Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sirliboyev Umurzak | 🇺🇿

Channel

Sirliboyev Umurzak | 🇺🇿

@sirliboyevuz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001760390616
TypeChannel
Username@sirliboyevuz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sirliboyevuz

Growth

6513 Aug 2026, 21:32 — 65 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 65 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 21:3214 Aug 2026, 23:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:1665no change
13 Aug 2026, 21:3265first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
106.2%
avg views ÷ 65 subscribers
Avg views / post
69.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20256 August 2026)
Views total69
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14284.0%
148.28%
💯105.92%
21.18%
🔥10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC69 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Siz hozir necha yoshdasiz? Ota-onangiz-chi? Yana 10-15 yildan keyin ular necha yoshda bo'lishini hech o'ylab ko'rganmisiz? O’tgan kuni shuni o'ylab, g'alati bo'lib ketdim. 15 yildan keyin ko'pchiligimizning ota-onalarimiz 70 yosh atrofida bo’ladi, balki undan ham oshadi. Shunda xayolimga bir fikr keldi: o'zimizcha niyat qilib yurgan o'sha uzoq safarlar, chet elga sayohatlar, qanaqadir qimmatbaho sovg'alar o'sha pay

6💯4👍2

7 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC262 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @botirziyatovPhoto

AI charchoq sindromi Midjourney asoschisi David Holz X'da savol yozdi: "Atrofimdagi do‘stlarim eng so‘nggi dasturlash modellaridan foydalangandan so‘ng o‘zlarini nihoyatda samarali, ammo jismoniy va ruhiy jihatdan charchagan his qilyapti. Bu menga negadir nimadir noto‘g‘ri ketayotgandek tuyuladi, lekin bu yerda katta imkoniyat borga ham o‘xshaydi. Kundalik charchoqni yengillashtirish bo‘yicha kimda amaliy maslahat

4

6 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC238 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Nega dam olishni o’zimizdan ham qizg’onamiz? Kimgadir aql o'rgatish yoki motivatsiya berish niyatim yo'q, shunchaki oxirgi paytlardagi holatim haqida yozmoqchiman. Balki oramizda yana kimdir shunday holatdadir. Bu mavzu oldingi mavzuga teskariroq. Ozgina bo'sh vaqt bo'lsa yoki shunchaki dam olmoqchi bo'lsam, darrov ichimdagi odamcha: "Vaqting ketyapti, boshqalar o'tib ketyapti, sen bekorchilik qilyapsan". Hatto d

3💯2

5 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC177 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sun'iy intellekt (AI) bizni kuchaytiryaptimi yoki susaytirib qo'yyaptimi? Oxirgi paytlari shu haqida ko'p o'ylayapman. Yangi texnologiyalar hayotimizni osonlashtirayotganidan qochib qutula olmaymiz — lift, kalkulyator, smartfon, konditsionerdan voz kechish g'irt tentaklik. Lekin chegara qayerda? O'zimdan misol: dasturlashda sun'iy intellektni (AI) faol ishlataman. Oldin soatlab yoziladigan kodlarni hozir AI yordami

👍9💯42

31 Jan 2026, 17:03 UTC291 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @SirliAI

Perfeksionizm Ko'p startuplar g'oya yomonligi uchun emas, mukammal qilaman deb vaqt o'tkazvorish oqibatida o'ladi ekan. 1. "Yana ozgina" "Dizaynini sal o'zgartiraylik", "Mana bu funksiyani ham qo'shaylik, keyin tayyor bo'ladi". Bu — sifatga intilish emas, bu — rad javobini eshitishdan qo'rqish. Kompyuter oldida kodni o'zgartirish oson, lekin mahsulotni odamlarga ko'rsatib, tanqid eshitish qiyin. 2. Bitmaydigan "Re

👍11

24 Jan 2026, 18:08 UTC292 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

"Yalqovmanda..." O'tgan kuni suhbat orasida do'stim, kulibgina: "E, ozroq yalqovmandaa" — dedi. Miyam qizib ketdi: Qanday qilib? Qanday qilib hozir, hozirgi vaziyatda o'ziga bunday "diagnoz" qo'yishi va bundan xotirjam bo'lishi mumkin? 1. Yalqovlik Agar sen "yalqovlik" qila olayotgan bo'lsang, demak, hammasi joyida. Qorning to'q, boshingda toming bor, ertaga nima yeyishing aniq. Qishning sovug'idan va issiq suvning

