Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Democracia Nacional🇪🇸 Nacionalismo 🇪🇸.

Channel

Democracia Nacional🇪🇸 Nacionalismo 🇪🇸.

@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,001subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255898382
TypeChannel
Username@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL
DescriptionÚnico Canal de comunicación oficial (DN). Democracia Nacional es tu organización NACIONALISTA. 🇪🇦Los Españoles primero🇪🇦 Contacto: +34 644 80 70 78. 💻[email protected] C/Edgar Neville (Madrid). www.democracianacional.es
Created28 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@PedroChaparro/30391 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL/9037 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC1.0019 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@PedroChaparro6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.0 hours@PedroChaparro (4–2)
@aquilavozdeeuropa9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0059 minutesthis entry (7–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 94 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @PedroChaparro. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,9208,0017,960.56 August 2026 — 7,955 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,952 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,953 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,954 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,971 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,964 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,956 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,936 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,935 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,943 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,939 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,933 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,923 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,920 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,961 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,987 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,982 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,977 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,985 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,986 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,987 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,991 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,990 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,991 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,001 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,908–8,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 13:598,001+10
7 Nov 2026, 08:217,991+1
1 Nov 2026, 08:177,990-1
29 Oct 2026, 11:177,991+4
26 Oct 2026, 18:567,987+1
23 Oct 2026, 23:167,986+1
20 Oct 2026, 16:057,985+8
17 Oct 2026, 21:447,977-5
14 Oct 2026, 17:057,982-5
11 Oct 2026, 17:377,987+26
5 Oct 2026, 01:027,961+41
26 Sept 2026, 04:567,920-3
17 Sept 2026, 02:587,923-10
12 Sept 2026, 23:397,933-6
8 Sept 2026, 20:417,939-4
3 Sept 2026, 12:377,943+8
31 Aug 2026, 13:127,935-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:427,936-20
23 Aug 2026, 07:127,956-8
20 Aug 2026, 02:117,964first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 8,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held104 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total65,109
Reactions total2,100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,760
Videos
≈898
Links
≈4,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43m 05s
Average length
2m 42s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,208 reactions across 96 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,67032.1%
🔥1,22323.5%
👏81615.7%
👍69313.3%
❤3366.45%
💯2043.92%
⚡871.67%
😡771.48%
👎360.691%
🏆320.614%
🍾290.557%
✍50.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (31.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 18:31 UTC673 views48 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Ni siquiera tras el golpe de estado separatista de 2017, que acabó con todo tipo de disturbios violentos callejeros, nadie inició acción legal alguna contra los partidos que lo promovieron (solo se hizo contra personas particulares) Y eso que públicamente habían estado buscando el apoyo de potencias extranjeras para su proyecto secesionista. Un caso de alta traición de manual. Aún así, nadie movió un dedo para que c…

🔥34👍8❤4👎2

Signed Miguel

12 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC686 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

De Utopía se Muere Max Romano, Jornadas de la Disidencia, sábado 14, 10:30

👍20👏4⚡1

Signed Max

10 Nov 2026, 22:25 UTC746 views80 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @PedroChaparroPhoto

Hoy a colación de la persecución hacia la cúpula de Núcleo Nacional recordamos otra de las operaciones que el PSOE realizó hace 19 años para ilegalizar Democracia Nacional y arruinar la vida de un patriota español. Hoy 11 de noviembre regresamos a uno de los episodios más trágicos de la confrontación política en las calles de Madrid. El 11 de noviembre de 2007, una manifestación legalmente convocada por Democracia …

👏42❤22👍12🔥2⚡1🍾1

Signed DISIDENTE_PC

10 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC≈1,210 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026

No podemos justificar ni plantear la inmigración desde un punto de vista laboral y económico porque estaríamos comprando el marco a nuestros enemigos. España no es una hoja excel ni un mercado de trabajo. A trabajar tampoco queremos que vengan. Pero es que ni eso. Desde el punto de vista económico, la inmigración también es una ruina y un engaño. https://www.abc.es/economia/confirmado-seguridad-social-inmigrantes-ed…

👏25💯16❤1

Signed Miguel

10 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,340 views45 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Feijóo se sigue cubriendo de gloria. 14 millones de inmigrantes (o más) en España. Entre 5 y 6 millones desde que gobierna Sánchez, Ceuta invadida, Canarias invadida, media Sudamérica colapsando España entrando sin control por los aeropuertos, tenemos una gigantesca quinta columna marroquí dentro de España, cifras de reemplazo poblacional de auténtico terror… ¿Y qué propone este personaje? Que sigan viniendo inmigr…

