Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CCN

Channel

CCN

@CCNCERT

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

6,877subscribers

+182 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385811594
TypeChannel
Username@CCNCERT
DescriptionCapacidad de Repuesta a Incidentes del Centro Criptológico Nacional que, como CERT Gubernamental Nacional, contribuye a reforzar la ciberseguridad en España.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CCNCERT

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6956,8776,7866 August 2026 — 6,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,696 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,702 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,707 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,714 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,726 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,733 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,741 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,745 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,741 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,758 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,764 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,782 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,789 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,798 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,803 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,811 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,815 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,842 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,850 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,858 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,862 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,865 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,871 subscribers11 November 2026 — 6,877 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 98 days, net +182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,668–6,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 22:176,877+6
8 Nov 2026, 03:076,871+6
5 Nov 2026, 08:496,865+3
2 Nov 2026, 17:196,862+4
30 Oct 2026, 15:206,858+8
27 Oct 2026, 13:396,850+8
24 Oct 2026, 03:586,842+27
20 Oct 2026, 18:176,815+4
17 Oct 2026, 19:306,811+8
15 Oct 2026, 00:276,803+5
11 Oct 2026, 16:206,798+9
5 Oct 2026, 00:386,789+7
25 Sept 2026, 17:406,782+18
15 Sept 2026, 07:386,764+6
11 Sept 2026, 09:016,758+17
6 Sept 2026, 04:166,741-4
2 Sept 2026, 01:386,745+4
27 Aug 2026, 06:176,741+8
24 Aug 2026, 02:486,733+7
20 Aug 2026, 02:186,726first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.9%
avg views ÷ 6,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held48 (23 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total45,290
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1
Links
≈2,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC425 viewsread 12 November 2026

🚨 El CCN avisa de una actualización de seguridad para #Apache HTTP Server que resuelve una vulnerabilidad crítica. Se recomienda actualizar inmediatamente y aplicar medidas de mitigación Más info 👉https://t.co/LuHeyUY0Se https://t.co/rZwVueP5AM — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 12, 2026

12 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC531 viewsread 12 November 2026

🔐 El CCN publica 25 nuevas guías y actualiza otras 9 de la serie CCN-STIC 1000 sobre Procedimientos de Empleo Seguro (PES) de productos y servicios TIC: Identidad, detección y respuesta, redes, nube y móviles. Más info 👉 https://t.co/6aFpSKxaEC #CCNSTIC #Ciberseguridad https://t.co/ETdDwVjnMj — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 12, 2026

11 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC954 viewsread 12 November 2026

@Accenture, @opennac, #CSA, @DotForce_Spain, @googlecloud, @IndraCompany, @Procesia1, @Telefonica, #TRC y @Yubico: patrocinadores estratégicos de las XX Jornadas STIC Un espacio para sumar capacidades. #STIC2026 #Patrocinadores #Estratégico 🔗 jornadas.ccn-cert.cni.es/es/xxjornadas

6 Nov 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 12 November 2026

La IA abre nuevas posibilidades pero, ¿qué implica su uso ofensivo y por qué es clave comprenderlo? Una aproximación a uno de los conceptos centrales de las XX Jornadas STIC. 👇 https://t.co/nngEVVnUzU https://t.co/Np6675CHiI — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 6, 2026

5 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 12 November 2026

Las XX Jornadas STIC cuentan con @IZERTIS y @s2grupo como patrocinadores VIP. Dos compañías que se suman a una cita clave para compartir conocimiento y fortalecer la cooperación en ciberseguridad. #STIC2026 #Patrocinadores #VIP https://t.co/SCzTa1Nd4Q — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 5, 2026

5 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 12 November 2026

🤝 3 nuevas entidades en la Red Nacional de SOC 🏛️Públicas: @CSUC_info 🏣Proveedoras: @inforges y #DMNTR Network Solutions Ya son 344 las entidades adheridas que, en octubre, compartieron más de 30.200 eventos Más info 👉https://t.co/23sWdEgfKm https://t.co/bKyKaUAZxa — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 5, 2026

3 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 12 November 2026

📘 El CCN facilita a las 618 entidades que han participado en la autoevaluación sobre preparación ante #IAOfensiva, un Plan de Acción con 53 iniciativas. Destacan: parcheo de vulnerabilidades, MFA resistente al phishing y control cadena de suministro 👉https://t.co/TNWWrfGADO https://t.co/Oy9Kja9W5T — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Nov 3, 2026

30 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 12 November 2026

La estrategia 'Cosecha Ahora, Descifra Después' muestra la necesidad de prepararse frente a los riesgos de la computación cuántica.🔐 En las XX Jornadas #STIC2026 habrá ponencias sobre esta amenaza y sus implicaciones en la protección de la información🔗https://t.co/nngEVVnUzU https://t.co/RH6it1Fu4x — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Oct 30, 2026

29 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,530 viewsread 12 November 2026

🚀Nueva metodología del CCN para evaluación de seguridad de productos con inteligencia artificial recogida en la #GuíaCCNSTIC_2011 Establece un marco común para que fabricantes y organismos puedan confiar en la seguridad de los productos con IA Más info👉https://t.co/QwlP4NgDwg https://t.co/vEhYH7TAsX — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Oct 29, 2026

28 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 12 November 2026

📢 El CCN renueva su herramienta de Gobernanza INÉS con el fin de facilitar la adecuación al ENS y consolidar la información de ciberseguridad de los organismos públicos. Las novedades se presentarán en las próximas #STIC2026 -Sala 6- Más info 👉https://t.co/vH75nwhMgj https://t.co/v9ehhWI8gp — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Oct 28, 2026

27 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 12 November 2026

El CCN incorpora 4 nuevos productos y 1 servicio al catálogo #CPSTIC de octubre en las categorías de: protección de redes y sistemas, protección de la información, de dispositivos y perímetro y un servicio de control de accesos. Más info 👉https://t.co/jM72oSibTD https://t.co/bG9rrcbNYT — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Oct 27, 2026

26 Oct 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 12 November 2026

🆙El CCN actualiza su #GuíaCCN_STIC 106, que establece el procedimiento para incorporar soluciones a su Catálogo CPSTIC, tanto en el listado de cualificados como en el de Conformidad y Gobernanza. Más info 👉https://t.co/NnuFEVUf8C https://t.co/8R8gBN5l2Z — Centro Criptológico Nacional (@CCNCERT) Oct 26, 2026

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @CCNCERT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Policía Nacional
@policianacional · 19,337
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 October 2026
🔒Seguridad Informática
@seguridadinformatic4 · 29,192
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Ciudadanos de Uniforme
@ciudadanosdeuniforme · 28,934
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
ViajerosPiratas - Viajes y Vuelos baratos
@Viajerospiratas · 66,650
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026
Forocoches
@forocoches_oficial · 41,913
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
manfred
@getmanfred · 18,898
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 28,057
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
The Hacker News
@thehackernews · 165,587
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
SPE INFORMACIÓN
@SPE112 · 25,049
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
🛡 Cybersecurity & Privacy 🛡 - News
@cibsecurity · 29,268
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
Stark Privacy
@StarkPrivacy · 19,841
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
Xataka
@xataka · 48,826
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Tokin Privacy
@TokinPrivacy · 49,625
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
eldiario.es
@eldiarioes · 44,720
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q59771478 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelNo label recorded on this Wikidata item
X / Twitter@CcnCert
Official sitehttps://www.ccn-cert.cni.es

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CCN” (@CCNCERT), 6,877 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCNCERT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.