Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3,650. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,019–33,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:17
29,566
-28
16 Sept 2026, 07:17
29,594
-51
14 Sept 2026, 12:58
29,645
-106
12 Sept 2026, 20:20
29,751
-154
10 Sept 2026, 18:21
29,905
-281
7 Sept 2026, 13:56
30,186
-200
4 Sept 2026, 17:58
30,386
-137
3 Sept 2026, 00:53
30,523
-66
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
30,589
-89
31 Aug 2026, 20:36
30,678
-104
30 Aug 2026, 17:43
30,782
-93
29 Aug 2026, 20:25
30,875
-77
28 Aug 2026, 20:12
30,952
-90
27 Aug 2026, 18:44
31,042
-88
26 Aug 2026, 21:34
31,130
-78
25 Aug 2026, 23:47
31,208
-84
25 Aug 2026, 00:17
31,292
-143
23 Aug 2026, 10:38
31,435
-154
21 Aug 2026, 18:59
31,589
-109
20 Aug 2026, 16:06
31,698
first reading
Engagement
891 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.13%
avg views ÷ 29,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
924
425 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
425
of 891 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 406 of 425 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
891 (7 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
392,734
Reactions total
4,440
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,480
Videos
≈200
Links
≈2,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,219 reactions across 831 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,068
49.5%
👍
2,754
33.5%
👎
353
4.29%
😁
276
3.36%
💔
210
2.56%
🤬
123
1.50%
😐
121
1.47%
🥰
92
1.12%
😱
55
0.669%
🐳
52
0.633%
👏
51
0.621%
⚡
35
0.426%
😡
29
0.353%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 834 of the 891 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 891 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 887 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arzcitysignal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 891 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 کلاهبردار جعل هویت Coinbase به ۴ تا ۱۲ سال زندان محکوم شد
‼️رونالد اسپکتور، فردی که با جعل هویت Coinbase اقدام به فیشینگ کرده بود، به ۴ تا ۱۲ سال زندان محکوم شد؛ این طرح کلاهبرداری با سرقت نزدیک به ۱۶ میلیون دلار از حدود ۱۰۰ کاربر آمریکایی همراه بوده است.
#Coinbase #Phishing #Crypto #Security
@arzcitysignal
🔹 شی جینپینگ: چین آمریکا مسئول مدیریت هوش مصنوعی هستند
🟠 رئیسجمهور چین، شی جینپینگ، گفته است که چین و ایالات متحده توانایی و مسئولیت مدیریت هوش مصنوعی را دارند.
🔹 این اظهارنظر بر نقش دو قدرت بزرگ فناوری در تعیین چارچوبها و مسئولیتهای مرتبط با توسعه و استفاده از هوش مصنوعی تأکید دارد.
@arzcitysignal
🚨 نخستین تراکنش بینبانکی با سپردههای توکنیزه انجام شد
⚡️ بانکهای بریتانیایی از جمله Lloyds، NatWest، Barclays و HSBC نخستین تراکنشهای بینبانکی جهان با استفاده از سپردههای توکنیزهشده را با موفقیت انجام دادند؛ اقدامی که میتواند گام مهمی در توسعه پرداختها و تسویهحسابهای بانکی مبتنی بر فناوری بلاکچین باشد.
#Tokenization #RWA #Blockchain #Crypto
@arzcitysignal
‼️ اگه فقط بتونی یکی از این مهارتها رو در ترید داشته باشی، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟
📊 تحلیل تکنیکال37%
💻مدیریت ریسک23%
😐 کنترل احساسات36%
🔥 صبر و منتظر موندن برای ستاپ مناسب18%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📣 مدیرعامل OKX آمریکا: سهام توکنیزهشده باید حقوق سهامداران را حفظ کند
‼️ روشان رابرت، مدیرعامل OKX آمریکا، تأکید کرده سهام توکنیزهشده باید همان حقوق سهامداران سهام سنتی را حفظ کنند؛ این اظهارات همزمان با بررسی مسیر پنجساله SEC برای معامله سهام آمریکا روی بلاکچین مطرح شده است.
#OKX #Tokenization #RWA #Crypto
@arzcitysignal
❌نهنگها ۱۱۴ هزار بیتکوین رو جارو کردند❗️
⏺نهنگها ۱۱۴ هزار بیتکوین را در سکوت بلعیدند: کیفپولهای ۱۰۰ تا ۱,۰۰۰ عددی از اواسط جولای تا الان، بیش از ۱۱۳,۹۵۰ بیتکوین را در اوج ترس بازار کفخرید کردند. موجودی این دسته به رکورد ۵.۲۴ میلیون BTC رسید؛ یعنی عملاً یکچهارم کل عرضه تاریخ بیتکوین در مشت این پول هوشمند قفل شده است.
⏺پیام بازار: تریدرهای خرد فروختند و نهنگها جارو کردند؛ عرضه در گردش بهشدت خشک شده و هر ج…
🚨 تقاضای صعودی شدید برای آپشنهای XRP
‼️ پلتفرم Coinbase Markets اعلام کرده تقاضا برای آپشنهای صعودی XRP به یکی از بالاترین سطوح سال گذشته رسیده است؛ شاخص یکهفتهای 25-Delta Call-Put Skew به ۹.۳ واحد نوسان رسیده و در صدک ۹۵ قرار دارد. این یعنی معاملهگران برای موقعیتهای صعودی XRP حاضر به پرداخت پریمیوم بالاتری هستند. XRP نیز طی هفت روز گذشته حدود ۱۸٪ رشد کرده است.
