Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Страсть знания

@philosophero

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,085subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001593621221
TypeChannel
Username@philosophero
Created31 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/philosophero

Growth

2,0682,0852,076.56 August 2026 — 2,068 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,068 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,085 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,065–2,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:132,085+17
6 Aug 2026, 06:192,068no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:362,068first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 2,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
689
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (19 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,270
Reactions total170
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

316 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17354.7%
🔥4213.3%
❤‍🔥268.23%
😢175.38%
🕊123.80%
🥰123.80%
👍92.85%
😁72.22%
👏61.90%
🤔41.27%
🏆30.949%
20.633%
🌚20.633%
👨‍💻10.316%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Марк Фишер и Темный Поворот Почему Марк Фишер избежал Темного Поворота? Таким вопросом задался один автор в тематическом тгк, анонсируя курс у себя, за что ему большое спасибо. Философы, да и вообще интеллектуалы, представляются многим людьми свободы. По крайней мере, именно так нас приучила видеть подобные фигуры русская литература XIX века. Внутри этого сеттинга интеллектуалы, как правило, оказываются противоп

11🔥4🌚1🤔1

Signed Андрей Денисов

3 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC410 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Редакция обращает внимание А завтра в Петербурге одно из первых мероприятий проводит «Музей бомжей». Я с удивлением узнал, что до того в Петербурге не было такого музея, хотя в городе давшем нам «Ночлежку», и вообще, где очевидно есть особенный статус бездомных — такой давно пора было иметь. У любого петербуржца есть история о том, как где-то между Лиговкой и Обводным, или на Гаванской , в промзонах за Выборгской

51😢1

Signed Андрей Денисов

3 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC437 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @muzei_bomzheiPhoto

Бездомные гении: метафизика питерских углов и московских коммуналок у Гоголя и Булгакова Два города, две эпохи и один вечный квартирный вопрос. На лекции журналиста Анастасии Медвецкой вы узнаете, как Николай Гоголь и Михаил Булгаков превратили обычное жилье в мистическую ловушку для своих героев. Задумывались ли вы, почему Гоголь, который сам панически боялся замкнутых пространств, заставлял своих персонажей ютить

🔥3🕊1

Signed Андрей Денисов

1 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,030 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почти запоздалые анонсы Завтра в час с Борей Клюшниковым обсуждаем Марка Фишера, займемся неприкрытой фишерофилией. Обсудим недавно переведенную мной «Белую магию». Должно быть очень душевно! Ссылка будет на канале Бори.

10

Signed Андрей Денисов

1 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC503 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kursBorya

В воскресенье в час по Парижу будет стрим с Андреем Денисовым по Марку Фишеру!

8

Signed Андрей Денисов

30 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC692 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какой же Джеймисон крутой Последние пару недель я время от времени возвращаюсь к «Годам теории» Фредрика Джеймисона, прерывая фишеровские студии. Получаю огромное удовольствие от самого способа изложения, точнее, от записанных во время ковида семинаров, сохранивших живую интонацию мысли и постоянную рефлексию над ситуацией говорения. Джеймисон реконструирует французскую теорию как интеллектуальную традицию, истори

23🥰3🔥2😁2❤‍🔥1🌚1

Signed Андрей Денисов

26 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC576 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @structurestrikesback

В понедельник в 21 по МСК товарищ Сюткин будет спорить с Есениным русской философии: нужно ли сражаться за Абсолют или лучше просто ненапряжно чиллить. А я буду модерировать мероприятие. Ждем ваших вопросов! https://youtube.com/live/QqIzj6SVh4Y

11🕊1

Signed Андрей Денисов

26 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC618 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы на передаче «Большие головы» Завтра буду на стриме Сюткин/Герасимов обсуждать проблемы философии как интертеймента: альтернатива ли это позднекапиалистическому досугу или его продолжение иными средствами. Также думаю обсудим феномен интернет-философии, курсы и где пролегает грань между эксплейнером и мышлением. Можно ли стремиться к истине, если лицо очень серьезное и тому подобное!

🔥13

Signed Андрей Денисов

25 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC636 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Преодолевая либидинальный ригоризм Обсуждая на занятии текст Марка Фишера о Joy Division из «Призраков моей жизни», мы довольно быстро перешли от самой группы к вопросу о том, имеет ли Фишер право “так свободно пользоваться психоаналитическими терминами”. Особенно всех, как обычно, заинтересовало либидо. Фишер пишет, что Joy Division удалили из рока его либидинальный мотор и так мы получили из панка постпанк, исток

11🔥4🥰2

Signed Андрей Денисов

19 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC805 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Марк Фишер в поисках отсутствующего времени В «Белой магии» Марк Фишер обращается к понятию пикнолепсии, заимствованному у Поля Вирильо. В начале «Эстетики исчезновения» Вирильо описывает краткие провалы сознательного присутствия, во время которых человек физически остаётся на месте, продолжает видеть и слышать, однако не включает происходящее в собственный опыт. Через несколько секунд сознание возвращается и соед

14🔥4

Signed Андрей Денисов

16 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC721 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Примечание переводчика к раннему тексту Марка Фишера Вокруг Марка Фишера постепенно складывается канон любимого мыслителя, выражающего скучающую и почти внепоколенческую тоску по универсализму. Наш «миллениальский слоняра» выступал против постмодернизма во всех его проявлениях, критиковал политику идентичности, писал о депрессии, утрате будущего и невозможности представить иной относительно либеральной рыночный общ

11👍1🔥1

Signed Андрей Денисов

15 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC712 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё и под ужасный комментарий Шнякина It happened again, it happened again 🥲 Football isn’t coming home It happened again, it happened again 🥲 Football isn’t coming home Харри Кейн снял проклятие с себя, но со сборной не сумел( Болеть за Англию даже по-своему больнее, чем за все остальные, даже если твоя сборная просто снята со всех турниров.

😢14🕊5

Signed Андрей Денисов

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @philosophero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 29,230 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Страсть знания” (@philosophero), 2,085 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philosophero.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.