Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mentes Siniestras 🧠🔪

Channel

Mentes Siniestras 🧠🔪

@Mentes_Siniestrass

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,878subscribers

+159 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466603157
TypeChannel
Username@Mentes_Siniestrass
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mentes_Siniestrass

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,7049,8789,7916 August 2026 — 9,719 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,719 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,720 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,711 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,704 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,720 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,729 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,724 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,809 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,793 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,782 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,773 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,847 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,830 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,878 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net +159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,678–9,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:169,878+48
11 Sept 2026, 17:599,830-17
6 Sept 2026, 20:419,847+74
2 Sept 2026, 16:179,773-9
30 Aug 2026, 13:449,782-11
27 Aug 2026, 05:289,793-16
24 Aug 2026, 11:279,809+85
21 Aug 2026, 02:149,724-5
18 Aug 2026, 12:359,729+9
15 Aug 2026, 02:149,720+16
11 Aug 2026, 20:379,704-7
9 Aug 2026, 03:529,711-9
6 Aug 2026, 10:509,720+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:499,719no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:479,719first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.22%
avg views ÷ 9,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
713
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held88 (27 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total27,824
Reactions total1,096
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 51s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,959 reactions across 85 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱80027.0%
🤯39413.3%
😢38613.0%
😡32410.9%
👍2889.73%
2177.33%
😨1755.91%
👏1585.34%
🔥551.86%
💔441.49%
😁260.879%
😭250.845%
👀200.676%
🙏140.473%
🐳60.203%
50.169%
💊50.169%
🤩50.169%
👻30.101%
🥰30.101%
5 further kinds60.203%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,017 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 87 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mentes_Siniestrass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC3 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

La primera película de terror de la historia es "Le Manoir du diable" estrenada en Francia el 24 de diciembre de 1896. Para lograr sus efectos, como por ejemplo la transformación del murciélago en demonio, Méliès utilizó una técnica de edición llamada sustitución, que para la época era completamente revolucionaria. Aunque su intención inicial era más asombrar que aterrorizar, su temática (demonios, esqueletos y un

👏1

29 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC205 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Cubierta de lodo, en shock y aferrada a lo poco que pudo conservar. Así fue encontrada esta mujer tras ser rescatada en Nepal. @mentes_siniestrass

😢12🤯53😭1

28 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC360 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Indignación por un video en el que una madre golpea a su hijo. Un video que se viralizó en TikTok generó indignación en redes sociales. Según trascendió, el padre del menor realizó una denuncia y la mujer fue detenida. @mentes_siniestrass

😡27

28 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC437 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

La tumba de Antoine Michel Vemere, comerciante y pirata, cementerio de Assenbrouck, Brujas, Bélgica. 1837. @mentes_siniestrass

😱15🔥5😁1

28 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC483 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Los asesinatos de Erdnington: Dos casos similares con 157 años de diferencia. Mary Ashford y Bárbara Forrest, ambas de 20 años, compartían las mismas fechas de nacimiento. Las dos fueron violadas y luego estranguladas hasta la muerte el 27 de mayo, pero con 157 años de diferencia. En las últimas horas de sus vidas, ambas mujeres fueron a un baile, fueron asesinadas en el Pype Hayes Park de Inglaterra y los sospecho

🤯14😨6

28 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC469 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @MMaravillosooPhoto

⚡️Bienvenidos a Mundo🌍Maravilloso un lugar especial que no querrá perderse. Únase al mejor canal de todo telegram, participe con nosotros y forme parte de nuestra familia contamos con innumerables actividades grupales 📱 🏓Juegos interactivos 🪀 📺4 imágenes una palabra 🚀Fárragos 📌Completa la frase 📌Quices 🚀Test de rápidez 📌Adivina el emojis 🔍Curiosidades 🤫Memes 🎮Bot de juegos🏀🏓🏹🛼⛷🥋🥅

👍5

28 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC514 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

El "Doctor Muerte" considerado el asesino en serie con mayor número de víctimas directas confirmadas. El mundo de la medicina recibió un duro golpe a comienzos de este milenio cuando se determinó que Harold Shipman, un médico de familia inglés que contaba con la confianza de sus pacientes, era culpable de la muerte al menos de 215 de ellos. La mayor parte de las víctimas de Shipman eran mujeres mayores, con buena s

