En

Channel
De Nieuwshoorn
@Nieuwshoorn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,784subscribers
-187 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001244449319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nieuwshoorn |
| Created | 31 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nieuwshoorn |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 3,784 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 3,788 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 3,816 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 3,833 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 3,844 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 3,850 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 3,851 | -53 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 3,904 | -45 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 3,949 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 3,961 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 3,966 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 3,969 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 3,971 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 3,971 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 29s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 10 | 27.8% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 27.8% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 19.4% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Zie
Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi speaks about Spain: "I have news for all those antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very, very soon the Arabs will unalive all of you. Not a single Spaniard will remain capable of continuing to live in Spain."
🤬1
Tijd om een Cyber-Nazi te worden, laat je lichaam achter jongens en meisjes.
⚡2
JUST IN - For the first time, AI has designed complete viral genomes, producing 16 functional viruses that infect bacteria and "pose no threat to people." The team reportedly excluded viruses capable of infecting complex organisms from its training data and worked in a "secure laboratory." Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/jiweyr71fi/ @disclosetv
Dagelijkse herinnering
Video, posted without a caption
🤬1
Onlangs zag ik hem op Caleb Hammer waar ie geen zak verstand van z’n eigen financiën had terwijl hij rolt in miljoenen dollars. Het jammere is dus dat ie spreekt over hoe slecht het allemaal is, maar eigenlijk moet beginnen met flappen tappen om er wat aan te doen.
⚡4💯1
De ongewassen jonge god Ass-man-gold mag niet de waarheid spreken.
⚡3
🇺🇸🇪🇸🇲🇦⚡- Twitch commentator Asmongold was banned on Twitch while reacting to the migrant invasion of Ceuta, Spain. He claimed that migrants use children as emotional blackmail to avoid being turned away or harmed. He later said that migrants, or invaders, should be shot regardless of the situation, as it will discourage migration overall and prevent women and children from being collateral damage.
😱4⚡1
Denk toch aan de globale meerderheid en hun recht tot blanke landen! https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/ceuta-vraagt-spanje-hulp-voor-opvang-minderjarige-migranten-achterblijvers-opgejaagd-door-burgerpatrouilles~b1237f9f/
🤬3
New comic 📸 https://stonetoss.com/comic/birds-of-a-feather-flock-together/
💯1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Nieuwshoorn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,8262 postsDoomPosting
@doomposting · 7,9012 postsRerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 170,7962 postsAzazel News
@AzazelNews · 26,3291 postDisclose.tv
@disclosetv · 322,8721 postInternational Blackshirts
@internationalblackshirts2 · 3,0971 postStonetoss
@stone_toss · 21,0351 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@klokkenluiders · 39,396
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“De Nieuwshoorn” (@Nieuwshoorn), 3,784 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nieuwshoorn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.