🤬40🔥4😡1

Signed Miguel

10 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,250 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Frontex es el equivalente europeo de nuestro Salvamento Marítimo. Históricamente se ha dedicado a hacer de servicio de taxi marítimo recogiendo a los invasores y remolcándolos hacia Europa. Frontex está a las órdenes directas de Von der Leyen y del resto de traidores globalistas de Bruselas, los mismos que se están posicionando con Marruecos contra España en plena invasión de Ceuta. ¿En serio Feijóo les va a subcon…

🤬20😡13🔥6❤1👍1

Signed Miguel

10 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC882 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @PedroChaparroPhoto

PUCHERAZO Escrutinio electoral, ¿quien cuenta los votos? https://victimasdelospoliticos.org/escrutinio-electoral-quien-cuenta-los-votos/

🔥33🤬6⚡3

Signed DISIDENTE_PC

9 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,970 views43 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

VOX Y EL HISPANCHISMO https://www.democracianacional.es/afiliaciones

🔥25🤬7🏆4💯3❤2👍2

Signed DISIDENTE_PC

9 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,670 views48 reactionsread 13 November 2026

No faltan viviendas, sobran inmigrantes. https://theobjective.com/opinion/2026-11-09/inmigracion-explica-41-subida-alquiler-un-pais-sin-casas/

👏42⚡4👍2

Signed Miguel

7 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,770 views56 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Traducción: El 40% eran moro-panchos (esto lo reconoce hasta La Sexta) y del 60% restante, la mitad eran rojos marxistas terroristas antifas de aquí y la otra mitad moronegros y panchos con DNI español. https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/sociedad/perfil-detenidos-blocus-mas-60-eran-espanoles-muchos-ellos-tenian-conexiones-bandas-juveniles_202611076aef2a50d3bddc0868a8d270.html

🤬41🔥12😡2❤1

Signed Miguel

7 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,310 views101 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @max_romano_info_oso

La Policía Nacional actúa contra Núcleo Nacional con 12 detenidos Traducido en cristiano, infame operación asustaviejas para agitar el espantajo del fascismo antes de las elecciones Con todo mi respeto por las señoras mayores, a menudo con la cabeza más centrada que las viejas asustadas de todas las edades y ambos sexos que pululan en España Pensemos lo que pensemos de NN, independientemente de su discutible estét…

🤬64👍16👏10🔥4❤3⚡2✍1👎1

Signed Max

6 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC979 views104 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @PedroChaparroPhoto

Solidaridad con los amigos de Núcleo Nacional. Una organización nacionalista legalmente constituida merece todas las garantías y no la 'caza de brujas' que están sufriendo. Algunos padecimos cárcel injustamente por defender España pero sepan que SANGRE Y REPRESIÓN NO FRENARÁ LA REVOLUCIÓN. https://x.com/PedroChaparroDN/status/2118672268263866696?a=GfsCxKNaVgCFYJFw-a8&s=19

👏80❤14🔥10

Signed DISIDENTE_PC

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Núcleo Nacional🏴
@unetenucleonacional · 32,764
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 September 2026
Roberto Vaquero
@RobertoVaqueroTelegram · 20,661
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
TSA Noticias 🇪🇸
@TSANoticias · 62,653
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Santiago Abascal 🇪🇸
@SantiagoAbascalPresidente · 39,761
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Herqles
@herQles · 47,515
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
CASOS AISLADOS 2026
@CasosAislados · 19,394
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 October 2026
David Santos
@davidsantosvlog · 31,570
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA
@ULTIMA_HORA · 37,061
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
𝑼𝑵𝑬 80 𝑰𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂
@une80 · 44,889
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Vito Quiles 🇪🇸
@vitoquilestelegram · 147,504
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Alvise Pérez
@Alviseperez · 600,535
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
DESOKUPA OFICIAL
@desokupaOficial · 46,662
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Ciudadanos de Uniforme
@ciudadanosdeuniforme · 28,934
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
CANAL 5TV INFORMA
@canal5informa · 42,062
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Julio Ariza
@Julioarizaeltoro · 49,624
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Democracia Nacional🇪🇸 Nacionalismo 🇪🇸.” (@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL), 8,001 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.