🔥13😱8👍21😡1

28 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC555 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Una cámara de seguridad registró en Yoloaiquín, Morazán, el impacto de una motocicleta contra un automóvil que se estacionaba. La moto salió proyectada y golpeó a un peatón, dejando lesionados a los involucrados. @mentes_siniestrass

😡161

28 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC671 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Ataque armado en Guayaquil provoca tres muertos y dos heridos. Un grupo de personas que participaba de un cortejo fúnebre fue atacado a tiros en los exteriores de un cementerio en Ecuador. @mentes_siniestrass

😱21

28 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTC684 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

San Francisco. 1964. @mentes_siniestrass

🤯18👍9

27 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC732 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Megan Huntsman: La madre asesina El caso de esta mujer de 39 años se hizo famoso mundialmente por la brutalidad del asesinato. En 2014 Huntsman fue detenida por haber matado a sangre fría a 6 de sus hijos recien nacidos luego de cada parto. Los bebés nacieron entre 1996 y 2006; y tras cada asesinato, la mujer guardó los cuerpos en cajas en el garaje de su casa. Huntsman fue condenada en 2015 a 20 años de cárcel sin

😡23😱5🥰1😈1

27 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC735 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Un anciano se desploma de forma súbita en una calle. Un hombre que pasaba caminando lo presenció y luego evitó tocarlo y llamó de inmediato a emergencias. Las cámaras de vigilancia grabaron la caída y los servicios de emergencia acudieron a atenderlo. @mentes_siniestrass

🤯21👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @Mentes_Siniestrass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Mentes_Siniestrass edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTCAnonymous Poll430 voters

¿A qué le temes más? 😔

  1. La muerte 🌟28%
  2. La soledad 😔14%
  3. La oscuridad ✋8%
  4. El fracaso 📉38%
  5. El rechazo 🤚11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTCAnonymous Poll319 voters

¿Qué saga de terror te gusta más? 🤩

  1. The Conjuring (Expediente Warren)38%
  2. Viernes 1317%
  3. Saw29%
  4. Scream6%
  5. Alien22%
  6. Otra9%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crónica Policial
@cronicaspoliciales · 86,498
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Cosas que no sabías💡
@curiosidadesss · 50,815
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Sabias que?
@sabiasqueoficial · 37,903
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Actualidad Oscura
@actualidadoscura · 104,785
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 4 September 2026
💡CURIOSAMENTE🧠
@curiosamenteee · 23,273
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
Enigmas y misterios del mundo
@ConspiracionESP · 30,912
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Buzz💡 Datos interesantes
@buzzdatos · 121,234
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Buzz 📚 Historia
@buzzhistoria · 75,512
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
VEHICULAR CAOS
@vehicularcaos · 23,146
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
¡Hay que verlo!
@hayqverlo · 24,050
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
🗽 PERLAS ESCONDIDAS ⌛️
@Imageneshistoricas · 24,772
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
La señal curiosa
@Curiosa_Senal · 34,022
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
📚 DATOS CURIOSOS 🔍
@DatosCuriosos · 32,044
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Un día como hoy
@undiacomo · 29,559
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
🏛 CARRUSEL POR LA HISTORIA 🗿
@HistoriayArqueologia · 27,437
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
UN DATO VIRAL
@UnDatoViral · 22,054
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
XROMOSOMA EXTRA
@xromosoma_extra · 31,648
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
Soyuz 📚 Historia
@SoyuzHistoria · 57,717
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Buzz 👨‍🏫 Quiz
@buzzquizzes · 22,972
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Sabias que?
@sabiasque · 160,545
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Risas, Memes y Chistes 🤣
@bromas · 29,860
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
Buzz 💬 Citas
@buzzcitas · 63,217
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
ROLLO CHINO
@rollo_chino · 27,730
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mentes Siniestras 🧠🔪” (@Mentes_Siniestrass), 9,878 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mentes_Siniestrass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.