Channel
@Setiq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,767subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001089156743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Setiq |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Setiq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,767 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 2,778 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 2,764 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 2,763 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 2,763 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (11 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,838 |
| Reactions total | 233 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 58.9% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 14.3% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 7.55% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 5.28% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.64% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 😴 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 1.51% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.13% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔅به فرهنگ باشد روان تندرست 🔸ایران سرزمینی است کهن، سرشار از نیکیها و مردمانی نجیب که ستایشگر داد و دانش و راستی و نکوهشگر ستم و دروغ و دشمنی بودهاند. باید از ایران گفت و نوشت. باید زبان فارسی، این سرمایۀ جاودان ایرانی را پاس داشت و برای گسترش آن دریغ نکرد. باید فرزندان کشور را با بزرگمهرها، فردوسیها و ابنسیناها آشنا کرد. اگر ایدۀ ایران به میان مردم و سیاستگذاران کشیده شود، امنیت و منافع ملی معنا میشود. ایران…
❤2🔥2
#چالش از دوستان خواهش میکنم مشارکت کنید سری به خودمان بزنیم ببینیم خودمان کجای نموداریم؟ خودِ من، هر چه سعی کردم، از این بیشتر نتوانستم آزادیخواه باشم. و از این بیشتر نتوانستم راستگرای اقتصادی باشم! ببینیم وقتی چپها را فحش میدهیم و میگوییم چپها ما را بدبخت کردند، و وقتی (کمابیش و با ترس و لرز و تا حدی که نه سیخ (شیش) بسوزد و نه کباب و خداینکرده مشکلی برایمان پیش نیاید!) تمامتخواهها را هم اندک نکوهشی می…
❤2👍1
https://t.me/booksStillAlive فرید حامد یکی از ثابتقدمترینها در این راه از حدود ده سال پیش در کانال تلگرامی کتاب گویا، هنرِ چندرسانه را به شعر و ادبیات و کتاب افزوده. و حالا با پروژهئی دیگر کتابهایی که هنوز زندهاند پادکستهایی برای معرفی و بررسی کتابهای ماندگار در YouTube هم هست هر کدام از ما ممکن است نامِ کتابهایی را شنیدهباشیم و پیش از خواندنِ آن بخواهیم چیزی در بارهاش بدانیم یا ممکن است کتابی را خوا…
❤5👏2👍1
منـــــده سیــغار ایکی جهان، من بو جهانه سیغمازام گوهرِ لامــکان منم، کــــون و مکانه سیغمازام عرش ایله فرش و کاف و نون، منده بولوندو جمله چون کس سؤزونو اوزاتما کیم شرح و بیانه سیغمازام کار مشترک کانال تلگرامی #نسیمی_مکتبی و #فضولی_موزیک 🆔️@FizuliMusics 🆔️@nasimi771 🆔️@sahateshgh 🆔️@hekim_fuzuli
❤9
دلِ ضعیفم از آن میکَشد به طرْفِ چمن که جان زِ مرگ به بیماریِ صبا بِبَرَد #حافظ بیمار بودنِ صبا را میدانم. بادی شُل و ضعیف است. مانندِ بیماران که بیحال اند. صبا را در این صفت به بیماری مانند کرده. دل به چیزی کشیدن را هم میدانم. اشتیاق و کشش به چیزی داشتن. چیزی را دلِ آدم میخواهد. جان از مرگ بردن را هم. کسی که رو به موت است، وقتی نجات بیابد و جان بهدر ببَرَد. به چیزی جان از مرگ بردن: به واسطهی چیزی یا بهوسی…
👍14👎6❤4👏1😁1
هوپ هوپ نامه میرزا علیاکبر صابر به یادِ پدرم در سالروزِ درگذشتِ او بیشترِ شعرهای این کتاب را ازبر بود و به اقتضای موضوعِ صحبتِ جمع، گهگاه یکی از آنها را می خواند. و هر بار هم از ذکرِ نکتهئی از شعر مشعوف میشد؛ و هر بار شباهتِ اوضاعِ روزگارِ میرزا علی اکبر صابر با روزگارِ ما را بازگو میکرد. سهیل قاسمی @Setiq
❤12👍5🔥2
به یادِ پدرم علی قاسمی ۴ خرداد ۱۳۱۳ ۳ مرداد ۱۳۸۹ بخشی از فیلمِ موزیکالِ ساتیریکِ «اُ اُلماسون بو اُلسون» یا «مشهدی عباد» است که در آن، «میرزا علی اکبر صابر» شاعر، شعری میخوانَد. یادم است روی صندلیِ نزدیک به تلویزیون که یک میزِ کوچک جلوی آن از چوبِ «سُر» بود مینشست. کاغذِ کوچک و خودکاری هم بود که وقتی تلویزیون باکو برنامهها را اعلام میکرد، ساعت و عنوانِ آنهایی که دوست داشت را یادداشت میکرد. خطِّ خوبی هم داشت…
❤41🕊7
در بارهی شعرِ «در آستانه» گفتم احمد شاملو ۱۳۰۴ - ۱۳۷۹ دالانِ تنگی را که درنوشتهام به وداع فراپُشت مینگرم: فرصت کوتاه بود و سفر جانکاه بود اما یگانه بود و هیچ کم نداشت. به جان منت پذیرم و حق گزارم! (چنین گفت بامدادِ خسته.) سهیل قاسمی دوم امرداد ۱۴۰۵ @Setiq
👍5👎3👏2
فرصت کوتاه بود و سفر جانکاه بود اما یگانه بود و هیچ کم نداشت. به جان منت پذیرم و حق گزارم! (چنین گفت بامدادِ خسته.) باید اِستاد و فرود آمد بر آستانِ دری که کوبه ندارد، چرا که اگر بهگاه آمدهباشی دربان به انتظارِ توست و اگر بیگاه به درکوفتنات پاسخی نمیآید. کوتاه است در، پس آن به که فروتن باشی. آیینهیی نیکپرداخته توانی بود آنجا تا آراستگی را پیش از درآمدن در خود نظری کنی هرچند که غلغلهی آن سوی در زادهی ت…
❤12👎5
ستیغ pinned a file
دگرباره بشوریدم بدان سانم به جان تو که هر بندی که بربندی بدرانم به جان تو من آن دیوانه بندم که دیوان را همی بندم زبان مرغ میدانم سلیمانم به جان تو نخواهم عمر فانی را توی عمر عزیز من نخواهم جان پرغم را توی جانم به جان تو چو تو پنهان شوی از من همه تاریکی و کفرم چو تو پیدا شوی بر من مسلمانم به جان تو گر آبی خوردم از کوزه خیال تو در او دیدم وگر یک دم زدم بیتو پشیمانم به جان تو اگر بیتو بر افلاکم چو ابر تیره غمناک…
❤17👍3👎3🥰1
زبان فارسی نیز مانندِ زبانهای دیگر از حروفِ صدادار و بیصدا (مصوّت و صامت) تشکیل شدهاست. صدادارها (مصوّتها) به دو دستهی کوتاه و بلند تقسیم شدهاست. در الفبایی که با آن مینویسیم، نشانههای حروفِ صدا دارِ بلند «ا، و، ی» به شکلِ حرفی مستقل نگاشته میشود امّا نشانههای حروفِ صدادارِ کوتاه، بهشکلِ نشانه (حرکت) بر بالا یا پایینِ حرفِ بیصدایِ پیشینِ آن نشان داده میشود. حال آنکه در زبانهایی که با الفبای لاتین نوشته…
👏7❤4👎2🤔2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Setiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 38,874 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ستیغ” (@Setiq), 2,767 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Setiq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.