Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دکتر محمد دهقانی

Channel

دکتر محمد دهقانی

@dmdehghani

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,882subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001828423470
TypeChannel
Username@dmdehghani
Description💠 مورخ، نویسنده، منتقد، مترجم، ویراستار، استاد سابق دانشگاه‌های تهران و سمنان، عضو هیئت امنای کتابخانهٔ مجتبی مینوی 💠 ارتباط با استاد @maddehghani
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmdehghani

Growth

8,8768,8888,8826 August 2026 — 8,884 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,876 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,882 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,874–8,890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:268,882+6
9 Aug 2026, 23:418,876-12
6 Aug 2026, 13:528,888+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:038,884first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.8%
avg views ÷ 8,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,780
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.833%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (4 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total23,890
Reactions total199
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
409
Videos
60
Links
127

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23m 54s
Average length
23m 54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,833 reactions across 21 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
97953.4%
👍1779.66%
👌1598.67%
💔1307.09%
👏1136.16%
😭914.96%
👎733.98%
😢382.07%
❤‍🔥261.42%
🙏140.764%
🕊120.655%
😁50.273%
💯40.218%
🤡30.164%
🤬30.164%
🔥20.109%
😱20.109%
🌚10.055%
🌭10.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,833reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmdehghani. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,930 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r2gbyEg8NHE&t=134s&ra=m

17👎1

4 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈3,090 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @thehistoryofbeyhaqiPhoto

📜 ثبت‌نام دوره‌ی پنجم کارگاه بیهقی‌خوانی آغاز شد. با تدریس دکتر محمد دهقانی در این دوره، با تکیه بر کتاب «حدیث خداوندی و بندگی»، به تحلیل و خوانش تاریخ بیهقی خواهیم پرداخت؛ یکی از شاهکارهای نثر فارسی که جهان‌بینی، سیاست، و اخلاق را در قالبی فاخر و زنده روایت می‌کند. 🗓 چهارشنبه‌ها | ساعت ۱۸ تا ۱۹:۳۰ 🖥 ۱۰ جلسه آنلاین (۱۵ ساعت آموزش) 📍 برگزارشده در گوگل‌میت 🔔 شروع دوره: ۲۸ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 🎞️ امکان تهیهٔ دوره‌های گذشته را

30👏3👎2🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC≈8,040 views70 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

این هم نامه‌ای است که آیت‌الله شبیری زنجانی در سال ۱۳۳۷ و در ایام طلبگی خود به استاد مجتبی مینوی نوشته‌اند. نامه را به دو دلیل مهم یافتم و آن را برای انتشار در اختیار مجله‌ی وزین "آینه پژوهش" گذاشتم. اینجا می‌توانید هم متن نامه و هم توضیح مرا درباره‌ی آن ببینید.

28❤‍🔥26👍10🙏2🌚1👎1👏1😱1

27 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC≈5,010 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

چندی پیش اشاره‌ای داشتم به مقاله‌ی زنده‌یاد عباس اقبال درباره‌ی زبان ترکی در آذربایجان. نسخه‌ی pdf مقاله را به لطف یکی از دوستان به دست آوردم و اینجا تقدیم علاقه‌مندان کردم.

30👎4🙏3👍1

22 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC≈5,820 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @thehistoryofbeyhaqiPhoto

📚 کارگاه تاریخ جهانگشای جوینی 👤 با تدریس دکتر محمد دهقانی ▫️ آغاز دوره: ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ▫️ سه‌شنبه‌ها، ساعت ۱۸ تا ۱۹:۳۰ ▫️ ۸ جلسهٔ آنلاین در بستر گوگل میت ▫️ فیلم و فایل صوتی تمامی جلسات در اختیار شرکت‌کنندگان قرار می‌گیرد. 🌍 ثبت‌نام برای دوستان خارج از کشور پرداخت شهریه از طریق PayPal یا شمارهٔ IBAN امکان‌پذیر است. 💟 برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت‌نام، لطفاً از طریق دایرکت اینستاگرام یا تلگرام با نشانی @roodnevis_Sup

36👍1

17 Jul 2026, 04:25 UTC≈6,270 views155 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @bahmanshafa

عرفان خسروی: «امروز با چند نوجوان آشنا شدم. بحث‌‍مان درباره گذشته جهان بود. از مهبانگ صحبت کردیم ولی خیلی زود بحث کشیده شد به کباب. گفتم می‌دونید اسم کباب از کجا اومده؟ یکی به شوخی گفت شاید اسم یکی بابک بوده، برعکسش کردند، شده کباب. یکی دیگر باز به شوخی گفت از ریشه کبب اومده. گفتم احتمالا از سومری آمده است. پرسیدند سومر کجا بوده؟ چه زمانی بوده؟ چه زبانی داشتند؟ برایشان از زبان و فرهنگ سومری و الواح گلی گفتم. از چگونگ

97👏27👎12👌8👍6🕊5

16 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈4,540 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

چون این جلسه از خوانش تاریخ جهانگشا مناسبتی داشت با احوال امروزین ما اینجا آوردم:👇

15

16 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈4,310 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

فایل صوتی جلسهٔ هشتم دورهٔ سوم ۲۳ تیر ۰۵ #دکتر_محمد_دهقانی #تاریخ_جهانگشای_جوینی #رودنویس #بنیاد_زبان_و_فرهنگ_استکهلم

