Tecnología, Ciberseguridad, Privacidad, Redes Sociales, Derecho de las TIC y mucho más. Todo con un toque jurista...
Contacto: @ddradmin
DerechodelaRed.com
Created
25 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,656–15,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 18:57
15,661
+4
12 Aug 2026, 11:06
15,657
-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:58
15,660
-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:52
15,661
-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:11
15,664
-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:22
15,667
+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:56
15,666
+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
15,665
no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:36
15,665
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 15,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,960
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.537%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
20 (21 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
26,610
Reactions total
143
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈574
Videos
≈19
Links
≈4,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤔
65
22.0%
❤
50
16.9%
🔥
45
15.3%
👍
44
14.9%
👏
38
12.9%
🤬
20
6.78%
🤮
19
6.44%
😱
8
2.71%
🤯
3
1.02%
🤩
2
0.678%
🎉
1
0.339%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▶️ Cientos de conversaciones compartidas de Claude aparecieron indexadas en Google
Cómo revisar y revocar tus propios enlaces compartidos.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/28/conversaciones-compartidas-de-claude-aparecen-indexadas-en-google/
📝”Prismas: por qué ya no vivimos el momento, solo lo grabamos”
No son las pantallas ni los móviles: son los prismas invisibles a través de los que hemos empezado a interpretar la realidad, en vez de vivirla
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/25/prismas-por-que-ya-no-vivimos-el-momento-solo-lo-grabamos/
⚖️ “Bruselas multa a Google con 890 millones por abusar de su posición dominante”
La Comisión Europea sanciona a Google con 890 millones de euros por favorecer sus propios servicios en el buscador y por impedir a los desarrolladores de Google Play informar de ofertas más baratas fuera de la tienda.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/24/bruselas-multa-a-google-con-890-millones-por-abusar-de-su-posicion-dominante/
🤖 “El índice de seguridad de IA de 2026: nadie aprueba con nota, y hay un dato que incomoda”
El Índice de Seguridad de IA del Future of Life Institute da un C+ como mejor nota de toda la industria, y no es a Mistral que suspende pese a operar bajo la regulación más estricta del mundo.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/21/indice-de-seguridad-ia-2026/
🔓“Hugging Face hackeada por un agente de IA autónomo.”
Y cuando la empresa quiso investigar el ataque, sus propios modelos de IA se negaron a analizarlo
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/20/hugging-face-hackeada-por-un-agente-de-ia-autonomo/
⚒️”pentest-ai: la herramienta de código abierto que usa IA para poner a prueba la seguridad de una web”
pentest-ai automatiza el pentesting con IA coordinando herramientas ofensivas reales. Con un matiz: solo con un modelo local los datos quedan completamente aislados de terceros
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/19/pentes-ai-herramienta-codigo-abierto-pentest-ia/
⚖️ ”xAI demanda a un usuario por usar Grok para generar deepfakes sexuales de menores”
xAI, la empresa de IA de Elon Musk, demanda a un hombre que usó Grok para crear deepfakes sexuales de menores.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/17/xai-demanda-a-un-usuario-por-usar-grok-para-generar-deepfakes-sexuales-de-menores/
🇪🇺”Bruselas obliga a Google a abrir Android a asistentes de IA rivales de Gemini”
La Comisión Europea impone a Google dos medidas de la DMA: abrir funciones clave de Android a asistentes de IA rivales y compartir sus datos de búsqueda con motores de la competencia.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/16/bruselas-obliga-a-google-a-abrir-android-a-asistentes-de-ia-rivales-de-gemini?-v4
Comunicado oficial NAVAJA NEGRA
Querida comunidad,
Con enorme tristeza queremos comunicar que este año no será posible celebrar una nueva edición del Congreso Navaja Negra.
Es una decisión extremadamente dolorosa para quienes llevamos años trabajando con la ilusión de volver a reunir a nuestra comunidad año tras año. Durante todo este tiempo hemos dedicado incontables horas de trabajo para sacar adelante el Congre…
👮♂️"La Policía Nacional desmantela una red que blanqueó 140 millones con fraude del CEO"
Cuatro detenidos en España, Portugal y Panamá tras una investigación que destapó más de 800 cuentas mula y 94 millones de euros movidos por fraude BEC
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/15/la-policia-nacional-desmantela-una-red-que-blanqueo-140-millones-con-fraude-del-ceo/
🤖”Cómo borrar tus datos de Claude: guía completa de memoria, historial y privacidad”
Aprende a borrar tus datos de Claude: qué guarda la memoria, cómo verla y eliminarla, y cómo evitar que tus chats entrenen los modelos.
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/14/como-borrar-tus-datos-claude/
📎 Microsoft adelanta a 2029 su fecha límite para migrar a criptografía poscuántica
Microsoft ha acelerado su programa de seguridad cuántica y se marca 2029 como fecha para completar la transición de sus productos y servicios críticos a criptografía poscuántica.
Pd: si has entendido la referencia del clip y el nexo Microsoft-clip, revisa el colesterol en la próxima analítica 😂
https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/13/…
🔥7🤔3🤮3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DerechodelaRed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 225,729 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Hacker News @thehackernews · 162,130 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
Vacantes Remotas | Trabajos Remotos @vacantesremotas · 129,215 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Derecho de la Red” (@DerechodelaRed), 15,661 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DerechodelaRed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.