонсоном по количеству побед в титульниках 🏆 Но сначала надо разобраться с Харрисон на UFC 334. Посмотрим чемпионский бой в женском легчайшем весе уже в эти выходные на Матч! Боец 📺 Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

👏34❤9❤‍🔥4🤡3

11 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC≈6,730 views183 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Хокит готовится к бою с Ганом: Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ 📷 соцсети Джоша

🤣108😁51❤15🔥6👍3

11 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC≈6,950 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Дайджест: 👀 Ган ответил на претензии по поводу «грязного» стиля боя 👊 Перейра продолжает подготовку к Павловичу 🏆 Волков опубликовал рисунок в соцсетях с просьбой дать ему титульник 📊 Обновленные рейтинги UFC тут 🤔 Бадаев считает, что UFC выгоднее, чтобы Хокит победил Гана 🥊 Шумков высказался о следующем поединке Силягина 💪 Силягин заявил, что полностью восстановился после травмы глаза и готов вернуться в титу…

🔥12❤3😎1

11 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC≈7,450 views81 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Главные герои UFC 334 встретились лицом к лицу ⚔️ Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ 📷 UFC

❤49🔥23👍6💯3

10 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC≈8,410 views85 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Изучаем последние результаты участников главного боя UFC 334 👊 Кто победит в эти выходные? Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

❤48👍22🔥11🤮3🤡1

10 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈8,220 views116 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ган ответил на претензии по поводу «грязного» стиля боя 👀 Они точно не отрабатывают это на тренировках ☝️ Вот такие аргументы 🤷 Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ

❤55🤡37🤣14👏6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,413 posts we hold for @matchboets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@matchboets edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @matchboets as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 32 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 21:59 UTCFinal Results3,290 voters approx.

Оценка UFC 333?

  1. 578%
  2. 416%
  3. 33%
  4. 20%
  5. 12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 21:54 UTCFinal Results4,130 voters approx.

Лучший бой UFC 333?

  1. Волкановски vs Евлоев9%
  2. Ян vs Двалишвили88%
  3. Волков vs Куниев1%
  4. Доусон vs Алиев0%
  5. Тикнесс vs Чопуров0%
  6. Вагаев vs Малкун0%
  7. Сантос vs Оки0%
  8. Лусиндо vs Кальяри0%

Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 21:49 UTCFinal Results3,380 voters approx.

Лучший финиш UFC 333?

  1. Волкановски vs Евлоев (ТКО)52%
  2. Кавана vs Темиров (ТКО)21%
  3. Пико vs Кейта (ТКО)5%
  4. Рейес vs Мурзаканов (ТКО)8%
  5. Яхьяев vs Крылов (ТКО)7%
  6. Магомедов vs Роустон (Гильотина)5%
  7. Стил vs Гуньон (КО)1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 21:35 UTCAnonymous Poll2,880 voters approx.

Волкановски – величайший полулегковес в истории?

  1. Да, без вариантов87%
  2. Нет13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTCAnonymous Poll3,130 voters approx.

Первый раунд

  1. Волкановски46%
  2. Евлоев54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 20:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,820 voters approx.

Кто победит?

