Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bug M@ker Uz 👨‍💻

@BugMakerUz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002087864924
TypeChannel
Username@BugMakerUz
DescriptionIT blog of: Akmal Ahmadjonov Senior Backend Engineer
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BugMakerUz

Growth

187 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:3218no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:4118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
38
Videos
6
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1756.7%
😁723.3%
310.0%
👍310.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Dasturlash dunyosida Tamoillar, qoidalar va har xil dasturlash tillari talaygina. Sanab oxiriga yetib bolmagandek ularni farqlarini aniqlab chiqish ham alohida bir fan Lekin har biri ozini maqsadi va vazifasiga ega. Siz bularni har birini organishga vaqt sarflagandan kora, u aslida qanday muammoni qaysi yol bilan hal qilayotganini tushunsangiz istalgan muammoda istalganini ishlatib, agar siz istagan yechim uchun ker

1👍1

11 Jun 2026, 05:46 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @botirziyatov

Bir dasturchi Reddit'da yozadi: «Texnik rahbarimiz» ilgari har bir qarorning sababini doska oldida murakkab tizim dizaynini chizadigan, soatlab tushuntiradigan odam edi. Hozir esa hammasini ChatGPT'ga tashlab "tushuntirib ber" deydi. Oʻtgan hafta jiddiy xato productionʼga chiqib ketganda, uning javobi shunday boʻldi: "Lekin AI buni xavfsiz dedi ku". @botirziyatov

🔥3

15 May 2026, 04:53 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Daftar ustidan bir qancha shikoyatlarimni daftarga yozib qoydim 🫣 Hech bolmaganda bu yozuvni boshqa fontga otqazish imkoniyati bolishi kerakmidikin 😅😅 #joke @BugMakerUz

😁4

13 May 2026, 05:15 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Qilayotgan ishingizga qadr bering! Istalgan ish ayniqsa bizning ishimizda ongimiz bilan juda kop ayniqsa eng kerakli vaqtlarda kelishmovchiliklar chiqishi tabiiy! Hech qachon chet tilini yoki dasturlashni shunchaki online metroda, avtobusda yoki kuniga 1 soat vaqt ajratish bilan organib bolmaydi, bazilar bunga intizom bazilar qorquv desa men "Ongimizning qilayotgan vazifalarimiz muhimlilik darajasida qadr birinchi o

🔥2

17 Feb 2026, 05:07 UTC144 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @hisperspectivePhoto

Vayb koding dasturchilarni ishsiz qoldiradimi? 2025-yil boshida Andrey Karpaty tomonidan ommalashtirilgan vayb dasturlash bir soʻz bilan aytganda dasturchilarni ishsiz qoldiradi. Ammo, qanday dasturchilar ishsiz qoladi? Koʻrib chiqamiz. Xullas, Goldman Sachs investitsiya banki hisobotiga ko‘ra, sun’iy intellekt 300 mlnta ish o‘rniga teng vazifalarni almashtirishi mumkin. AQSh va Yevropada ishdagi vazifalarning qari

11 Feb 2026, 10:18 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Shaxsan menga bugun bir ajoyib narsa yangilik boldi, avval hech ishlatib kormagan ekanman . Javascriptga EJSON degan instrument qoshilibdi { "_id": { "$oid": "507f1f77bcf86cd799439011" }, "created": { "$date": { "$numberLong": "1739272380000" } }, // yoki ISO string "price": { "$numberDecimal": "123.45678901234567890" }, "data": { "$binary": { "base64": "SGVsbG8=", "subType": "00" } }, "regex":

2🔥2

29 Jan 2026, 08:33 UTC140 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Gapirma, na'muna bo'l Atrofda gaplar ko’p. Maslahat ko'p. Shovqin ko’p. Ushbu post ham ana shundaylaridan biri. Hamma nimadir qilishimiz kerakligini aytadi. Ammo ishini amalda ko’rsatadiganlar ko’p emas. Shuning uchun na’muna bo’lish muhim. Harakat ta’siri, quruq gapdan ko’ra kuchliroq. Faqat gapiradiganlarni emas, gapiga o'zi amal qiladigan insonlardan o'rganish samaraliroq. t.me/DrBekOlimjon

22 Jan 2026, 12:31 UTC132 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Men sen bilan qanday munosabatda ekanligimni aks ettiruvchi rasm chizib ber Shu so'rovni ChatGPT ga berib ko'rgan edim, Uning javobi 😁 #ai @BugMakerUz

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BugMakerUz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bug M@ker Uz 👨‍💻” (@BugMakerUz), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BugMakerUz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.