#XRP #Coinbase #Ripple #Crypto
@arzcitysignal
❌رشدهای قبلی فقط شوخی بود؛ آماده خشنترین رالی تاریخ کریپتو باشید❗️
🔴تحلیلگری با نام مستعار Ronald Carter گفت: کف بازار رسماً بسته شد دیگه منتظر قیمتهای پایینتر یا اصلاحهای عجیبوغریب نباشید. هر چی اصلاح و کفسازی لازم بود انجام شده و فروشندهها رسماً دستها رو بالا بردن.
🏎 بازی تازه داره شروع میشه: هر چقدر مارکت تا الان بالا اومده، فقط حکم روشن کردن موتور و دستگرمی داشته! چارت داره دقیقاً همون رفتار وحشی ساله…
❌آتشبس تجاری آمریکا و چین تا ۱۰ ژانویه تمدید شد❗️
🤝 تمدید آتشبس بوسان تا ۱۰ ژانویه (تنفس ۲ ماهه): ضربالاجل آتشبس تجاری قبلی آمریکا و چین (معروف به توافق بوسان) قرار بود ۱۰ نوامبر تمام شود و همه نگران بودند ترامپ با اعمال تعرفههای سنگین بالای ۱۰۰ درصد، بازارها را به خاک و خون بکشد. اما اسکات بسنت (وزیر جدید خزانهداری آمریکا) بعد از جلسه با «هه لیفنگ» (معاون نخستوزیر چین) رسماً اعلام کرد توافق تا ۱۰ ژانویه تمدی…
🔴اتریوم طلسم سپتامبر خونین رو نابود کرد❗️
⏺ثبت دومین سپتامبر رویایی تاریخ: ماهی که همیشه به ریزش و حمام خون معروف بوده، امسال برای اتریوم به یکی از درخشانترین و سبزترین ماههای کل تاریخش تبدیل شد!
⏺قدرتنمایی قبل از طوفان: وقتی چارت توی نحسترین ماه سال اینطور مقاومت میکنه و بالا میاد، یعنی نهنگها دارایی رو کفخرید کردن و اجازه ریزش ندادن. تازه داریم وارد سهماهه چهارم (Q4) میشیم؛ فصلی که رالیهای وحشی مارکت و …
❌پنهانکاری بزرگ؛ چین چقدر طلا خریده و نگفته❓
⏺بلعیدن ۱,۰۰۰ تن طلا فقط در ۸ ماه (رکورد تاریخ): چین فقط در ۸ ماه اول سال، ۱۵۸.۸ میلیارد دلار خرج خرید بیش از ۱,۰۰۰ تن طلای فیزیکی کرده است! برای اینکه ابعاد ماجرا دستتان بیاید: کل پولی که چین در تمام ۱۲ ماه سال گذشته خرج طلا کرده بود ۹۶.۵ میلیارد دلار (برای ۸۸۶ تن) بود؛ یعنی امسال ۶۵ درصد بیشتر از کل سال قبل شمش طلا وارد انبارهایش کرده است!
@arzcitysignal
👍8❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 891 posts we hold for @arzcitysignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
‼️ اگه فقط بتونی یکی از این مهارتها رو در ترید داشته باشی، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟
📊 تحلیل تکنیکال37%
💻مدیریت ریسک23%
😐 کنترل احساسات36%
🔥 صبر و منتظر موندن برای ستاپ مناسب18%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥 اگر فقط یک مهارت رو در ترید میتوانستی قوی کنی، کدوم رو انتخاب میکردی؟
💜 تحلیل تکنیکال22%
💜 مدیریت سرمایه34%
💜 روانشناسی معاملهگری15%
💜 پیدا کردن نقاط ورود44%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 891 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@arzcitysignal named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@arzcitysiignal named in 2 posts, 26 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
@azciysignal named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Michael Hashemian @Michaellhashemian · 39,271 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
ARZINEH @Arzineh_Officials · 32,543 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
بیتگلد/تحلیلگر بازارهای مالی🎖 @bitgoldkoroush · 59,633 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 September 2026
Fast Trader @fasttraderss · 150,314 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
خانه ترید | ارزدیجیتال @khanehtradee · 26,084 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
Mrdigiarz 🤑 معرفی ارزهای دیجیتال پر سود + سیگنال vip رایگان @mrdigiarz · 64,669 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
سامیار قنبری | تحلیل بازار مالی @prime_fxcoiin · 36,397 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
کورد کانفیگ @KurdConfing · 50,917 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
تحلیل بیتکوین طالس @ProfessionalBitcoinDaily · 23,672 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
TheTechسعید جولا @TheTechJoola · 23,468 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
کانال سیگنال و تحلیل ارز دیجیتال yk.crypto @YKCRYPTOchanle · 21,207 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
معین صادقیان (مِدما) @moinsl · 22,568 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
كانال رسمى ميثم ابراهيمى @meisamebrahimimusic · 23,395 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 September 2026
بورسیکس | عصر دیجیتال @boursix_digital · 28,271 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
Trade City Pro ™️ @tradecity_pro · 76,663 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Bit24 | صرافی ارز دیجیتال بیت۲۴ @bit24cash · 97,736 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیگنال ارزدیجیتال / ارزسیتی” (@arzcitysignal), 29,566 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arzcitysignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.