33👍5🙏4👏1

14 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈5,660 views108 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @shahnamehferdowsiii

🚫چرا نباید نسخه‌های غیرقانونی کتاب‌ها را منتشر یا دانلود کنیم؟ 🛑کتاب، تنها چند برگ کاغذ یا یک فایل PDF نیست؛ حاصل سال‌ها پژوهش، اندیشیدن، مطالعه و رنج نویسنده است. همان‌گونه که هیچ‌کس حق ندارد دارایی مادی دیگری را بدون اجازه بردارد، آثار فکری و ادبی نیز مالک دارند و قانون از آنها حمایت می‌کند. در ایران، قانون حمایت حقوق مؤلفان، مصنفان و هنرمندان مصوب ۱۳۴۸، حقوق مادی و معنوی پدیدآورندگان را به رسمیت شناخته است. بر

63👍34👎4🤡3👌2😁2

14 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC≈7,180 views190 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔴از رنجِ نوشتن تا غارتِ کتاب 📌برخی دوستان عزیز خبر دادند که نسخه‌ی pdf کتاب "حدیث خداوندی و بندگی" را کسی در همین تلگرام به رایگان در اختیار همگان نهاده است. تازه نام مؤلف را هم "محمد غلامی" نوشته‌اند، یعنی تنها هنرشان این بوده است که مرا از جایگاه دهقانی به مرتبه‌ی غلامی فرو آرند. همین جا اعلام می‌کنم که این کار به معنی دزدی در روز روشن است. پیش از این، چنین بلایی را بر سر کتاب‌های دیگرم هم آورده بودند و نه من توا

120👍28💔27😭9🤬3👏2😁1

13 Jul 2026, 04:05 UTC≈6,290 views64 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

دکتر ماشاءالله آجودانی را در ایران بیشتر به واسطه‌ی کتاب "مشروطه‌ی ایرانی‌"اش می‌شناسند که حاصل تحقیق و تأملی کم‌نظیر درباره‌ی نهضت مشروطه است، اما او پژوهشگری ارجمند در حوزه‌ی ادبیات معاصر ایران هم هست. کتاب "یا مرگ یا تجدد" او درباره‌ی ادبیات دوره‌ی مشروطه بارها در ایران تجدید چاپ شده و پرخواننده بوده است. یکی از کتاب‌های مهمی که دکتر آجودانی نوشته و در ایران متأسفانه هنوز مجال انتشار نیافته "هدایت، بوف کور و ناسیو

53👍4👏4🙏3

12 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈6,750 views108 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

هشداری هشتادساله در باب تجزیه‌طلبی زیر لوای زبان در ایران: امروز که در کتابخانه‌ی مینوی مجله‌ی یادگار را به مناسبتی ورق می‌زدم رسیدم به سرمقاله‌ای با عنوان "زبان ترکی در آذربایجان" که دانشمند زنده‌یاد، عباس اقبال، آن را در آبان‌ماه ۱۳۲۴ ذیل "مسائل روز" نوشته است و در آن از "جنبش مصنوعی‌"ای یاد کرده "که سلسله‌جنبانان آن خوشبختانه از چند تن مغرض تجاوز نمی‌کند و روح عامّه‌ی مردم از ایشان و از نهضت دروغینشان بیزار است [

👏4525👍18👎18👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dmdehghani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 75,073 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

زین قند پارسی - علیرضا حیدری
@qande_parsi · 14,985
8 posts
خردسرای فردوسی
@kheradsarayeferdowsi · 5,641
2 posts
کانال معاونین فناوری مدارس
@moavenha · 6,289
2 posts
اندیشه ی نو
@andisheh_new · 123
1 post
بلقیس‌ سلیمانی
@belgheissoleimani · 346
1 post
چراغداران
@Chraghdaran · 4,183
1 post
farnaz jafarzadegan فرنازجعفرزادگان
@frnzjafarzadegan · 272
1 post
باغ سبز مولانا / زهرا غریبیان
@gharibianlavasanii · 17,218
1 post
حافظ‌‌‌خوانی با محمدرضا کاکائی
@hafezaneha1 · 7,055
1 post
یافته‌های نوین روانشناختی
@Hrman11 · 22,669
1 post
نشریه پژوهی
@journal_cheshman · 44
1 post
kaveh farhadi کاوه فرهادی
@kaveh_farhadi · 2,249
1 post
نردبان آسمان
@nardebanasmaan · 789
1 post
نسرينه ها
@nasrineha · 116
1 post
سرو سخنگو (دکتر اسلامی نُدوشن)
@sarv_e_sokhangoo · 11,513
1 post
ستیغ
@Setiq · 2,770
1 post
اَشا - دوستداران شاهنامه البرز
@ShahnameAlborz · 2,245
1 post
شاهنامه برای کودکان و نوجوانان
@shahnameh_children · 3,269
1 post
شاهنامه کودک هما
@shahnameh_kodakan · 3,321
1 post
🪶انجمن شاهنامه‌خوانی هما (اشـه)
@shahnamehferdowsiii · 9,148
1 post
رازها و نمادها و آموزه‌های شاهنامه
@ShahnamehToosi · 9,087
1 post
ایرانشناسی
@shenasnameiran · 77
1 post
چهار خطی
@Xatt4 · 4,979
1 post
ییلاقِ متن
@yeilaqe_matn · 107
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دکتر محمد دهقانی” (@dmdehghani), 8,882 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmdehghani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.