Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net +259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,030–9,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 06:15
9,330
-1
12 Sept 2026, 07:01
9,331
-8
8 Sept 2026, 09:40
9,339
+111
2 Sept 2026, 20:34
9,228
+11
30 Aug 2026, 20:07
9,217
+8
28 Aug 2026, 00:33
9,209
+20
25 Aug 2026, 09:35
9,189
-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:32
9,190
+29
19 Aug 2026, 10:48
9,161
+5
16 Aug 2026, 17:52
9,156
+8
12 Aug 2026, 19:13
9,148
+19
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
9,129
+59
6 Aug 2026, 02:52
9,070
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:45
9,070
-1
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
9,071
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 9,330 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 July 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
1,450
Reactions total
50
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
538 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
330
61.3%
👍
52
9.67%
❤🔥
45
8.36%
👏
30
5.58%
💔
28
5.20%
👎
17
3.16%
🙏
16
2.97%
😢
6
1.12%
🔥
5
0.929%
🥰
3
0.558%
🕊
2
0.372%
🤔
2
0.372%
😁
1
0.186%
🤩
1
0.186%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مرگ حجّاج بن یوسف ثقفی*
چون پس از عمری جفای سهمناک
عاقبت حجّاجِ یوسف شد هلاک
رفت مردی بر درش پرسشکنان
گفت دربان: «رفت حجّاج از جهان»
مرد رفت و وقت دیگر بازگشت
باز دربان گفت: «حاکم درگذشت»
بار دیگر رفت مرد و باز هم
آمد و پرسید و دربان شد دژم
گفت: «تا کی گویمت؟ حجاج مرد»
گفت: «چی؟»، گفتا: «کری؟ او جان سپرد»
خسته شد دربان و گفت: «از این سؤال
چیست مقصودت؟ مگر خنگی؟ بنال!»
مرد گفت: «از مرگ او دارم خبر
لیک میپرسم …
کتاب، فقط مجموعهای از واژهها در میان دو جلد نیست؛ پنجرهایست به جهان اندیشه و فرصتی برای عمیقتر دیدن و بهتر زیستن. مطالعه به ما میآموزد مکث کنیم، بیندیشیم و برای فهمیدن، شتاب نکنیم. در روزگاری که فضای مجازی و اینستاگرام ذهن ما را از تصویری به تصویر دیگر میبرند، شاید بیش از همیشه به بازگشت به کتاب و مطالعه عمیق نیاز داریم.
باید کتابخانهها را دوباره پر کنیم؛ نه فقط قفسهها را، که صندلیها را. کتابخانه، پناهگاه ا…
مورخ قلم زن به تاریخ ایران
که این بوم و بر شیر بسیار دارد
نگون باد تختی که تاج و نگینش محمدعلیشاه قاجار دارد
بنازم به ایرانزمینی که خاکش
دلاور یلانی چو ستار دارد
بنازم به تبریز و آن ارض آذر
که دریادلانی چو سالار دارد
عکس: مبارزان مشروطه، تیر ماه سال ۱۲۸۸.
روزی که قوای سردار اسعد بختیاری، محمدولی خان تنکابنی و سپهدار اعظم، در نزدیکی تهران به هم رسیدند و تا سه روز برعلیه نیروهای استبداد مبارزه کردند تا سرانجام در …
🏛 ۱۴ مرداد ۱۲۸۵؛ سالروز صدور فرمان مشروطیت و پیروزی ارادهٔ ملت بر استبداد، گرامی باد.
فردا، چهاردهم مرداد، سالروز صدور فرمان مشروطیت در ایران است؛ رخدادی که به معنای دقیق کلمه یک «رویداد تاریخی» بود و پس از سدهها، یکی از اصیلترین و سرنوشتسازترین منازعات فکری ایران را پدید آورد: جدال میان سنت و تجدد، یا به تعبیری، میان «قدیم» و «جدید».
با این همه، به دلایل گوناگون، این جدال بنیادین کمتر مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. …
دکتر جلال متینی از شریفترین و فرهیختهترین انسانهایی است که تاکنون چشم روزگار به خود دیده است؛ مردی باوقار، متین، آدابدان و برخوردار از شخصیتی استوار و اندیشهای روشن.
اگر به سخنان دکتر غنینژاد درباره علی شریعتی وقعی نمینهید، به گمان من شایسته است دیدگاههای استاد دکتر جلال متینی را نیز در این زمینه بخوانید و با تأمل در آثار و گفتار او، از منظری دیگر به این موضوع بنگرید. ایشان از جمله پژوهشگرانی است که با استدلا…
به گمان من، سخنان دکتر غنینژاد، چنان چالشی پیش روی دیدگاههای دکتر عبدالکریم سروش نهاد که گویی آب در خوابگاه مورچگان ریخته باشد.
این آب، خوابِ زمستانیِ اهلِ جزم و جمود را برهم میزند و آنان را از زیر خروارها خاکِ عادت، سکون و یقینهای کهنه بیرون میکشد. سالها در پناه تاریکیِ لانههای خویش، جهان را همانگونه میخواستند که به آن خو گرفته بودند؛ بیتلاطم، بیپرسش و بیدگرگونی. اما کافی است قطرهای آب به این خوابگاه بر…
🏛 #چگونه_شاهنامه_بخوانیم؟
این نوشته برای دوستانی است که بهتازگی به جمع همراهان کانال پیوستهاند و هنوز با شیوهٔ کار ما آشنایی کامل ندارند.
🪶 در این کانال، شاهنامهٔ سترگ فردوسی را بر پایهٔ تصحیح استاد دکتر جلال خالقی مطلق میخوانیم؛ بیتبهبیت، با شرح واژگان، توضیح نکتههای ادبی، تاریخی و اسطورهای، تا خواندن این اثر بزرگ برای دوستداران آن آسانتر و دلنشینتر شود.
🪶 روی سخن ما در این نوشته با استادان و پژوهشگرا…
📣امروز
ساعت شش عصر
تبریز، خیابان ثقهالاسلام، کوچه سرخاب، بنیاد ایرانشناسی استان آذربایجان غربی
@shahnamehferdowsiii
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shahnamehferdowsiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@shahnamehferdowsiii edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,420 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪶انجمن شاهنامهخوانی هما (اشـه)” (@shahnamehferdowsiii), 9,330 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shahnamehferdowsiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
