6 measurements spanning 11 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,466–8,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 03:43
8,540
+30
14 Aug 2026, 22:16
8,510
+19
11 Aug 2026, 11:05
8,491
+12
8 Aug 2026, 03:58
8,479
+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:01
8,476
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:49
8,476
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
11
Videos
21
Links
19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
463 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
381
82.3%
🔥
44
9.50%
🤔
21
4.54%
😁
9
1.94%
👎
4
0.864%
😱
3
0.648%
🤬
1
0.216%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
从我的想法来看,现在的各种 Claw 的正确路线应该是部署在手机上,比如小米的 MiClaw,能通过电源键或语音唤醒。
如果要用 A 手机控制 B 手机,就在 B 手机上装好接口供 Claw 调用。电脑上也装好接口给手机调用。以手机做为一个操作终端,其它一切设备提供接口去给手机调用。 而不是现在的好多把模型部署在电脑上,然后接到 qq、微信之类的聊天软件当中去。
甚至在家中设备或者服务器上部署好大模型,手机只有一个小型模型,下达任务后,简单任务就手机小模型处理,复杂任务就传到大算力设备上的模型去处理,手机只充当一个调度中心,调度算力和任务分配。
这样才算是真正的分布式系统,mcp 本质不就是 ai 远程调用一个工具,工具返回结果告诉你完成的怎么样?就和米家远程操控个洗衣机,洗衣机返回洗衣状态一样的?米家本可以把自己的协议作为 ai 时代的标准协议的,在如此深厚的米家生态设备基础上,哪轮得上现在的 mcp 协议上位。
本来…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @InstallerX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LSPosed @LSPosed · 189,190 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“InstallerX” (@InstallerX), 8,540 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InstallerX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.