Zero signals shipped in the last 24 hours, and of the 0 closed and evaluated, 0 percent hit TP1. The day’s pull came from n/a, with 0 net bps. A tape that fought us.

Channel
📊 Bykaranteli.Com
@bykaranteli_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
125,518subscribers
-1,748 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002076688575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bykaranteli_com |
| Description | The crypto futures terminal trained to be honest. Every signal is rule-bound. Every outcome is logged. Every metric is post-fee. ByKaranteli publishes its live track record, not a backtest, not marketing copy. https://bykaranteli.com |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bykaranteli_com |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 125,518 | -455 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 125,973 | -368 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 126,341 | -175 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 126,516 | -241 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 126,757 | -257 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 127,014 | -252 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 127,266 | first reading |
Engagement
203 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.045%
- avg views ÷ 125,518 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 56.0
- 203 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.58%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 203
- of 203 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 203 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 203 (15 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,367 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,400
- Videos
- ≈7
- Links
- ≈124
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
At 59.17% BTC dominance, the tape is waiting and capital is still parked with $BTC rather than rotating into alts. The 11.24% $ETH dominance print alone does not confirm rotation; we would need dominance to break lower with follow through before calling a move out of $BTC and into the wider market.
Fear and greed is still in Greed at 66, but the 5 point 24h drop points to cooling appetite. Stablecoin cap sits at $309.1B with a 0.07% 24h rise while $BTC dominance holds at 59.12%, a posture that leans risk off and back toward $BTC over alts.
$ETH order flow entered its most toxic decile, with VPIN at 0.1611 and a 98th percentile reading. Readings in this zone have historically clustered before volatility, and VPIN says nothing about direction. Since 2026, days in this low band saw a median +0.9% BTC move over the next 7d (n=31, base -0.5%, 1y of records). History, not a forecast.
Altcoin Season Index is 58, no clear season, with 29 of 50 sampled alts beating $BTC over 90 days. The index is up 2 over the last 7 days, with $BTW up 1022.2% over 90 days and $TAC down -90.4%.
$AVAX on kraken long and HTX short offers the widest spread on the board at 0.044% with a 38.79% net APR after fees. This is the edge desks farm while others argue direction, a clean read on where leverage sits.
Short crowding is the read here, with $ZKC leading at 4.8% OI growth and 0.005% funding. When shorts are leaning in while OI is still building, the move can keep pressing until funding or price fails to confirm, and $EDEN already shows that split with -0.09% OI and -0.0296% funding.
A 1M market order costs 0.3 bps on $BTC and 35.5 bps on $LINK. Thin books raise cascade risk because less depth can let forced flows move price more quickly across levels.
New perpetual listing: $CYBERLEEK is now live on BingX. Fresh listings tend to open with volatile funding and thin books in the first sessions.
In the last 30 minutes, 18.8M of ETH shorts and 1.3M of ETH longs were liquidated across major venues from the raw liquidation streams. Historically, that kind of skew has often marked a short squeeze, though it does not guarantee what happens next.
$BTC ETFs logged 5 straight sessions of net inflows, with $307M added today led by $IBIT at $239M. $ETH ETFs took in $185M, and the 5 day $BTC net of $1.9B keeps the flow trend pointed to inflows. Since 2025, days in this high band saw a median -0.1% BTC move over the next 7d (n=102, base -0.4%, 1y of records). History, not a forecast.
$ETH is leaning lower while 2427 holds under the 2432 liquidity pocket. If sellers keep control, price likely probes 2409 first, then 2398 as the next downside magnet. A clean move back above 2432 would challenge that setup and open the door to a squeeze higher. Until then, the path of least resistance stays to the downside. $ETH still looks heavy below 2432, with 2409 and 2398 next in play. A move back above 2432 w…
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @bykaranteli_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bpaynews · 18,328#1
@gemrocketapp · 7,280#2
@theTapCoins · 3,067,593#3
@therealyescoin · 2,175,638#4
@binance_announcements · 3,589,473#5
@TradeOS_news · 541,510#6
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,793,488#7
@boinkersnews · 2,686,964#8
@blumcrypto · 15,317,872#9
@hamster_kombat · 21,735,408#10
@official_BCcoin · 92,835#11
@notcoin · 9,084,063#12
@boomloudcoin · 1,732,272#13
@banana_update · 1,455,195#14
@bykarantelicom · 8,297#15
@seedupdates · 8,694,990#16
@theyescoin · 6,078,192#17
@tomarket_ai · 7,073,391#18
@catizenann · 3,734,589#19
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,630,330#20
@coincoinai · 1,866,533#21
@trendingapps · 3,955,278#22
@hotonnear · 4,866,592#23
@hexnio · 2,084,523#24
@gram · 6,935,915#25
@catapult_extreme · 9,035,490#26
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,288,848#27
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,203,038#28
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,615,585#29
@pigscrew · 2,234,256#30
@Cats_housewtf · 8,469,871#31
@watbird · 1,536,886#32
@fx_holding_community · 6,420,676#33
@gameechannel · 1,972,060#34
@rockyrabbitio · 3,646,711#35
@EraOfExplorers · 746,686#36
@catgoldminerann · 945,997#37
@the_vertus · 2,228,343#38
@monorixofficial · 1,398,546#39
@zenqiratech · 8,384#40
@dotcoincommunity · 4,166,245#41
@tapswapai · 10,785,090#42
@tonkeeper_news · 5,014,659#43
@onus_globalchannel · 1,725,229#44
@builders · 3,547,412#45
@nomis_protocol · 1,608,537#46
@cultofnot · 1,054,809#47
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,250,246#48
@iamalexfalcon · 3,259,226#49
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,281,687#50
@tonbox · 509,658#51
@smpl_app · 1,691,655#52
@deckforge_official · 2,169,067#53
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,614,893#54
@Monkey_on_TON · 855,125#55
@avagoldcoin · 1,838,846#56
@pocketfi · 1,876,848#57
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,306,294#58
@Coin_Strategist · 1,090,458#59
@ToNmetasilense · 2,925,613#60
@diamoremarket · 344,908#61
@retrocraftio · 1,562#62
@airdrophub_great · 565,367#63
@metazoneofficial · 585,443#64
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,193,174#65
@money · 3,189,076#66
@battle_games_com · 2,826,063#67
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,201,455#68
@Birds_announcement · 1,610,908#69
@UXUYcom · 1,092,678#70
@fintopionews · 2,405,183#71
@dogs · 7,394,268#72
@mediarussia · 1,532,184#73
@corn_battles · 1,083,895#74
@realgoats_channel · 4,956,106#75
@token_1win · 3,114,711#76
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,132,106#77
@TaskNChannel · 955,063#78
@hayzonn · 2,993,105#79
@tonstationgames · 3,343,736#80
@autoruss · 868,286#81
@vestirussia · 1,031,520#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@official_BCcoin · 92,835
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📊 Bykaranteli.Com” (@bykaranteli_com), 125,518 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bykaranteli_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.