Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +6,975. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,125–42,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 08:02
41,391
+85
16 Sept 2026, 22:40
41,306
+51
15 Sept 2026, 01:37
41,255
+94
13 Sept 2026, 12:38
41,161
+182
11 Sept 2026, 19:02
40,979
+40
9 Sept 2026, 04:40
40,939
+33
5 Sept 2026, 21:59
40,906
+74
3 Sept 2026, 22:41
40,832
+56
2 Sept 2026, 14:57
40,776
+69
1 Sept 2026, 13:16
40,707
+113
31 Aug 2026, 12:36
40,594
+77
30 Aug 2026, 13:55
40,517
+219
29 Aug 2026, 11:48
40,298
+215
28 Aug 2026, 14:15
40,083
+227
27 Aug 2026, 17:29
39,856
+379
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
39,477
+646
25 Aug 2026, 15:37
38,831
+1,178
24 Aug 2026, 14:24
37,653
+3,147
22 Aug 2026, 21:28
34,506
-7
21 Aug 2026, 13:17
34,513
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 41,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,340
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
38 (31 July 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
106,860
Reactions total
1,739
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 03:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,860
Videos
≈482
Links
≈865
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 11s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,791 reactions across 38 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5224310953708902281
1,719
45.3%
custom 5276417209181158082
1,588
41.9%
custom 5463266385549357117
440
11.6%
custom 5355087270443499446
44
1.16%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.63%
1 of 38 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,890
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,290
over 37 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHTEPdT
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 17 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вы знаете, я очень люблю гулять. Просто по городу, потому что в такие прогулки всегда появляются неожиданные находки. Какие-то старые двери, маленькие рисунки на асфальте, новые заведения, о которых никогда не слышал раньше, скамейки в парке, когда можешь выбрать любимую, закат, который случайно застал тебя врасплох.
И от всего этого так явно веет добром, спокойствием. Вот вы знали, что в субботу прошел Международны…
1. Работа, которую я бы с радостью забрала домой — Владимир Чернышев, представляет его галерея Artwin (стенд В04). У нас с Владимиром за последнее время имелись точки соприкосновения и я была очень рада увидеть его работы вживую, впечатлили очень, безумно талантливый человек.
2. Работа Дарьи Денисовой «Пейзаж с источником света». Представляет ее Blessed Mess (стенд К05). Очень хорошие работы и в целом стенд привлека…
Всем привет, мои дорогие ценители прекрасного. Я думаю, многие знают, что вчера в Москве проходило превью самой масштабной ярмарки современного искусства в России — Cosmoscow, куда я также была приглашена. Я знаю, что о ней очень много уже было прочитано и сказано, но также хочу сделать свой обзор того, что мне понравилось. Разделила на две части, а также показала, что было куплено для моей коллекции. 🖼️🎨🎭🎨
1. DiDi …
Я так соскучилась по оплате телефоном, как в старые добрые времена, как вдруг Альфа-Банк дропнул это чудо. Лучший стикер, который можно представить.
Недавно я была на ярмарке современного искусства, приобрела новую чудесную работу (позади меня) и так торопилась, что оплачивая покупку, просто приложила телефон по старой памяти и о, чудо! Все сработало!
Потому что на моем телефоне теперь красуется универсальный супер…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @lizagysevskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Noisetier @thenoisetier · 33,125 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
juliadamon @juliadamonn · 32,541 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода @vrednayamoda · 188,661 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
aim_clo @aimclo_telegram · 37,829 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
мои маршруты @qaroutes · 35,305 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
диалектический отказ @istominakarina · 157,537 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Шелест Крис @shelest_kristina_v · 39,065 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
kuulesh • creative @kuulesh · 37,832 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
мысли о жизни | алина солопова @alinasinspiration · 31,083 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Схожу, пожалуй @shozhu · 37,068 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liza Gysevskaya” (@lizagysevskaya), 41,391 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lizagysevskaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
