Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام

Channel

آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام

@drjavaherkalam

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,328subscribers

+367 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474220394
TypeChannel
Username@drjavaherkalam
Descriptionطرح مباحث حقوق مدنی با تاکید بر رویه قضایی آثار، افکار و اندیشه‌های تازه حقوقی آرای نو و بدیع قضایی مباحث روز نظام حقوقی مروری بر پژوهش‌ها، تالیف‌ها و تصنیف‌های دکتر محمدهادی جواهرکلام https://t.me/drjavaherkalam
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/drjavaherkalam

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9618,3288,144.56 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,967 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,982 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,002 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,033 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,041 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,056 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,065 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,073 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,075 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,094 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,099 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,110 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,146 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,162 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,182 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,198 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,218 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,219 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,236 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,248 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,253 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,262 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,272 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,281 subscribers14 November 2026 — 8,328 subscribers6 August 202614 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 100 days, net +367. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,906–8,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 09:478,328+47
9 Nov 2026, 14:158,281+9
6 Nov 2026, 07:498,272+10
3 Nov 2026, 01:108,262+9
30 Oct 2026, 15:598,253+5
28 Oct 2026, 00:088,248+12
24 Oct 2026, 16:568,236+17
21 Oct 2026, 20:198,219+1
18 Oct 2026, 17:468,218+20
15 Oct 2026, 07:488,198+16
12 Oct 2026, 05:388,182+20
5 Oct 2026, 09:158,162+16
26 Sept 2026, 23:578,146+36
17 Sept 2026, 15:178,110+11
13 Sept 2026, 22:588,099+5
10 Sept 2026, 04:008,094+19
5 Sept 2026, 05:398,075+2
1 Sept 2026, 11:048,073+8
29 Aug 2026, 04:128,065+9
26 Aug 2026, 01:048,056first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 8,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.885%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held47 (31 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total27,037
Reactions total210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,270
Videos
≈6
Links
≈34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

718 reactions across 42 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38353.3%
👍19427.0%
👌476.55%
👎456.27%
👏375.15%
🙏121.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,280 views16 reactionsread 15 November 2026

تأثیر تصرفات طولانی‌مدت و آبادانی اراضی بر استحقاق دریافت حق زارعانه در پرونده حاضر، اختلاف ناظر بر استحقاق زارعان به دریافت حق زارعانه و حق ریشه بابت آبادانی، کشت و زرع و غرس اشجار در اراضی موروثی بود. به این شرح که خواهان‌ها مدعی بودند از زمان فوت مورث خود در سال ۱۳۵۶، حدود ۵۰ سال در اراضی کشاورزی اقدام به زراعت و آبادانی نموده و متحمل هزینه و زحمات متعدد شده‌اند؛ اما پس از طرح دعوای تقسیم ترکه از سوی خواندگان و ت…

🙏10❤6

12 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC≈1,470 views29 reactionsread 15 November 2026

چنانکه پیش‌تر عرض کردم، ضرورت دارد در نگارش متن نهایی رای وحدت رویه، موارد مشمول تلف حکمی (از جمله نص ماده ۱۰ قانون الزام در فرضی که شخص ثالثی با جعل سند یا کلاهبرداری برای ملک فاقد سند رسمی، سند حدنگار تک برگ سبزرنگ بگیرد و به سخص ثالث با حسن‌نیت منتقل کند که قانون معامله دوم را معتبر می‌داند و ابطال سند دارنده با حسن نیت را اجازه نمی‌دهد) از شمول رای خارج گردد. نباید فراموش کرد که هیات همومی دیوان عالی کشور اجازه ق…

❤15👌11👎3

12 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC972 viewsread 13 November 2026
File

پیش‌نشست رای وحدت رویه درباره لزوم یا عدم لزوم تقدیم دادخواست در مورد رد مال غیرمنقول انتقال‌یافته به اشخاص ثالث به‌موجب سند رسمی و پاسخ اینجانب به استعلام هیات عمومی دیوان عالی کشور پیرامون آن

