Волгоградские компании выходят на внешние рынки: Казахстан, Беларусь, ОАЭ и Китай Волгоградские предприятия продолжают заявлять о себе за пределами региона. «Техносинтез» представляет продукцию на международной выставке «Нефть и газ» KIOGE 2026 в Казахстане. НПО «Броня» и «ОТК» участвуют в выставке «Иннопром» в Беларуси. С начала 2026 года уже 15 волгоградских компаний приняли участие в девяти зарубежных экспозици…

Channel
Сталингумрак
@volgograd_tg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,318subscribers
-632 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001165807423 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @volgograd_tg |
| Description | Вся правда о Волгоградской области @stalinkontakt - всегда читаю письма Перечень Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3FMzyM |
| Created | 11 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/volgograd_tg |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 45,318 | -57 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 45,375 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 45,384 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 45,399 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 45,406 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 45,421 | -20 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 45,441 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 45,455 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 45,460 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:28 | 45,466 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 45,470 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 45,481 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 45,484 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 45,486 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 45,491 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 45,499 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 45,500 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 45,502 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 45,507 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 45,513 | first reading |
Engagement
146 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.8%
- avg views ÷ 45,318 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,890
- 67 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 146 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (29 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 662,850 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,100
- Videos
- ≈396
- Links
- ≈2,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 17s
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.685%
- 1 of 146 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 9,640
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 9,640
- over 145 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvviFK2 | 1 | 28 September 2026 | 28 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
В Средней Ахтубе парашютист приземлился прямо на дорогу перед светофором Водители явно не ожидали такого развития событий. По всей видимости, прыжок совершался в авиаклубе «Юный Ястреб», который расположен неподалёку. Вполне возможно, что это был ученик — начинающий парашютист, который ещё только осваивает точность приземления. В такие моменты многое зависит от ветра и координации, и иногда «точка входа» оказывается…
Тишина, которая спасает жизни: призываем волгоградцев не обсуждать атаки беспилотников Сегодняшняя ночь выдалась громкой во многих районах. В результате атаки беспилотников в Красноармейском районе загорелась пятиэтажка на Удмуртской. Один человек госпитализирован, его жизни ничего не угрожает. Жильцов эвакуировали в ПВР. В периоды повышенной опасности информация становится оружием. И не всегда оно попадает в нужны…
🏗️В Комсомольском сквере Волгограда готовятся построить религиозный центр Градостроительный совет при мэрии одобрил эскизный проект, правда, с многочисленными замечаниями. Проект, напомним, предполагает строительство двух корпусов культурно-просветительского центра по обе стороны от существующего храма. Внутри — воскресная школа, библиотека, иконописная мастерская, выставочные и конференц-залы. Общественные обсужд…
Цена хайпа — скамья подсудимых: дело о деньгах в бассейне на Мамаевом кургане ушло в суд Двое мужчин, снимавших циничный ролик у мемориала «Стоять насмерть!», предстанут перед судом. 31-летний и 36-летний фигуранты обвиняются в осквернении мемориального комплекса. Напомним, 24 июля они бросили купюру в водоём, после чего один из них прыгнул в воду, чтобы достать деньги. Второй снимал всё это на телефон. Видео быст…
На «Волгоград Арене» можно бесплатно проверить здоровье: ЭКГ, УЗИ и онкоскрининг До завтра там проходит форум «Медицина и здравоохранение — 2026». Для специалистов — конференции и выставка, для жителей — «ФЕСТ здоровья», где можно пройти обследования и получить консультации врачей. Что доступно бесплатно: — ЭКГ и УЗИ щитовидной железы; — диагностика зрения и кожи; — экспресс-анализы; — мобильный комплекс «Донор» и …
«Наследники» идут в регионы: детские культурно-просветительские центры открылись в Волгоградской области Новые пространства для детей и молодёжи появились в музее-заповеднике «Старая Сарепта» в Волгограде и историко-краеведческом музее Камышина. Здесь оборудовали творческие и игровые зоны, художественные и гончарные мастерские, установили современное интерактивное оборудование. На площадках будут проводить мастер-к…
