Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DigitalMinder

@digitalminder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

102subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001972126521
TypeChannel
Username@digitalminder
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/digitalminder

Growth

1027 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:15102no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:52102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
61
Videos
9
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

172 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2816.3%
2112.2%
🔥1911.0%
custom 5280977279038532833126.98%
💯116.40%
🎉105.81%
custom 541803459889647768295.23%
❤‍🔥95.23%
84.65%
🥰74.07%
custom 527599645270999836163.49%
custom 528294539196734647552.91%
🍓52.91%
💋52.91%
🤝52.91%
custom 521971188984343056742.33%
🏆42.33%
😘31.74%
custom 528285867228267306610.581%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalminder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 November 2025 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC440 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Rux — Go sintaksisiga yaqin yangi systems programming language So‘nggi vaqtlarda systems programming segmentida Rust, Zig va Odin’dan keyin yana bir qiziqarli loyiha paydo bo‘ldi — Rux. Til sintaksisi jihatdan Golang’ga juda yaqin, lekin architecture va low-level control tarafdan ancha “closer to metal” yondashuvni tanlaydi. Minimal syntax, explicit behavior va predictable compilation pipeline ustiga qurilgan. Oddiy

21 May 2026, 02:49 UTC436 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @jakhonrakhmonov

O'zbek dasturchilariga qiyin Ko'pchiligimiz hammaga "ho'p aka, bo'ldi aka" deb o'rganib qolganmiz. "Yo'q" deyishga qiynalamiz. Men ham shunday bo'lganman. Manager kelib "mana bu ishni qilib bera olasanmi?" desa "ha qilib beraman" deb ko'p aytar edim. "Qancha vaqt ketadi?" deb so'rasa 1 hafta deyishni o'rniga "2 kun ketadi aka" der edim. Natijada nima bo'lgan? Charchab qolganman. Hozir esa birinchi aytadigan gapim

1

5 May 2026, 04:54 UTC475 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

stresss 2

1🍓1🏆1👍1💋1🔥1🤝1

25 Apr 2026, 15:37 UTC508 views10 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlisherAhmatovichPhoto

Hech qanday izohlarsiz…

🔥41❤‍🔥1🍓1👍1💯1🤝1

25 Apr 2026, 14:47 UTC450 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Bu dofaminni hech narsa beraolmaydi 😁

3🔥3🍓1👍1🤝1

21 Apr 2026, 20:15 UTC487 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ko‘pchilik “AI dasturchilarni ishsiz qoldiradi” deb o‘ylaydi. Bu holat bir paytlar kalkulyator chiqqanda “endi buxgalterlarga ish qolmaydi” deyilgan gaplarga o‘xshaydi. Ammo amalda ko‘rib turibmiz — buxgalterlar hanuz talab yuqori bo‘lgan kasblardan biri. AI ham xuddi shunday: u dasturchini almashtirmaydi, balki uning ishini tezlashtiradigan va samaradorligini oshiradigan vosita. O‘z tajribamdan kelib chiqib aytsam

21🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digitalminder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DigitalMinder” (@digitalminder), 102 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalminder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.