📲 ¿Y QUÉ TE VAS A ENCONTRAR DENTRO? Pronósticos, análisis, diferentes deportes y seguimiento de resultados. Hoy no te lo tenemos que contar... puedes verlo tú mismo! https://t.me/+RuTRWmTi7JQ5MDg0 👈 https://t.me/+RuTRWmTi7JQ5MDg0 👈 https://t.me/+RuTRWmTi7JQ5MDg0 👈 👆 Acceso abierto arriba.

Channel
💡CURIOSAMENTE🧠
@curiosamenteee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,203subscribers
-466 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001366167204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curiosamenteee |
| Description | 💡 【Ú】【N】【E】【T】【E】 💡 Entérate de cientos de curiosidades sobre el mundo🌏 📚Aprende un poco más cada día 📚 Qué tiene de nuevo: 🌟| Top 10 Curiosidades 🌟| Encuestas interactivas Propiedad @Proyecto_Valkyria Publicidad: @DavidV97 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curiosamenteee |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 23,203 | -70 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 23,273 | -29 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 23,302 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 23,324 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 23,342 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 23,353 | -28 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 23,381 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 23,403 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 23,420 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:27 | 23,412 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 23,429 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 23,443 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 23,454 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 23,458 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 23,460 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 23,468 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 23,481 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 23,492 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 23,514 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 23,529 | first reading |
Engagement
184 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.37%
- avg views ÷ 23,203 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 549
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.20%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 184 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 184 (2 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,346 |
| Reactions total | 280 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,560
- Videos
- ≈5
- Links
- ≈21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,530 reactions across 167 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😱 | 412 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 270 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 255 | 16.7% | |
| 🤯 | 156 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 143 | 9.35% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 2.75% | |
| 👌 | 31 | 2.03% | |
| ✍ | 30 | 1.96% | |
| 😢 | 29 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 1.76% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 1.76% | |
| 🥴 | 20 | 1.31% | |
| 🤨 | 11 | 0.719% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 0.719% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 0.654% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 0.588% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 0.523% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 🤷♂ | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 0.327% | |
| 11 further kinds | 20 | 1.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 184 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,567 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔎 NO HACE FALTA QUE NOS CREAS Mira lo que publicamos antes de los partidos. Vuelve cuando terminen y comprueba qué ocurrió ;) https://t.me/+RuTRWmTi7JQ5MDg0 👈 ➡️ ¡ACCESO GRATUITO AQUÍ! 🖱 Hoy puedes verlo tú mismo desde dentro!
En Asia se cree que un gato negro trae la felicidad.
❤1😱1
¡DESCUBRE EL MUNDO COMO NUNCA LO IMAGINASTE! ¿Crees tenerlo todo claro? 🌌 Prepárate para datos increíbles que cambiarán tu perspectiva. Explora las maravillas ocultas del universo, sorprende a todos y diviértete aprendiendo. ¡Únete a ¿YA LO SABÍAS? y descubre lo imposible! 🚀
Un precioso ejemplar de arma blanca llamado «Perla de Oriente», fabricado por el maestro armero Baster Varenski, se ha convertido en uno de los cuchillos más caros del mundo. Su valor es de $2,1 millones.
😱3
En el periodo de 1814 a 1830, la bandera francesa era un lienzo blanco puro.
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
El famoso Cirque du Soleil se niega fundamentalmente a utilizar animales en sus espectáculos. Sus números son una mezcla de acrobacia y música mágica. Se considera que ha insuflado una nueva vida al arte circense. Los ingresos anuales del circo superan los 600 millones de dólares.
❤6😱3
Un estudio revela que vivir en un lugar desde donde se puede ver el océano puede reducir el estrés psicológico porque contemplar el color azul tiene un efecto calmante. Los hallazgos no se ven afectados por la edad, los ingresos ni el vecindario.
🥰5
Los emperadores romanos tenían la tradición de ingerir diariamente mitridato, una pequeña cantidad de veneno. Intentaban aumentar su inmunidad para que nadie los envenenara.
🤯10💊2
😳 La religión principal en la Antártida es el cristianismo, con un total de ocho iglesias . De hecho, algunos de estos edificios están protegidos como monumentos históricos.
🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @curiosamenteee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@todosloscanalestelegram · 76,12118 posts🇵🇪 Grupos Peruanos 🇵🇪
@gruposycanalesperuanos · 7,2915 posts🔰Directorio de WhatsApp 💬
@Directorio_de_WhatsApp · 9,2774 postsCanales Cuba ®
@canales_cu · 6,3213 postsGrupos Cuba ®
@grupos_cu · 6,6072 postsBots Cuba ®
@bots_cu · 1,2841 post💱 CRIPTOMEMES 😂
@cripto_meme · 1,1051 postDIRECTORIO PERUANO
@DirectorioPeruano · 4801 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sabiasque · 37,857#1
@curiosidadesss · 50,815#2
@buzzhistoria · 75,245#3
@UnDatoViral · 21,930#4
@sabiasqueoficial · 37,841#5
@UnDatoCurioso · 19,512#6
@DatosCuriosos · 31,978#7
@buzzdatos · 120,871#8
@undiacomo · 29,435#9
@Curiosa_Senal · 34,022#10
@AstronomiayCiencia · 15,190#11
@cienciaparatodos · 20,698#12
@VidaSaludableTips · 13,943#13
@Biologia_Naturaleza · 20,272#14
@HistoriayArqueologia · 27,437#15
@FotosImpactantes · 15,963#16
@hayqverlo · 23,940#17
@lasaludmental · 9,677#18
@Geografia_Ciencia · 10,050#19
@Historiasenblancoynegro · 18,840#20
@Mentes_Siniestrass · 9,896#21
@Curiosisimo · 18,797#22
@ElNudo · 3,697#23
@buzzquizzes · 22,849#24
@Mundo_Fitness · 23,362#25
@EscribiendoFrases · 18,367#26
@SenalesDelEspacio · 18,252#27
@Nutri_Tips · 20,215#28
@cuerpo_mente · 13,897#29
@buzzcitas · 63,217#30
@cientifico · 7,104#31
@VotaYa · 2,378#32
@rollo_chino · 27,730#33
@genialyjovial · 6,357#34
@memesfrases · 5,225#35
@xromosoma_extra · 31,648#36
@sabiasquetop · 2,349#37
@buena_noticia · 3,197#38
@xataka · 49,221#39
@SonataLife · 11,182#40
@atraccionmental · 26,387#41
@PuroSarcasmoo · 14,810#42
@SoyuzHistoria · 75#43
@Imageneshistoricas · 24,699#44
@Nerdo_Gram · 7,775#45
@ladrido · 8,365#46
@LaVidaEsSonido · 17,957#47
@muycomputer · 9,227#48
@Panorama_Mundial · 10,249#49
@memegracioso · 10,574#50
@venez · 72,199#51
@Luces_Camara · 5,805#52
@Para_reir · 9,714#53
@TuHoroscopoOficial · 5,554#54
@GeneracionIA · 13,005#55
@DepreEconomica · 20,607#56
@loving_telandroid · 2,192#57
@Avance_Tecnologico · 2,362#58
@memesltn · 34,493#59
@elOJOen · 84,926#60
@Imagenespoeticas · 12,115#61
@WallpapersFreeHD · 14,883#62
@Diccionarioletras · 24,204#63
@trivialmentesabio · 1,109#64
@MemesTgm · 7,206#65
@mundodefrases · 14,394#66
@MemesClubXD · 8,712#67
@stickerslocos · 12,341#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DatosCuriosos · 31,978
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
@Biologia_Naturaleza · 20,272
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026
@UnDatoViral · 21,930
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
@Mundo_Fitness · 23,362
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026
@Nutri_Tips · 20,215
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 September 2026
@cienciaparatodos · 20,698
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 September 2026
@atraccionmental · 26,387
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
@HistoriayArqueologia · 27,437
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
@Aprende_English · 21,084
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 24 September 2026
@Imageneshistoricas · 24,699
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
@Diccionarioletras · 24,204
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💡CURIOSAMENTE🧠” (@curiosamenteee), 23,203 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curiosamenteee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.