🗂️Очень тихо свое кресло покинул глава Дзержинского района Волгограда Сергей Таций, руководивший районом 11 лет, покинул пост без комментариев — просто попрощался с коллегами. А сегодня сотрудникам администрации представили нового руководителя. И это не менее интересно. Им стал 43-летний Илья Багров. Именно тот, который управлял компанией, освоивавшей сотни миллионов рублей на благоустройстве площади Павших Борцов.…
В Волгограде определили победителей «Семейной зарницы» Второй год подряд площадкой для решающих состязаний становится оборонно-спортивный лагерь «Авангард». Первое место заняла команда «Кирея» — семья Кирея из Псковской области. Серебро у «Воина Поволжья» — семьи Клоповых из Саратовской области. Бронзу завоевали «Родные сердца» — семья Щукиных из Астраханской области. В финале приняли участие более 400 человек — с…
Волгоградский суд отпустил Виталия Кошелева из СИЗО под домашний арест — следствие было против Речь идет о журналисте, обвиняемом в вымогательстве. Вместо СИЗО теперь — домашний арест до 23 октября. Кошелев был задержан в марте 2026 года. По версии следствия, вместе с коллегой Алексеем Серовым он вымогал 1 миллион 260 тысяч рублей у главврача одной из волгоградских поликлиник. Угрозы — публикация заведомо ложных св…
«Дулаг-205»: в Волгограде завершилась Вахта Памяти в бывшем лагере смерти Она проходила на месте немецкого пересыльного лагеря «Дулаг-205» в поселке Горьковский Советского района — одного из тех страшных мест, где в годы войны погибли тысячи советских военнопленных и мирных жителей. Поисковики обнаружили там останки 204 бойцов. Ученым предстоит провести генотипирование и, возможно, установить личности погибших. Над…
«Телеграмма Победы»: Волгоград передал привет Туле — городу-герою в честь 50-летие присвоения звания Акцию инициировал Всероссийский государственный университет юстиции. В ней приняли участие студенты и преподаватели вуза из Ростовского, Саратовского, Ставропольского и Северо-Кавказского филиалов, а также волгоградские школьники, несущие вахту на Посту №1. Участники передали символичную «Телеграмму Победы» — поздра…
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @volgograd_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@volgograd_tg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@polygraf34 · 2,310#1
@vpp34 · 811#2
@kolhoznystoroj · 1,504#3
@heroes34 · 4,072#4
@catgeneral · 2,565#5
@slushayte34 · 750#6
@rgn_34 · 10,411#7
@volgograd_24 · 7,085#8
@volgosluh · 3,855#9
@notdead34 · 2,073#10
@NovostiVLG · 26,473#11
@vpravdaru · 1,846#12
@ne_vecher · 2,329#13
@neshukar · 1,136#14
@newsv1 · 133,869#15
@pulvlg · 1,089#16
@oblvesti_ru · 2,521#17
@kp_volgograd · 2,388#18
@infoV102ru · 20,926#19
@yaroslavmalykh · 379#20
@duma_vgd · 525#21
@ervlg · 1,610#22
@bIoknot_vlg · 87,811#23
@reddep · 757#24
@volotskov · 3,806#25
@real_vlg · 2,082#26
@volgoduma · 1,772#27
@kommunalka134 · 1,916#28
@saygin_opinion · 5,701#29
@volgadmin · 11,841#30
@izbirkom34 · 2,092#31
@gorvesti · 1,396#32
@vashdozor · 6,009#33
@gasitel · 1,083#34
@volgo01 · 19,672#35
@sector134034 · 408#36
@riac_34 · 1,010#37
@volgograd_3_4 · 5,223#38
@po_volgogradski · 5,858#39
@maresievport · 215#40
@tsurvlg · 1,296#41
@volgograd2km · 308#42
@ghestvolgograd · 103,387#43
@sjr34 · 379#44
@zakonnosti_net · 177#45
@niktokromenas134 · 282#46
@Volgograd_media_chp · 368#47
@vol_gach · 3,379#48
@oblzdravvo · 2,891#49
@volgogradavto34 · 6,003#50
@mtv_vlg · 907#51
@vlgchp · 125,516#52
@voroninvlz · 2,828#53
@kalashnikov34 · 1,475#54
@tg_region34 · 653#55
@stranoved · 115,272#56
@gimbatov34 · 5,119#57
@avrygin · 144#58
@ecocentervlg · 2,203#59
@tnews_vlg · 1,755#60
@kpvlg · 294#61
@kharitonin · 180#62
@sredneahtubinskij · 909#63
@vlgkoroche · 50,659#64
@UlianovAV · 1,319#65
@volfoto · 786#66
@ritual_patrul · 1,434#67
@volgoproc_pravo · 2,684#68
@alinusyanews · 1,044#69
@beerriot · 679#70
@mobilizatsia34 · 14,391#71
@mchs_volgograd · 1,487#72
@nanna34 · 11,350#73
@poymamagazine · 6,410#74
@VOLG_34MVD · 7,202#75
@admvol_34 · 5,330#76
@vlgsud · 1,896#77
@srednyaya_akhtuba_today · 896#78
@sledkom_vlg · 2,187#79
@frol34 · 544#80
@tsarvolga · 3,599#81
@l34_news · 531#82
@VolzskyRu · 8,322#83
@ilov_admin · 563#84
@kotovorazvorot · 3,442#85
@openvlz_34 · 2,382#86
@exp_fdn · 3,302#87
@mnenevseravno_vlz · 647#88
@glava_ilov_admin · 496#89
@BudnikoV34 · 537 (as read 27 August 2026)#90
@kalachevpost · 11,909#91
@YashikPozora · 6,645#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@terrupr · 80,796
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@itiltg · 75,461
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
@Volgograd_krik · 18,220
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@besedki_nasedki · 61,024
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@blacklander · 48,916
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
@volgodrad_news · 28,247
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@kitchen_chef · 84,128
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@new_world_Z · 108,313
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@v9utra · 74,146
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@RusUnlimited · 105,926
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@Z_strana · 112,400
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@Volgograd_nov · 29,187
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@NovostiVLG · 26,473
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
@top_biz · 106,068
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@Ms_krasota · 63,539
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@explaining · 106,361
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сталингумрак” (@volgograd_tg), 45,318 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volgograd_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.