Assalomu alekum👋
Bizning CYBER sportga doir o'zbekistondagi 1-o'zbekcha blogimizga xush kelibsiz👍
Biz bilan qoling va CYBER sport haqida oz bo'lsa ham tushunchaga ega bo'lasiz😉
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCokweQtRgwLPrXJD91UrJMw
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 20:45
38
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:26
38
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
232
Videos
77
Links
219
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11
37.9%
❤
8
27.6%
🔥
6
20.7%
😢
2
6.90%
👎
1
3.45%
😱
1
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 16 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Fotih Dumanning "Men - Bas qil, ey nafs" kitobini o'qishni boshladim.
Keyingi postlarda kitobdan olgan xulosalarimni bo'lishib boraman, lekin nega hozir buni yozyapman?
Hozirgi yoshlar, umuman hozirgi odamlar ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda mukkasidan ketgan va bularni o'z nafsini yenga olmaydiganlarga o'xshataman.
Nafsni yenga olmaslik bir katta dard va muammo bo'lsa, sifatsiz, vaqtni o'g'irlaydigan, bema'ni, uyatsiz, foyda…
Nvidia bosh direktori Huang Renxun kelajakda ish joylari yanada raqobatli boʻlishini va AI "xodim" sifatida murakkab vazifalarni bajarishi mumkinligini aytdi.
Huang Renxun kelajakda kod yozish kasbi yoʻq boʻlib ketishini aytib, keyingi avlodga biologiya, ta'lim, ishlab chiqarish yoki qishloq xoʻjaligini tanlashni tavsiya qiladi.
Demak dasturchilar endi kod yozmasdan AI ga buyruq berib uni bajartiradi )
@botirziyat…
#БАТАФСИЛ_ЖАВОБ
КРИПТОВАЛЮТАЛАР САВДОСИ ЖОИЗМИ?
❓CАВОЛ: Динимизда Биткоин, Ноткоин ва бошқа шу каби криптавалюталарда савдо-сотиқ қилишга муносабат қандай?
💬 ЖАВОБ: Бисмиллаҳир Роҳманир Роҳим. Биткоин, Ноткоин каби криптавалюталарни ўзаро айрибошлаш ва улар билан савдо-сотиқ қилиш шаръан жоиз эмас. Чунки ушбу криптовалюталарда шариатимиз томонидан пулга қўйилган талаблар топилмайди. Қолаверса, уларни бирор давлат…
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda klik bosish orqali xamster, notcoin’larga qiziqayotganlarga ko‘zim tushdi. Ha, Xamster gamefy bo'yicha qiziqarli va yaxshi loyiha. Lekin bu unga vaqt sarflayotganlarni oqlayman degani emas.
Kuniga soatlab tugmani bosib oyiga arzimas 60-100$ topish uchun inson qanchalik vaqt qadrini unutgan bo‘lishi kerak?
Hozir vaqt va pul barakasini yo‘qotayotgan bir zamonda turibmiz: bundan buyog‘iga faqatgin…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ra1sbuva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
67 ta odam kanalda bor ekan. Kuzatuvchilar o'zi kimlar?
O'quvchizman (kursda o'qigan)77%
Tanish bilish13%
Boshqa10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 16 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ra1sbuva named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@svidanie_uz named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RB | Ra1s buva” (@ra1sbuva), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ra1sbuva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
