Channel
@ditishetnieuws
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,240subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001179279064 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ditishetnieuws |
| Created | 10 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ditishetnieuws |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 12,240 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 12,242 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 12,245 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12,252 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 12,258 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 12,259 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 12,261 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 12,269 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 12,271 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 12,271 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (28 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120,680 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Premier Jette n.a.v het boerenprotest op de snelweg: "....dat het onacceptabel en onbegrijpelijk is dat je op de snelweg demonstreert...mijn boodschap: demonstreer niet op de snelweg" ...behalve dan als je vóór het duistere agende 2030-narratief van de overheid bent: Teletekst 14 september 2023: In Den Haag hebben klimaatactivisten van Extinction Rebellion een paar uur de A12 geblokkeerd, zonder dat de politie in…
Je kunt mensen alles wijs maken... "Het grootste verdriet van B&B vol liefde-Iris", kopt Weekend én.. “Een halfjaar na zijn geboorte kreeg Luke de DKTP-vaccinatie. Iris vond hem de volgende dag in zijn bedje.” “Uit de autopsie bleek dat er geen verband met het vaccin was. Het was wiegedood.” Bronnen: Privé, 29 juli 2026. Telegraaf https://t.me/ditishetnieuws
Bericht van de vicepresident van de Verenigde Staten, JD Vance: "Al jarenlang onderwerpen sommige ziekenhuizen en zorgverleners kinderen aan gruwelijke, experimentele behandelingen in het kader van radicale genderideologieën. Vandaag weten we dankzij het rapport *Wolves in White Coats*, gepubliceerd door @ HHSGov, waarom: winst. Het blijkt dat het overtuigen van kwetsbare kinderen om hun geslacht te verwerpen, pat…
De corrupte marionettenmedia, waaronder de Telegraaf, vechten terug en gooien alles in de strijd. Natuurlijk worden loze woorden uit de kast gehaald als "wetenschappers" en "gezondheidsexperts". Bericht zojuist van de Telegraaf: "Donald Trump heeft een decreet getekend om minder vaccinaties te geven aan kinderen. Volgens Trump behouden kinderen daarmee bescherming van een ‘gouden standaard’ en komen de VS met dit p…
Bericht van Eric Daugherty: "🚨 BREAKING: DR. FAUCI SCHULDIGVERKLAARD AAN MINACHTING VAN HET CONGRES door de commissie van Rand Paul, met 8 tegen 5 stemmen GEVANGENIS! Senator Rand Paul heeft zojuist de DEFINITIEVE stemming in de commissie gehouden en de zaak wordt nu DOORGESTUURD NAAR HET MINISTERIE VAN JUSTITIE 🔥 Het is tijd dat Fauci verantwoording aflegt. De Democraten hebben tijdens deze commissievergadering…
Zouden ze dit fragment ook bij 'NOS sport' of 'Vandaag Inside' gaan uitzenden? Ook zo benieuwd naar de meningen hierover van de Covid WEF-charlatans Wilfred Genee, Johan Derksen en René van der Gijp? Bericht van Clandestine: "Dit is groot nieuws. Hoewel de hoorzitting met Fauci niet veel aandacht kreeg van de linkse mainstreammedia, is het toch via sociale media onder het grote publiek verspreid en heeft het nu o…
Spreuken 4:7 "De beginsel der wijsheid is: verkrijg wijsheid; en boven al wat je verkrijgt, verkrijg verstand." https://t.me/ditishetnieuws
"The fight against the machine" Een simpele vertaalopdracht van een bericht uit Amerika, zie https://t.me/ditishetnieuws/19781, wordt door AI afgewezen. Het gevecht is al begonnen... https://t.me/ditishetnieuws
Bericht van And We Know: "🚨 TOPADVISEUR VAN FAUCI AANGEKLAAGD VOOR HET VERDOEZELEN VAN COVID🚨 David Morens, een voormalige topadviseur van Fauci, is zojuist aangeklaagd omdat hij heeft meegewerkt aan het organiseren van een van de grootste COVID-doofpotaffaires in de geschiedenis. • Vervalste documenten • Verwijderd bewijsmateriaal • Communicatie via geheime Gmail-accounts Ze hielden de waarheid verborgen voor he…
De omgedraaide wereld. Agenda 2030 van de VN/WEF/Club van Rome, Bilderberg in uitvoering... https://t.me/ditishetnieuws
Hoeveel journalisten, zoals Dana Bash (CNN), zijn in de wereld opgeleid door geheime diensten als de CIA en AIVD om mensen te misleiden? Luister naar haar geprogrammeerde teksten en de Amerikaanse minister van Volksgezondheid Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK jr.) die haar van repliek dient RFK jr: "Ik ga dit niet met je debatteren. Natuurlijk doe je dat niet. Het enige wat je weet te doen is dingen herhalen die mensen je …
Je ogen de kost geven... https://t.me/ditishetnieuws
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ditishetnieuws. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 248,751 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gerard Le Noble” (@ditishetnieuws), 12,240 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ditishetnieuws.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.