Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AdClose Official

Channel

AdClose Official

@AdClose

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,436subscribers

+366 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003426322
TypeChannel
Username@AdClose
Description发布模块更新 AdClose 是一个基于Xposed框架的Android广告屏蔽工具,致力于提供一个无广告的应用浏览体验,旨在优化用户体验并减少干扰。请在LSPosed框架环境中使用。
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AdClose

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,06212,43612,2497 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,062 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,074 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,081 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,086 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,098 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,100 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,102 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,110 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,100 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,099 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,104 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,119 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,146 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,153 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,160 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,166 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,173 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,205 subscribers3 October 2026 — 12,246 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,261 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,275 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,273 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,274 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,273 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,282 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,287 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,289 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,301 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,306 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,311 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,316 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,327 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,336 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,345 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,355 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,365 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,368 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,372 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,382 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,384 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,387 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,404 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,420 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,436 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net +366. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,006–12,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:3812,436+16
8 Nov 2026, 14:4412,420+16
7 Nov 2026, 12:0112,404+17
6 Nov 2026, 08:2912,387+3
5 Nov 2026, 05:5512,384+2
4 Nov 2026, 07:5612,382+10
3 Nov 2026, 09:3112,372+4
2 Nov 2026, 06:4812,368+3
1 Nov 2026, 08:0812,365+10
31 Oct 2026, 10:1812,355+10
30 Oct 2026, 08:2812,345+9
29 Oct 2026, 05:2712,336+9
28 Oct 2026, 03:1012,327+11
26 Oct 2026, 04:4612,316+5
25 Oct 2026, 03:2712,311+5
24 Oct 2026, 00:0912,306+5
23 Oct 2026, 01:4712,301+12
20 Oct 2026, 18:1812,289+2
19 Oct 2026, 17:1412,287+5
17 Oct 2026, 13:3812,282first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.6%
avg views ÷ 12,436 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held22 (29 March 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total10,110
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
4
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,051 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤45943.7%
👍24122.9%
🥰18317.4%
🔥999.42%
👀292.76%
👏272.57%
💯40.381%
😘30.285%
🤗30.285%
👎10.095%
😁10.095%
🫡10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,051 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,800 views51 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

🟠优化页面功能 🟠修复潜在问题 MCP在路上

👍46🔥5

25 Oct 2026, 03:27 UTC≈7,310 views79 reactionsread 10 November 2026

现在的 AI 太强了,有点怀念手搓时代😂,感慨人类程序员真是一败涂地。项目可能会在下月初开始维护,同时也会使用一些 AI 辅助,这里可以提些功能,当然还是不愿意做针对性的功能,避免不必要的麻烦

❤76👍3

29 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈20,000 views91 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

🟠 增加Block规则订阅(Domain/Keyword)

🔥63👏17❤8🥰3

29 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈18,200 views65 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤47👍15🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈16,000 viewsread 10 November 2026
Poll

因为此模块不同于Host等代理工具,所以没有做规则订阅的适配,还是在这里投个票决定要不要做吧

  1. 做86%
  2. 不需要14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC≈13,700 views55 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

🟠 修复潜在问题 🟠 优化页面功能 🟠 优化数据通信 🟠 完善Log分层

👍42❤10😘3

24 May 2026, 13:54 UTC≈21,200 views54 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

🟠 修复请求拦截失效

❤53😁1

24 May 2026, 04:57 UTC≈18,400 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

🟠 Bug修复及功能优化

❤31🔥3

20 May 2026, 13:52 UTC≈15,300 views27 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @LSPosed

v2.0.3 released: Major Behavioral Changes - Legacy modules are no longer allowed to call libxposed API; modules with targetApiVersion ≥ 102 will not be allowed to call legacy API; 101 modules are unaffected New Features - Introduced Material 3 Expressive style manager - Enhanced theme-related settings to support dynamic color schemes and dark mode, and improved the display of cards, menus, bottom navigation, and dia…

❤20👏6🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AdClose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@AdClose edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @AdClose as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
37 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTCFinal Results582 voters

因为此模块不同于Host等代理工具,所以没有做规则订阅的适配,还是在这里投个票决定要不要做吧

  1. 做86%
  2. 不需要14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LuckyTool
@LuckyTool · 31,335
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026
LSPosed
@LSPosed · 201,314
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 17 August 2026
Nagram Tips
@NagramTips · 52,085
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
NPatch
@NPatch · 20,002
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 October 2026
SCENE Downloads
@scene2023 · 57,569
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026
HyperCeiler | Release & Notice
@cemiuiler_release · 28,008
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
Magisk alpha
@magiskalpha · 66,523
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 21 August 2026
FunProject
@QToolCI · 50,216
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
5ec1cff
@real5ec1cff · 40,018
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 September 2026
Real Nullptr
@nullptr_dev · 21,432
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 September 2026
QAuxiliary
@QAuxiliary · 44,497
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
HyperCeiler | Canary Test
@cemiuiler_canary · 21,454
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 October 2026
Matsuridayo GitHub
@MatsuriDayo · 45,738
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
LSPosedArchives
@LSPosedArchives · 27,090
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 September 2026
QAuxiliary CI Builds
@QAuxiliary_CI · 19,690
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 October 2026
哔哩漫游
@biliroaming · 56,376
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AdClose Official” (@AdClose), 12,436 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AdClose.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.