12 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,000 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026

درخصوص لزوم تقدیم دادخواست در‌مورد رد مال غیرمنقول که با سند رسمی به اشخاص ثالث انتقال یافته است، با استنباط متفاوت از ماده یک قانون تشدید مجازات مرتکبین ارتشاء و اختلاس و کلاهبرداری، آرای مختلفی از‌سوی شعب بدوی و تجدیدنظر استان‌ها صادر شده است. ۱- آراء متهافت به استحضار می‌رساند درخصوص لزوم تقدیم دادخواست در‌مورد رد مال غیرمنقول که با سند رسمی به اشخاص ثالث انتقال یافته است، با استنباط متفاوت از ماده یک قانون تشدید…

❤6👎2

10 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,920 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026

صدور رای وحدت جدید هیات عمومی دیوان عالی کشور در خصوص ردّ مال حاصل از جرم کلاهبرداری که به شخص ثالث انتقال یافته و ابطال سند رسمی انتقال در جلسه امروز (سه‌شنبه) هیات عمومی دیوان عالی کشور، اختلاف استنباط بین شعب سوم دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان چهارمحال و بختیاری و دهم دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان سمنان و پنجاه و هفتم دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران در خصوص ردّ مال در جرائم کلاهبرداری، بررسی شد. پس از بحث و تبادل نظر پیرامون موضوع م…

👍28❤5👎1

9 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,550 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026

نقش صوری بودن معامله و تأثیر آن بر پذیرش دعوای اعتراض ثالث اجرایی در پرونده حاضر، اختلاف ناظر بر اعتبار معامله انجام‌شده نسبت به یک دستگاه خودروی پژو پارس و ادعای مالکیت خریدار پس از توقیف خودرو بابت مطالبه مهریه بود. به این شرح که خواهان مدعی شده بود خودرو را از خوانده ردیف اول خریداری کرده و ثمن معامله را معادل ۳۹/۵ گرم طلا پرداخت نموده و پیش از توقیف خودرو نیز وکالت‌نامه‌ای جهت تعویض پلاک دریافت کرده است؛ اما متع…

👍14❤6

9 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,460 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤4

31 Oct 2026, 16:28 UTC≈2,950 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

رای اصراری هیات عمومی شعب حقوقی دیوان عالی کشور مبنی بر تکلیف شهرداری به پرداخت اجرت‌المثل ملک واقع در طرح از زمان تصرف تا روز پرداخت بهای ملک در صورت عدم رعایت تشریفات قانونی برای تملک ملک

❤15👍13👌1

28 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC≈3,220 views23 reactionsread 13 November 2026

قلمرو اسقاط خیار غبن؛ نقد و بررسی دادنامه شماره ۹۴۰۹۹۷۰۹۰۶۹۰۰۵۸۷ مورخ ۱۰/۱۲/۱۳۹۴ از شعبه سوم دیوان عالی کشور  نویسنده: دکتر محمدهادی جواهرکلام استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران مجله: آیین دادرسی مدنی تطبیقی، دوره ۲، ویژه نامه نکوداشت قاضی حسن غفارپور، رئیس شعبه سوم دیوان عالی کشور، ۱۴۰۵، ص۱۰۵-۱۱۶. نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی چکیده ارزیابی قلمرو شرط «اسقاط خیار غ…

❤18👍2👏2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @drjavaherkalam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@drjavaherkalam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 November 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اطلاعات حقوقى و قضايى
@hoghooghivaghazaie · 49,278
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
بانک آرای قضایی
@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi · 21,660
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
شهرداد
@dadshahr96 · 19,805
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 22,646
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,722
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 132
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,188
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 22,156
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,922
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
آرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,990
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,490
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 29,176
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,655
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 46,297
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 74,467
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 109,014
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,739
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 41,977
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری
@drseyedjafari · 58,401
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
سیویلیکا، مرجع مقالات علمی
@civilicacom · 67,881
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام” (@drjavaherkalam), 8,328 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drjavaherkalam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.