9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,719–4,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 11:13
4,722
-1
27 Aug 2026, 02:12
4,723
+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:38
4,722
-8
20 Aug 2026, 07:48
4,730
-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:57
4,733
-4
14 Aug 2026, 19:38
4,737
-4
11 Aug 2026, 04:51
4,741
+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:17
4,739
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06
4,739
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.70%
avg views ÷ 4,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
411
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
26 (15 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
2,466
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
85
75.9%
👍
24
21.4%
🔥
2
1.79%
👏
1
0.893%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟥UNA HISTORIA DE ESPÍAS 🟥
La trampa dulce paquistaní, otra obra de ingeniería social al servicio del espionaje.
Un comandante de ala de la Fuerza Aérea India ha sido detenido en Nueva Delhi acusado de haber sido víctima de una operación de espionaje conocida como “honey trap”, mediante la cual agentes vinculados a los servicios de inteligencia pakistaníes habrían conseguido ganarse su confianza para obtener informa…
🌍 INTELIGENCIA Y GEOPOLÍTICA 🦉
El Magreb no se juega únicamente sobre el terreno. La información forma parte cada vez más de un escenario marcado por la rivalidad entre Marruecos y Argelia y por unos intereses españoles que sitúan a Ceuta y Melilla en una posición especialmente sensible.
En este nuevo Documento de Análisis Minerva abordamos la batalla narrativa en el Magreb, su dimensión digital y las dificultades …
🌍 Noticias Minerva | 8 de agosto de 2026
La atención vuelve a concentrarse en el Estrecho de Ormuz. Estados Unidos asegura que Irán y Omán están cerca de alcanzar un acuerdo que permita restablecer la navegación comercial. Washington condiciona el levantamiento de su bloqueo sobre puertos iraníes al cumplimiento efectivo del pacto, mientras siguen pendientes cuestiones sensibles sobre el grado de control que conserv…
🎙️ PARTICIPACIÓN MINERVA
El coronel José Ignacio Castro Torres, subdirector de Minerva Institute y experto en Oriente Medio, participa en Radio Sefarad para analizar los límites de la presión internacional sobre Israel y los condicionantes que siguen marcando su seguridad.
Una conversación sobre seguridad, presión exterior y un escenario regional en permanente transformación.
🎧 Escucha la intervención completa en …
🟥UNA HISTORIA DE ESPÍAS🟥
En enero de 1953, un informe de la CIA llegó a los escritorios de Washington describiendo algo que casi nadie en Occidente había visto jamás: un nuevo tipo de arma de infantería soviética detectada cerca de Leningrado. El rifle en sí era un secreto de Estado tan bien guardado que el agente que lo detectó no pudo fotografiarlo, ni acercarse lo suficiente para examinarlo adecuadamente, y tampo…
🌍 Actualidad geopolítica
El Sahel continúa consolidándose como el principal foco de inestabilidad yihadista a escala global.
En Mali, la cooperación táctica entre JNIM y el Frente de Liberación de Azawad (FLA) ha incrementado la presión sobre las fuerzas gubernamentales y sus aliados, evidenciando una evolución del conflicto hacia operaciones más coordinadas y de mayor alcance. Esta dinámica refuerza la capacidad d…
💊PÍLDORA MINERVA
La desinformación no siempre consiste en inventar hechos. Con frecuencia se construye a partir de datos reales, pero presentados de forma parcial, fuera de contexto o en un orden diseñado para influir en la percepción de quien los recibe.
Por eso, verificar una información no es únicamente comprobar si un dato es verdadero o falso. También implica analizar quién la difunde, en qué contexto aparece,…
🌍 Noticias Minerva | 1 de agosto de 2026
Irán vuelve a elevar la presión en el Estrecho de Ormuz tras impedir la salida de varios buques, mientras Washington estudia nuevos ataques por la ofensiva iraní contra la navegación y las posiciones estadounidenses en el Golfo.
Arabia Saudí impulsa una coalición marítima para proteger el mar Rojo y sus rutas energéticas, cada vez más expuestas a la amenaza hutí. La inseguri…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @M_inerva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tokin Privacy @TokinPrivacy · 50,519 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕵🏼♀️MINERVA INSTITUTE🦉” (@M_inerva), 4,722 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M_inerva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.