更完善了
Signed 淡い夏

Channel
@light_summer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,397subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001874717745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @light_summer |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/light_summer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,397 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,398 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 1,392 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,391 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (24 December 2024 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,109 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
381 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 34.9% | |
| 🥰 | 86 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 11.5% | |
| 🎄 | 39 | 10.2% | |
| 🎉 | 39 | 10.2% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 2.36% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.525% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.525% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.525% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.525% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.262% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
更完善了
Signed 淡い夏
重大更新 https://github.com/wxxsfxyzm/MiuiBackGestureHook/releases/tag/0.8.0 本模块研究性质更多一些,如果觉得日志多,请自行编译关闭 如果需要RETURN_TO_HOME动画,你需要7.50.x的小米桌面 Edit: https://github.com/wxxsfxyzm/MiuiBackGestureHook/releases/tag/0.8.1 miuix动画下CROSS_TASK保持aosp样式,背景压暗 热重载可能有点问题,升级完以后重启下系统界面和桌面作用域
Signed 淡い夏
是我之前想要的东西) 之前用 HyperOS 1 的时候挺希望能把手势实现换回 AOSP 那套的,现在有人做了,挺好的
❤4
Signed 淡い夏
为你的小米恢复AOSP预测返回动画和手势 独立于小米桌面实现,换native桌面无影响 LSPosed API 102,第一次安装需要重启 小米的防误触优化会无效 小米的侧边栏会拉不出来 横屏逻辑会有一些问题 在AOSP不处理手势的区域还是会由桌面接管 手势指示器会变成AOSP的样子 由于完全恢复了AOSP的逻辑,在AOSP能够处理的区域,预测返回进度天生就是正常的,无需修复 基于 Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 3.0.315.2 开发,理论上安卓16 HyperOS均可用,不对可用性做保证 不接受AOSP手势本身问题的反馈 如果有兴趣在此基础上继续优化的,请联系我
❤4❤🔥1
Signed 淡い夏
感觉是好玩的东西)
Signed 淡い夏
当时看见这个变化我就想玩点花活,开HTTP服务器或者SMB服务器太普通了,不够有趣。 https://github.com/vvb2060/pxeboot pxe启动,俗称无盘启动、网络开机:在手机上打开app,同一局域网内的电脑就能启动到Linux或者WindowsPE。(可惜Google不认为这很有趣,所以它需要root
🥰3❤1👍1
Signed 淡い夏
我在 HyperOS 1 那会还对系统应用重写抱点希望来着 这么看感觉是真烂完了 前段时间稍微碰了下 Flutter,感觉是真有点抽象 也是真不理解为什么不要跨平台的东西要用 Flutter 来造
❤10🔥2
Signed 淡い夏
试用了一下小米的新桌面,我也想发表一下自己的感受了 小米是真的要完蛋了,快跑路吧 - No dex, hook全失效了 - 这也就意味着预测返回还是没修,而且模块无法修复了,介意的不要更新 - flutter烂泥一样的手感懂的都懂 - flutter的渲染全是锯齿 - 后台卡片和抽屉卡到爆炸 - 很多地方的打断都失效了,经常被硬控 - 并行动画几乎无法触发 - 不支持安卓的自适应图标,矢量图读取错误 - 壁纸模糊设置失效 - 打开关闭应用时候的应用图标完全就没处理 ...
🤩9❤1
Signed 淡い夏
新年快乐~ (Chinese New Year
🥰25❤8🎉4
Signed 淡い夏
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥰10❤3
Signed 淡い夏
新年快乐~ 去年没啥时间维护这个频道,不知道今年会怎么样)
🎄23❤10🥰5
Signed 淡い夏
新年快乐~ (Chinese New Year
🎉32💊3❤1
Signed 淡い夏
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @light_summer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 805,355 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“淡い夏の阁楼” (@light_summer), 1,397 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/light_summer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.