Channel
@ciberpatrullacom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,820subscribers
+101 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001347758710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ciberpatrullacom |
| Created | 29 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ciberpatrullacom |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 5,820 | +9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 5,811 | +12 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 5,799 | +15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 5,784 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 5,776 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 5,770 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 5,761 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 5,754 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 5,744 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 5,740 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 5,734 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 5,730 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 5,720 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 5,719 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 5,719 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
22 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 40.9% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TOR es una gran opción para navegar con privacidad, pero no es la única. 🌐🕵️♂️ Si buscas alternativas, en este artículo te cuento qué opciones existen y cuándo puede interesarte usar cada una. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/alternativas-a-tor/
👏1
🔴 El lunes saco algo, y aviso con tiempo En este oficio nadie enseña sus cartas. No sabes cómo trabaja el detective de la oficina de al lado, ni él sabe cómo trabajas tú. Y así no sabes si vas por delante o por detrás. La semana pasada junté a varios en un directo para hablar de bajas laborales fingidas — el que dice estar de baja y monta un negocio, trabaja en negro o se va a competir el domingo. No todos trabaj…
¿Ese vídeo viral es real o está manipulado? 🎥🔍 Con INVID puedes analizar imágenes y vídeos, detectar montajes y verificar su origen como un investigador. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/invid/
👍1
La ciberinteligencia ya no es exclusiva de gobiernos o grandes empresas. 🌐🧠 Descubre cómo convertir datos dispersos en inteligencia útil para anticiparte a amenazas y tomar mejores decisiones. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/ciberinteligencia-que-es/
👍1
¿Vas a hacer negocios con una empresa? 🤝🔎 Antes de confiar, aprende a comprobar si es fiable y a detectar señales de riesgo con técnicas OSINT. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/empresa-fiable/
👍1🔥1
Una empresa puede ocultar mucho más que sus cuentas. 🏢🔍 Descubre cómo realizar una investigación patrimonial y localizar activos con técnicas OSINT. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/investigacion-patrimonial-empresa
Mañana abro la Puerta C30: la forma de entrar 30 días en OSINT Revolution y trabajar sobre tus propios casos, no sobre ejemplos de manual. Esta vez son solo 20 plazas y cierra el viernes. Aquí te avisaré, pero si no quieres que se te pase, apúntate y te mando toda la información por email: https://ciberpatrulla.com/unirse/
¿Empresa real o empresa fantasma? 👻🏢 Algunas compañías existen solo sobre el papel. Aprende a detectar señales de alerta e investigar su actividad con OSINT. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/empresa-fantasma/
👍1
Investigar una empresa va mucho más allá de consultar su web corporativa. 🏢🔎 Detrás de cada compañía hay datos, conexiones y señales que pueden revelar riesgos u oportunidades. En este artículo te explico cómo investigar una empresa con OSINT y qué información puedes obtener paso a paso. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/investigar-empresa/
👏6
Los NFT no solo atraen coleccionistas… también estafadores. 🎨🚨 Aprende a identificar las señales de alerta y a investigar posibles fraudes relacionados con NFT. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/estafa-nft/
Identificar una wallet puede revelar mucho más de lo que imaginas. 💰🔎 Movimientos, conexiones y patrones pueden ayudarte a seguir el rastro de una investigación cripto. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/identificar-wallets-criptomonedas/
Las criptomonedas parecen anónimas, pero cada transacción queda registrada. ⛓️🔍 Con un explorador de bloques puedes seguir movimientos, direcciones y obtener pistas clave en tus investigaciones. 👉 https://ciberpatrulla.com/explorador-bloques/
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ciberpatrullacom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ciberpatrulla - Técnicas OSINT” (@ciberpatrullacom), 5,820 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciberpatrullacom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.