Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tekrargar Crypto Research

Channel

Tekrargar Crypto Research

@tekrargar_research

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,052subscribers

-408 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001717365161
TypeChannel
Username@tekrargar_research
Descriptionدر این کانال تلگرامی مطالبی که در حوزه رمزارزها٬ اقتصاد٬ تکنولوژی و سرمایه گذاری برای من جذاب هستند را به اشتراک میگذارم. این مطالب صرفا جهت آرشیو گرفتن از کارهای روزانه خودم هست و هیچگونه توصیه ای بر سرمایه گذاری نمی باشد. پشتیبانی @Tekrargarsupport
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tekrargar_research

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tekrargar_research/3620 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/850811 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC0.9859 minutes
@tekrargar_research/4145 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/1004010 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC0.98under a minute
@tekrargar_research/3613 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/84738 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC0.988 minutes
@tekrargar_research/3644 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/863417 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC0.9853 minutes
@tekrargar_research/3674 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/880426 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC0.984 minutes
@tekrargar_research/3693 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@ACADA_trade/890231 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC0.9816 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ACADA_trade17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.989 minutesthis entry (17–0)
@drshadisaffari_trader6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.993.0 hoursthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 145 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,05211,46011,2566 August 202614 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 99 days, net -408. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,991–11,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 02:0111,052-11
11 Nov 2026, 10:1411,063-6
9 Nov 2026, 15:5911,069-9
8 Nov 2026, 10:5711,078-5
7 Nov 2026, 04:5111,083-12
6 Nov 2026, 04:0511,095+3
5 Nov 2026, 03:2711,092-4
4 Nov 2026, 05:4111,096-4
3 Nov 2026, 05:3811,100-9
2 Nov 2026, 06:0111,109-9
1 Nov 2026, 07:3711,118-7
31 Oct 2026, 10:1011,125+7
30 Oct 2026, 08:3611,118-7
29 Oct 2026, 10:0511,125-2
28 Oct 2026, 06:5111,127+8
27 Oct 2026, 06:4611,119-14
26 Oct 2026, 05:2911,133-4
25 Oct 2026, 02:2111,137+1
24 Oct 2026, 01:1011,136+2
22 Oct 2026, 22:0911,134first reading

Engagement

215 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 11,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
103 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 215 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held215 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total118,391
Reactions total1,675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈783
Videos
≈98
Links
≈2,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
1m 24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,578 reactions across 211 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,73048.4%
👍1,37838.5%
💔1143.19%
😁691.93%
🔥601.68%
🤔521.45%
🐳391.09%
🙏391.09%
😍240.671%
👌190.531%
🤪190.531%
😐110.307%
🏆90.252%
🕊50.14%
💯30.084%
🦄30.084%
❤‍🔥20.056%
🫡20.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 212 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 212 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tekrargar_research. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 215 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 106 posts held from the last 30 days (0.943%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC463 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🔔 ویدیوی جدید کانال یوتیوب تکرارگر: 🎥 بیت کوین زیر ۷۰ هزار دلار سقوط کرد: الان وقت خرید است؟ 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4En-HhMOKiU ⏰ بروزرسانی: 21:00 🆔 @Tekrargar_research

🔥8😐2

14 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,200 views42 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

بیت کوین و میانگین متحرک ۴ ساله @Tekrargar_research

👍33🐳6❤3

14 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,220 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🌱صبح همگی بخیر ☀️ 🔴امروز شنبه 🔴23 آبان 1405 🔴 14 نوامبر 2026 📊وضعیت بازار رمزارزها: Market Cap: $2.288T 24h Vol: $86.818B Dominance: BTC 58.7%, ETH 10.11% Fear & Greed: 13 (Extreme Fear) BTC 67,130 -1.45% ETH 1,903 -0.48% 📈📈 سه رمز ارز با بیشترین افزایش PEARL 18% INJ 13% NIGHT 8% 📉📉 سه رمز ارز با بیشترین کاهش ETHFI -7% PEPE -6% GRAM -6%

👍10❤1

13 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,310 views17 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026

🔔 ویدیوی جدید کانال یوتیوب تکرارگر: 🎥 سقوط بیت کوین به ۶۷ هزار دلار؛ ریزش ادامه دارد یا وقت خرید است؟ 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRcx3VAoha8 ⏰ بروزرسانی: 21:00 🆔 @Tekrargar_research

❤13👍4

13 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,320 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/HaXN7OcIVcM?si=E8wrnAhcGyPX4ve5 🆔 @Tekrargar_research

👍20❤1🔥1

13 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,220 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

