Channel
@SirliAI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002826984474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SirliAI |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SirliAI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 191 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 193 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 32.7% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 24.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Claude Opus 4.8 chiqdi Anthropic bugun Opus 4.8 ni chiqardi. Narx eskisi bilan bir xil — $5 / 1M input, $25 / 1M output. Asosiy yangilik — model endi ishonchliroq. O'zi yozgan koddagi xatoliklarni o'tkazib yuborish ehtimoli 4.7 ga nisbatan 4 baravar kam. Noaniq joyni "bajardim" deb aldamaydi. Benchmarklar: SWE-Bench Pro: 64.3% → 69.2% (GPT-5.5 va Gemini 3.1 Pro dan yuqori) Tool reasoning: 54.7% → 57.9% Yangi funk…
❤1👍1👎1
Google «bizi yangi kodimizni 75%ni AI yozgan» deyapti, Anthropic «oxirgi ikkita productionga chiqargan loyihamiz sof «vibe code» qilingan» deyapti. Lekin sani mid-level developer tanishing «Ai hali kod yozolmaydi» deydi… U kishimdaqa yozolmaydimish. Baribir odamdaqa yozolmaydimish… 😄 @aimastava
👍2😁2
Docking... Interstellar kinosida bir sahna bor. Cooper o‘z kemasini asosiy kemaga ulash paytida. Kema titrab, parchalanish arafasida turibdi. Robot TARS unga: "It's not possible(Buning iloji yo'q)", deydi. Cooper esa: "No, it's necessary (Yo'q. Bu — shart)." Atrofda biror narsa boshlamoqchi bo'lgan ko'p odamlar bor. Kimdir biznes ochmoqchi, kimdir dasturlashni o'rganib, katta loyiha qurmoqchi. Va deyarli hammasi b…
👍3❤1🌚1
Yangi davr(AI) eshikni taqillatmayapti, u to’g’ridan-to’g’ri devorni buzib kiryapti. https://youtu.be/KiT0T12Yyno?si=InvW_syE8I9B4i_R
❤3🔥1
New York Times nashrida kecha bir xabar chiqdi: Bir odam 20 ming dollar pulini sarmoya qilib va o‘ndan ortiq sun’iy intellekt (AI) vositalari yordamida ikki oyda kompaniya qurgan. Ushbu kompaniyaning 2025-yildagi daromadi 401 million dollarni boʼlgan, 2026-yil uchun prognoz esa 1,8 milliard dollar. Eng qizig‘i, butun kompaniyada faqat ikki kishi full-time ishlaydi. Keyin "New York Times" bu rostanam toʼgirimi d…
❤4🔥2
🛒 ChatGPT Amazon bo'la olmadi — Instant Checkout yopilyapti OpenAI o'zining ChatGPT'ni katta do'konga aylantirish rejasidan qaytdi va to'g'ridan-to'g'ri chat ichida xarid qilish funksiyasini to'xtatdi. Hamma narsani bitta joyga tiqish har doim ham ishlamaydi — odamlar AI'dan maslahat yoki kod so'rashga o'rgangan, kiyim sotib olishga emas. Super-app qilish vasvasasi ko'p startuplarni chalg'itadi, shuning uchun faqat …
🔥3
⬛️ Google Stitch yangilandi: Landing page(sayt) yasash va sotish ancha osonlashdi Google o'zining Stitch AI generatorining yangi versiyasi chiqdi. Endi frontend noldan kod yozish o'rniga, to'liq "vibe coding" uslubiga o'tdi. Nima o'zgardi? Shunchaki qanday sayt kerakligini matn orqali tushuntirasiz yoki qog'ozdagi namuna chizmani yuklaysiz. Stitch bir necha soniyada tayyor UI dizayn va toza kodni generatsiya qilad…
👍2
Bugungi kun tahlilini yozib qo'ymoqchi edim, bundan 3 yil avvalgi yozgan xabarimni o'qib qoldim, ehhh, u paytlari Sun'iy Intellekt endigina boshlangan... Bozorda faqatgina ChatGPT va Midjourney mashxur edi. Hozir esa har kuni 100+ AI mahsulotlar chiqadi va kundan kunga tezlashib ketyapti. @sirliai
❤3👍2
💳 AI endi o'zi pul to'lay oladi — 402 xatosi tirildi Agentic Payments — bu AI agentlarining inson ishtirokisiz avtonom to'lov qilish tizimi. Hozirgi to'lov tizimlari (Stripe, Payme) insonlar uchun qilingan, endi esa kodning o'zi xizmat sotib olib, hisob-kitob qiladigan davr kelyapti. O'zbekistonda Click yoki Payme API'sini AI agentga ulab, avtomatik xarajat qiladigan botlarni ko'rishimizga oz qoldi. @sirliai
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3👍2
AI kod yozishni osonlashtirdi, lekin dasturchi bo'lish qiyinlashdi Harvard Business Review tadqiqotiga ko'ra, ishchilarning 83 foizi AI tufayli ish hajmi oshganini aytgan. Muhandislarning 62 foizi kasal holat (burnout) bilan yuzlashmoqda. Rahbariyat esa buni his qilmayapti — ular orasida atigi 38 foiz shunday deydi. Ko'pchilik dasturchilar kasbga kod yozishni yaxshi ko'rgani uchun kelgan. Endi ularga "kod yozishni …
👍3🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @SirliAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 939,430 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SirliAI” (@SirliAI), 191 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SirliAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.