Добро пожаловать в официальный канал венчурного фонда DAO KONDR VC! Мы инвестируем в криптопроекты будущего.
https://kondr.io
По вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества пишите, пожалуйста:
+7-911-235-88-57 Елена
Telegram : https://t.me/lenkochka
Created
15 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,412–26,548 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:05
26,428
-8
16 Aug 2026, 03:47
26,436
-16
14 Aug 2026, 16:13
26,452
-9
13 Aug 2026, 07:54
26,461
-9
12 Aug 2026, 07:52
26,470
-4
11 Aug 2026, 09:17
26,474
-11
10 Aug 2026, 08:50
26,485
-11
9 Aug 2026, 11:52
26,496
-9
8 Aug 2026, 13:12
26,505
-14
7 Aug 2026, 15:25
26,519
-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:30
26,525
-7
6 Aug 2026, 07:15
26,532
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:09
26,532
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,650
Videos
≈338
Links
≈1,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
184 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
77
41.8%
😁
29
15.8%
❤
28
15.2%
🔥
23
12.5%
🤔
18
9.78%
👏
7
3.80%
🎉
1
0.543%
🥰
1
0.543%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сибирский сбор сейчас, наверное, самый любимый чай у меня дома.
Особенно в холодную погоду или после длинного дня.
У него очень глубокий вкус. Без ощущения “ароматизатора”. Просто нормальный, насыщенный чай с характером.
Там иван-чай, травы, ягоды. Причём ягоды у нас не обычной сушки. Из них аккуратно убирается влага азотом, поэтому вкус остаётся более живым и настоящим.
Я обычно пью его утром или днём. После нег…
Новый выпуск на YouTube!
В этот раз показал наш выезд в зимний лес с палаткой размером с ДОМ! Не обошлось и без бани – в этот раз поставили ее на ЛЬДУ:
https://youtu.be/6BvF8LwBox4
Новый выпуск на YouTube! Снял честный обзор моего нового V-class: плюсы, минусы и мои выводы – стоит ли покупать такой автомобиль? А также рассказываю про ошибку, которая могла мне стоит 300 000 рублей!
https://youtu.be/5VvmHttfrx0
Новый выпуск! В этот раз устроил испытание новому пикапу Foton Tunland G9 – ночевал в нем в лесу, а также проверил рабочие лайфхаки по выживанию! Выпуск получился очень интересным🔥
Смотреть Вконтакте
Смотреть Rutube
Смотреть Дзен
Сейчас странное время Многие проекты просто рушатся
Я тоже попал в непростую ситуацию И в какой то момент понял Нужно делать что то настоящее
У меня трое детей И ответственность совсем другая
Я уже несколько лет не пью алкоголь И каждый день пью чай
Нормальный сбор Без мусора Просто вкусный чай
Сначала делал для себя Потом начал угощать друзей
И почти все начали говорить Слушай продай
Так и появился мой бренд чая
Без…
🔥 Новый выпуск на YouTube про стройку дома в ипотеку!
В этот раз — установка септика:
рассказал, какой выбрали, почему именно его, и показал весь процесс монтажа.
И да… во время работ мы нашли ЗОЛОТО 😅
Смотрите выпуск:
https://youtu.be/_o9wb77ruZU
Два года назад я взял ипотеку, чтобы построить дом и продать. Застройщик обанкротился, дом остался не достроенным и в итоге его пришлось снести. При этом по условиям ипотеки, если я его сейчас не дострою, то ежемесячный платеж пересчитают по текущей ставке – это примерно 250 000 ₽ в месяц.
Я в жестком минусе, но решил построить дом заново. В этом выпуске рассказываю о том, как мне удалось увеличить стоимость будущег…
😁6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daokondrvcru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 28 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 896,490 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DAO KONDR VC - Биткоин / криптовалюта / блокчейн” (@daokondrvcru), 26,428 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daokondrvcru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.