⚡ چند دقیقه تأخیر، گاهی یعنی از دست دادن بهترین نقطه ورود. اگر قرار است تصمیم معاملاتی بگیری، چرا باید زمانی سیگنال را ببینی که بخش مهمی از حرکت بازار انجام شده؟ در Trade Hub تکرارگر، شما به دیتای لایو و سیگنال‌های معاملاتی در لحظه دسترسی دارید؛ همان جایی که تریدرهای حرفه‌ای در حال رصد بازار و تصمیم‌گیری هستند. 🎯 می‌خواهی وارد Trade Hub شوی؟ فقط این ۳ مرحله را انجام بده: 1️⃣ ثبت‌نام از طریق لینک ریفرال رسمی ما د…

❤8👍2

13 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,090 views5 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

🚀 کمپین ویژه صرافی WEEX فرصت دریافت تا ۱,۰۰۰ تتر بونوس معاملاتی (Trial Fund) به همراه ۱۰٪ کش‌بک و سطح VIP 5! 📅 مهلت شرکت: ۲۷ اکتبر تا ۲۶ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ 🎁 جوایز بر اساس واریز و حجم معاملات فیوچرز: واریز ۵۰۰ تتر | حجم ۵۰۰ هزار تتر ⬅️ ۵۰ تتر بونوس واریز ۱,۰۰۰ تتر | حجم ۱ میلیون تتر ⬅️ ۱۰۰ تتر بونوس واریز ۲,۰۰۰ تتر | حجم ۲ میلیون تتر ⬅️ ۲۰۰ تتر بونوس واریز ۵,۰۰۰ تتر | حجم ۵ میلیون تتر ⬅️ ۵۰۰ تتر بونوس واریز ۱۰,۰۰۰ تت…

👍5

13 Nov 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🏛 پاترون تکرارگر | دسترسی به لایه اول تصمیم‌گیری و ابزارها اگر می‌خواهید فراتر از محتوای عمومی، به داده‌های بدون فیلتر و میز کار تحلیلی ما متصل شوید، این امکانات در پاترون در دسترس شماست: 🎯 پوزیشن‌ها و نقاط ورود/خروج: * اطلاع لحظه‌ای از نقاط خرید و فروش من * دسترسی اختصاصی به معاملات و ستاپ‌های برترین تریدرهای برتر بازار 🎙 ارتباط زنده و محتوای تحلیلی: * لایوهای هفتگی اختصاصی: بررسی زنده بازار در فضایی آرام، محدو…

👍4

13 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,020 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🌱صبح همگی بخیر ☀️ 🔴امروز جمعه 🔴22 آبان 1405 🔴 13 نوامبر 2026 📊وضعیت بازار رمزارزها: Market Cap: $2.312T 24h Vol: $87.773B Dominance: BTC 59.0%, ETH 10.05% Fear & Greed: 20 (Extreme Fear) BTC 68,132 -7.31% ETH 1,911 -6.54% 📈📈 سه رمز ارز با بیشترین افزایش BDX 3% PYTH 2% JST 1% 📉📉 سه رمز ارز با بیشترین کاهش BTW -29% GT -12% VVV -9%

❤5👍1

12 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,130 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🔔 ویدیوی جدید کانال یوتیوب تکرارگر: 🎥 بازار در کنترل خرس ها | تحلیل امروز بیت کوین 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSLr9FP3Aac ⏰ بروزرسانی: 21:00 🆔 @Tekrargar_research

❤9👍7🔥2

12 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,130 views42 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

افشین کجایی دقیقا کجایی؟؟😂😂

😁25❤10🤪7

12 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ریزش ها و رشدهای بازار را قشنگ میشه داخلش دید

👍12🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @tekrargar_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTCAnonymous Poll157 voters

تا نیم ساعت دیگه لایو بشیم توی یوتیوب؟

  1. اره خیلی لازم هست59%
  2. نه نیازی نیست22%
  3. دیدن نتیجه20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Michael Hashemian
@Michaellhashemian · 39,580
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
تحلیل بیت‌کوین طالس
@ProfessionalBitcoinDaily · 22,861
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
ARZINEH
@Arzineh_Officials · 32,424
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
Trade City Pro ™️
@tradecity_pro · 79,563
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
سیگنال ارزدیجیتال / ارزسیتی
@arzcitysignal · 26,404
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 September 2026
Gems Official Announcements
@GemsVIPOfficial · 20,792
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
TOBTC 👉Technical Analysis
@TOBTC · 42,641
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
معین صادقیان (مِدما)
@moinsl · 22,524
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
behroozahmadieco
@behroozahmadieco · 50,455
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
کانال سیگنال و تحلیل ارز دیجیتال yk.crypto
@YKCRYPTOchanle · 20,197
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
معامله گر٣بعدي
@trader_3D · 22,192
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
با من باشین تا گم نشین
@moji_anti_left · 43,071
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tekrargar Crypto Research” (@tekrargar_research), 11,052 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tekrargar_research.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.