👍8🔥1

23 Dec 2025, 07:23 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Opportunity Cost $1200 ga yangi iPhone sotib olding. Savol: Bu telefon qanchaga tushdi? Javob: "$1200 ga". Yo'q, aslida ancha qimmatroq to'landi. Bu nima o'zi? Opportunity Cost — bu biror narsani tanlash evaziga voz kechilgan eng yaxshi ikkinchi variantning qiymati. "Har bir 'HA' degan javob, boshqa narsaga 'YO'Q' deyish." Resurslar (vaqt, pul, energiya) cheklangan. Bir vaqtning o'zida ham chapga, ham o'ngga yur

👍7

17 Dec 2025, 18:19 UTC355 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Vaqt Tahminan bir oy avval ko'rganim Vaqt (In Time) filmini ko'pchilik ko'rgan bo'lsa kerak. Bu film hozirgi zamonaviy hayotimizning aniq ko'rinishi. Film menga bitta kuchli insight berdi: Biz narsa sotib olayotganda pul to‘lamaymiz, biz hayotimizning bir qismini to‘laymiz. Oddiy matematika: Aytaylik, oyligingiz $500. Demak, ish soatingiz taxminan $3 ga to‘g‘ri keladi. Tushlikka $15 sarfladingiz — bu oddiy pul em

👍9

14 Dec 2025, 21:07 UTC534 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Z Avlod: "Mas'uliyatsiz"mi? Do'stimning videosidan so'ng, hozirgi kunda asosiy ishchi kuchiga aylanayotgan Z avlod haqida chuqurroq o'rganib chiqdim va qiziq xulosalarga keldim. Nega ular boshqacha ishlaydi? Gamifikatsiya va feedback: Yuqorida aytilganidek, bu avlod uchun "feedback" suv va havodek zarur. Ular video o'yinlar mantig'i bilan ulg'aygan: har bir harakat uchun darhol natija, ochko yoki daraja (level up)

👍11

8 Dec 2025, 23:13 UTC173 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Shunaqa ) Keng tarqalgan qarashlarga va ko'pchilik “normal” deb bilgan holatlarga 10 ta qarshi keskin fikrlar: 2) “Ko'p kitob o'qigan odam aqlli bo'ladi” — yo'q. Kitob soni aqllilik belgisi emas. O'qiganini ishlatmagan odam — yuk ko'targan eshak kabi: ustida ko'p yuk bor, lekin foydasi yo'q. 3) “Startup uchun katta g'oya kerak” — yo'q, og'riq kerak. Ko'pchillik "milliard dollar idea” izlaydi. Aslida pul bo'ladig

👍81

29 Nov 2025, 03:56 UTC192 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Yona Bergerning "Yuqumlilik" (Contagious) asarida yozilishicha mahsulot yoki kontentning ommalashishi tasodif emas, balki aniq qonuniyatlarga asoslanadi. Kitobda 6 asosiy tamoyil (STEPPS) keltirilgan: 1. Ijtimoiy valyuta — Odamlar o'zini aqlli yoki obro'li ko'rsatadigan narsalarni bo'lishishni yaxshi ko'radi. 2. Triggerlar — Atrof-muhitdagi narsalar mahsulotingizni eslatib turishi kerak (masalan, kofe va "KitKat")

👍4

16 Nov 2025, 14:34 UTC522 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Yana GPT-mi? (Jig'imga tegdi shu savol) Rosti, shu savolni eshitsam, biroz g'ashim keladi. Qachonki biror ishni osonroq, tezroq qilsang, kimdir kesatish aytadi. Bu xuddi shunday eshitilgandek bo'ladi: "Yana Google-mi ?" Nega? Bitta ma'lumot topish uchun kutubxonaga borib, soatlab kitob titkilash kerakmidi? "Yana Navigator-mi ?" Nega? Har chorrahada oynani tushirib, "aka, falon ko'cha qayerda ?" deb so'rab ketish k

👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sirliboyevuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,041,410 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sirliboyev Umurzak | 🇺🇿” (@sirliboyevuz), 65 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirliboyevuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.