Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for politiegeweld en Intimidatie

Channel

politiegeweld en Intimidatie

@politiegeweldenintimidatie

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

935subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583446484
TypeChannel
Username@politiegeweldenintimidatie
Created23 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/politiegeweldenintimidatie

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9359619487 August 2026 — 961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 961 subscribers16 August 2026 — 953 subscribers23 August 2026 — 945 subscribers31 August 2026 — 940 subscribers19 September 2026 — 935 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 931–965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:20935-5
31 Aug 2026, 14:08940-5
23 Aug 2026, 13:37945-8
16 Aug 2026, 21:42953-8
8 Aug 2026, 00:48961no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:57961first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
5m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

370 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬11130.0%
😁4311.6%
👍4211.4%
😢256.76%
👏236.22%
🤡205.41%
❤164.32%
🔥164.32%
💯154.05%
🤮133.51%
🙈123.24%
🖕102.70%
😱102.70%
😡51.35%
🥱30.811%
🍾10.27%
👎10.27%
💩10.27%
🕊10.27%
🤔10.27%
1 further kind10.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 370 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 9 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2025, 19:20 UTC≈5,280 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐖𝐚𝐚𝐤𝐳𝐚𝐚𝐦 𝐞𝐧 𝐃𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐚𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐚𝐫 𝐯𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐞? “𝐖𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐠, 𝐰𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐚𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐧 𝐕𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐧 𝐕𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫, 𝐮𝐢𝐭 𝐯𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐯𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐮𝐮𝐬 𝐯𝐚𝐧 “𝐧𝐨𝐠 𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐞 𝐯𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧”, 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐤𝐭 𝐚𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐞 𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐯𝐨𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐧, 𝐰𝐚𝐚𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐣 𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐣 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧, 𝐝𝐚𝐭 𝐳𝐢𝐣 𝐝𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐣𝐝 𝐳𝐢𝐣𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐧 𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐤.” “𝐈𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟔𝟖 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞…

🔥12👍7❤6😡5

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

8 Feb 2025, 13:50 UTC≈3,920 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

42 invalidenparkeerplaatsen in een straat: ‘Dit is niet normaal’ 📌 https://www.bd.nl/binnenland/42-invalidenparkeerplaatsen-in-een-straat-dit-is-niet-normaal~aaa97b12/ t.me/hetkantelpunt

😁20😱5❤4🔥4

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

7 Feb 2025, 06:01 UTC≈3,910 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Efteling introduceert nieuwe parkregels met demonstratieverbod Het sprookjesachtige attractiepark Efteling heeft recentelijk nieuwe regels aan het parkreglement toegevoegd, die een verbod op demonstraties vastleggen. https://newsfacts.info/v/67a0c2e569d1b9b91697ad34/efteling_introduceert_nieuwe_parkregels_met_demonstratieverbod

🤮13😱5❤3👍3

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

7 Feb 2025, 06:01 UTC≈3,270 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Politie gooit Nederlanders uit huis, asielzoekers krijgen gratis luxe bungalows: ‘Ik heb dit met buikpijn gekeken’

🤬36

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

6 Feb 2025, 15:43 UTC≈2,400 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Terwijl de gemeente Eemnes luxe bungalows beschikbaar stelt voor asielzoekers, worden hardwerkende Nederlanders uit hun appartement gezet door dezelfde gemeente. ON!-Verslaggever Jonathan Krispijn is erbij als ze worden afgevoerd door de politie.

🤬25😁2❤1👍1🫡1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

6 Feb 2025, 07:55 UTC≈1,880 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Beste leden na diversen waarschuwingen omtrent of topic berichten.zijn er aantal die gewoon doorgaan en denken dat dit een rodelpraat kanaal is dit is een protest kanaal tegen politie is daarvoor gaat er als dit doorgaan geblokt worden De eigenaar

👏22🤡2💩1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

6 Feb 2025, 07:43 UTC≈1,700 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

17706644.eecc1bff

👍6🤔1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

6 Feb 2025, 07:42 UTC≈1,580 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Werkende Nederlanders Uit Huis Gezet, Maar Wel Ruimte voor Asielzoekers ... https://youtube.com/watch?v=tS3delmtVPI&si=RxUZMLeZetZGvtl3

🤬19

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

5 Feb 2025, 13:33 UTC≈2,130 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Meer regels en beperkingen zullen niet leiden tot minder of beter beheersbare demonstraties, maar juist tot de noodzaak tot meer handhaving en meer inzet van politie,’ waarschuwt Halsema richting de Tweede Kamer, waar wordt overwogen het demonstratierecht in te perken. https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/burgemeester-femke-halsema-politie-amsterdam-overbelast-veiligheid-op-straat-in-gevaar~b3425165/

🤡18🤬4😁4👍3❤1🍾1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

4 Feb 2025, 10:29 UTC≈1,630 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

11-Jarig Meisje in Nieuwegein Doodgestoken: Politie Negeerde Waarschuwingen Over Syrische Verdachte https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/terrorisme/11-jarig-meisje-in-nieuwegein-doodgestoken-politie-negeerde-waarschuwingen-over-syrische-verdachte

😢16🤬7👍1🕊1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

3 Feb 2025, 07:54 UTC≈1,480 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Dit is een terreurdaad. Klimaat activisten zijn terroristen. Deze groepen moeten opgedoekt worden en de leden opgepakt en vervolgd worden. Zet daar een arrestatieteam en recherche op en pak het keihard aan. Zero tolerance voor terroristen.

💯15👍5❤1

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

3 Feb 2025, 07:54 UTC≈1,500 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

XR Verspreidt Boterzuur in H&M: Terroristische Aanslag of 'Ludieke Actie'? https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/politiek/xr-verspreidt-boterzuur-in-hm-terroristische-aanslag-of-ludieke-actie

🤬12

Signed politiegeweld en intimidatie

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @politiegeweldenintimidatie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klokkenluiders 🕊🕊 voor vrijheid 🤜🤛 Nieuws
@klokkenluiders · 39,237
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“politiegeweld en Intimidatie” (@politiegeweldenintimidatie), 935 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politiegeweldenintimidatie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.