  1. Алекс44%
  2. Мовсар56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

UFC Eurasia
@ufceurasia · 431,486
#1
Main Card
@MainCardMMA · 252,666
#2
MMA MEMES
@mmamemes_rus · 14,635
#3
Панчер – UFC, ММА, Бокс
@puncher_sports · 45,593
#4
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске)
@prostokulaki · 28,327
#5
Андреев | Ушатайка
@ushatayka · 11,398
#6
Вестник MMA
@vestnik_mma · 26,206
#7
Hardcore Fighting
@hardcore_fightingtg · 241,188
#8
KALUGIN MMA
@kaluginboy · 54,591
#9
Captain Hardcore
@caphard · 38,114
#10
REDFURYMMA
@REDFURYFT · 107,460
#11
Чемпионат
@championat · 248,000
#12
Игорь, как дела?
@IgorKakDela1 · 27,224
#13
Ночь в клетке
@cagehorrornightreal · 21,447
#14
BEST of MMA
@mmabestof · 29,735
#15
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV
@hardcoremma · 24,501
#16
Вещий Олег
@VeschyOleg · 12,064
#17
В Октагоне | ММА, ЮФС, Бокс
@voktagone · 8,252
#18
Ушатайка
@seushatayka · 14,821
#19
Matveev | MMA & Boxing
@matveevmmaboxing · 23,370
#20
Vlad Kalugin
@kaluginvladislav · 9,375
#21
MMA и смешные единоборства | Вадим Тихомиров х Спортс"
@TikhomirovMMA · 4,058
#22
MMA review
@topMMAreview · 28,018
#23
VKIDKA ММА
@vkidka_champ · 23,742
#24
Нарижный об ММА | Ой бой!
@oiboi_mma · 2,436
#25
FightSpace
@fight_space · 55,425
#26
Культура бития
@mmaboxing24 · 7,372
#27
Аналитика ММА
@mmaanalitik · 8,161
#28
Meta MMA
@metamma · 5,004
#29
𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐕𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞 | 𝐌𝐌𝐀, 𝐔𝐅𝐂
@Fighters_Voice · 621
#30
Чемп.FIGHTS / Бокс и ММА
@ChampFights · 18,096
#31
ПолСтрайкер #ConorKing
@PaulStrikerGregor · 2,994
#32
РБ Спорт | MMA
@rbsportmma · 8,718
#33
Матч ТВ
@match_tv · 666,810
#34
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 305,791
#35
Спортс“
@sportsru · 457,801
#36
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#37
Матч ТВ. Только новости
@news_matchtv · 89,863
#38
Медийка
@mediyca · 1,089,486
#39
Двоечка ММА | UFC
@dvoyechka · 25,523
#40
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,527,518
#41
GOAL24
@GOAL24Main · 860,774
#42
50-43
@ufc5043 · 5,789
#43
Чисто Стоечка | UFC, бои, железо
@stoechka · 8,476
#44
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,880,315
#45
МЯЧ Production
@myachpro · 357,936
#46
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#47
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 194,395
#48
Наше Дело
@nashedelo_official · 52,072
#49
FONBET Кубок России
@russiancup_official · 127,361
#50
Реальный Футбол LIVE
@rflive · 227,049
#51
Крысева 🐀 | Медиа футбич
@KrysMF23 · 135,209
#52
Матч! Медиафутбол
@match_media · 36,482
#53
Матч! Хоккей
@hockey_match · 57,071
#54
Матч! Данк
@match_basket_dunk · 20,866
#55
Aslanbek Badaev
@aslanbek_badaev · 15,189
#56
Main Transfers
@mtransfers · 114,792
#57
2DROTS
@twodrotsshow · 211,896
#58
Первый спорт
@pervsport · 90,809
#59
MMA TG
@mma_tg · 104,597 (as read 18 August 2026)
#60
Фабрицио | Трансферы
@fabrizio_transfery · 92,426
#61
ПФК ЦСКА
@pfccskamoscow · 183,978
#62
ACA MMA
@acamma_russia · 47,811
#63
НЕКЛАСИКО
@neclasic0 · 96,932
#64
Голос Дагестана/Новости Дагестана
@golosdagestana05 · 340,737
#65
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 181,756
#66
ЖИЗНЬ ФУТБОЛ
@zhfootballll · 521,454
#67
Спорт-Экспресс | Sport-Express
@sportexpress · 101,824
#68
МИРОВОЙ ФУТБОЛ
@sportsrufootball · 76,574
#69
Футбол 24/7 | Лига Чемпионов
@footballhourss · 145,850
#70
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,806,516
#71
Real Madrid CF | Реал Мадрид
@realmadridcdf · 335,820
#72
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#73
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,529
#74
ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 269,399
#75
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,670
#76
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,088,291
#77
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,342
#78
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,022,997
#79
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,404,643
#80
ОПГ Лит Энерджи ⚽️
@fclit_official · 94,414
#81
ФК «Динамо» Махачкала
@dinmx · 32,245
#82
Нетипичная Махачкала © | Дагестан
@official_atypical · 228,013
#83
FC BARCELONA
@newsbarca · 322,122
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Панчер – UFC, ММА, Бокс
@puncher_sports · 45,593
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
UFC Eurasia
@ufceurasia · 431,486
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске)
@prostokulaki · 28,327
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
Hardcore Fighting
@hardcore_fightingtg · 241,188
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Игорь, как дела?
@IgorKakDela1 · 27,224
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Main Card
@MainCardMMA · 252,666
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
VKIDKA ММА
@vkidka_champ · 23,742
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 334
@allmma · 74,014
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Наше Дело
@nashedelo_official · 52,072
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
Лютиков / MMA, UFC, русский спорт
@a_lutikov · 25,786
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
BEST of MMA
@mmabestof · 29,735
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
FightSpace
@fight_space · 55,425
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Captain Hardcore
@caphard · 38,114
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
REDFURYMMA
@REDFURYFT · 107,460
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV
@hardcoremma · 24,501
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
RCC: MMA & Boxing
@rcc_sport · 32,529
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
KALUGIN MMA
@kaluginboy · 54,591
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
MMA review
@topMMAreview · 28,018
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Вестник MMA
@vestnik_mma · 26,206
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ
@vsembokslive · 38,438
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
ACA MMA
@acamma_russia · 47,811
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing
@matveevmmaboxing · 23,370
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Ночь в клетке
@cagehorrornightreal · 21,447
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC
@dvoyechka · 25,523
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Матч! Боец” (@matchboets), 85,875 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matchboets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.